Today's opinions
• The Supreme Court allowed President Donald Trump to end temporary deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals from Haiti and Syria that have endured war and natural disasters.
• The court also cleared the way for the Trump administration to revive a controversial policy that aims to curb the number of migrants that officials at the southern border must process to determine whether they have a right to seek safe haven in the US.
• The justices struck down a Hawaii law that banned guns on private property open to the public where the owner hadn’t explicitly condoned the carrying of firearms.
Our live coverage has ended
Takeaways from the big immigration decisions

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority delivered President Donald Trump a pair of significant affirmations of his immigration policy Thursday, paving the way for the administration to effectively remove more than 1 million people from the US and keep many others from entering in the first place.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote both decisions over scathing dissents from the court’s three liberals.
There was also tension in the courtroom between the justices, as liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor took the symbolic step of reading her dissent from the bench. Alito then retorted publicly, stunning court observers accustomed to decorum from the justices.
Here’s what to know:
- Conservatives remove court from reviewing TPS
- Kagan slams majority for downplaying Trump’s words
- Trump administration has a decision to make on asylum
- TPS ruling may bring serious economic consequences
- Sotomayor’s biting dissent and Alito’s stunning response
- The 6-3 rulings pile up
Joy of Haiti’s World Cup run ends just before Supreme Court's decision

Haitian fans emerged in force in downtown Atlanta on Wednesday, donned in red and blue jerseys to watch the Caribbean nation’s last match of this year’s World Cup.
While Haiti didn’t win its match against Morocco, fans were jubilant about being able to cheer on their team, which defied the odds to play in its first World Cup since the 1970s.
But the pending TPS decision weighed heavily on people’s minds, especially given that rights groups and experts have warned that Haiti –– a country where more than 2,300 people have been killed by gang attacks this year and 1.5 million more have been displaced –– is not safe for nationals to go back.
Haitian citizen Jude Exama held a sign outside Atlanta Stadium on Wednesday drawing attention to what’s happening in his home country. Thursday, the former medical student told CNN he doesn’t intend to return.
“I myself have no choice but to stay in the country,” Exama said. “How do you think I can go and live in a country like that… I would rather starve to death hiding from immigration than live in open hell in Haiti.”
GOP Ohio governor calls TPS ruling "a mistake"
Republican Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio, who has strongly supported Haitian Temporary Protected Status holders, called Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling “a mistake” that will hurt the state and its economy.
“As a result of today’s ruling, the over 10,000 Haitians who have been living in Ohio (mostly in the Springfield area) legally through TPS will now be here illegally and will be subject to immediate deportation,” DeWine said in a statement. “This also means that while these Haitians were working and contributing to our community and economy yesterday, today it is now illegal to employ them.”
Haitian TPS holders in Springfield, Ohio, became the subject of attacks by President Donald Trump, who accused them in a 2024 presidential debate of eating dogs and cats.
Springfield is “coming back” economically partly because of its Haitian immigrant residents who are working and spending money in the community, DeWine told CNN’s Dana Bash on Inside Politics in February.
On Thursday, DeWine noted that that the federal government advises against traveling to Haiti.
“The situation in Haiti could hardly be much worse. The violent gangs run most of the country. The government barely functions. And, the economy is in shambles,” he said. “But, more importantly, changing the immigration status of these individuals is not in the best interest of the United States nor Ohio.”
As a senator, DeWine voted in 2006 to confirm Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote the majority opinion in the case.
Hospitality company expects to lose several hundred workers in Florida
Jan Gautam, CEO of IHRMC Hotels & Resorts, will likely have to lay off roughly 20% of his staff at dozens of hotels in Florida in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling allowing the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitians.
“We respect the judicial system,” he told CNN. “We’ll let everyone go, and we’ll suffer and they’ll suffer.”
The Haitian TPS holders work as housekeepers, landscapers, supervisors and in other positions at the hotels. Without them, he would have to keep some rooms closed at times because the hotels wouldn’t be able to prepare them promptly for the next guests. Plus, he’ll have to spend time finding new employees —already a challenging task — and shell out thousands of dollars in training for each of them.
Already, several of his workers who are Haitian TPS holders have quit in recent months because of the uncertainty surrounding their status, he said.
Florida has the largest share by far, but tens of thousands also reside in New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Ohio and other states.
Attorneys urge Haitians to pursue other legal immigration pathways quickly

Haitians who are losing deportation protections as a result of the Supreme Court decision on Temporary Protected Status should seek any other legal immigration pathways as soon as possible, attorneys said Thursday.
“Do not wait until you are being arrested by (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) to think about this,” said Katie Kersh, managing attorney at Advocates for Basic Legal Equality in Dayton, Ohio. “The immigration system moves very slowly. It’s very difficult to get something done as an emergency at the last minute.”
Permits that had allowed many Haitians to work legally will now end, Kersh told reporters. And in Ohio, she said, driver’s licenses for those who don’t have legal work permits will expire early next month.
Some may have options to remain legally in the country, said Geoffrey Pipoly, one of the attorneys who represented Haitian TPS holders in the case.
“It’s not an all or nothing thing. It’s going to depend on individual facts and circumstances whether they have a right to remain. It’s not a question I can answer in general, it’s going to be case by case,” he said.
But many who’ve been on TPS may not have another pathway.
“I do think the majority of these folks are going to be left with very few, if any, options,” he said.
And the consequences, he said, could be dire for those who are deported.
Advocates say they’re pushing Congress to pass legislation to that would extend TPS for Haitians until the end of the Trump administration.
What’s next for people in the US who have Temporary Protected Status?
More than a million people may soon be eligible for deportation in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision on a form of humanitarian relief that’s been extended to certain nationalities and allowed them to live and work in the United States.
The Trump administration had attempted to end the relief known as Temporary Protected Status for 13 out of 17 countries that had been designated under the Biden administration. Multiple federal courts blocked the administration from moving forward with those terminations following lawsuits from immigrant advocates.
The Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration on TPS by essentially ruling that courts have no business deciding the issue in the first place.
Legal challenges against the administration over revoking TPS for multiple countries will likely be dismissed because of the court’s decision, so the administration will be able to proceed with its plans. People who are protected from deportation under designations that the administration has moved to revoke would have those protections stripped, including their work permits.
“It’s certainly very possible now that the Supreme Court has cleared the path for the administration to undertake the mass deportation of this more than 1 million people from these countries,” said Ahilan Arulanantham, who argued the Syrian TPS case before the Supreme Court and is a law professor at UCLA School of Law. “It would be the largest dedocumentization event of people in US history.”
Countries for which the administration has tried to terminate TPS:
- Haiti
- Syria
- Venezuela
- Honduras
- Afghanistan
- Nepal
- Cameroon
- Myanmar (Burma)
- Ethiopia
- Somalia
- South Sudan
- Yemen
- Nicaragua
Running of the intern season

Technology is now faster than ever. Interns can be faster.
Decision days at the Supreme Court in June bring the traditional “running of the interns.”
In the SCOTUS press room, thick pamphlets are handed to reporters, then to interns waiting in the hallway.
Before a reporter could scan the entire decision and send it over to a correspondent, the intern has already left the courthouse and is running down Maryland Ave NE, headed for the Senate Swamp, where journalists like CNN Chief Legal Affairs Correspondent Paula Reid analyze the paper copies live on air.
The run takes an intern past photographers, other media setups, into a grass field in front of the Capitol and to the swamp – a term for the small area where impromptu press-conferences are held, and one of the few spots on Capitol grounds where tripods can be set up.
It’s all a reminder of how opaque the high court is. No cameras are allowed in the courtroom for arguments or opinions, so journalists are the first to tell the public what the justices have done.
Business groups warn of ruling’s serious economic consequences
The Supreme Court’s ruling that the Trump administration can end Temporary Protected Status for roughly 350,000 Haitians will hurt many businesses and workers – particularly in the elder care and hospitality industries, two business advocacy organizations said Thursday.
Nursing homes, assisted living facilities and homecare agencies expect they’ll have to replace many employees since a sizable share of them are Haitian TPS holders. That could cause stress and disruptions to care for many elderly Americans.
“Staff and caregivers who support older adults every day — legal employees who in some of our communities represent 8% or more of the entire workforce — can now lose their jobs overnight,” Katie Smith Sloan, CEO of LeadingAge, the national association of nonprofit and mission-driven providers of aging services, said in a statement.
Providers may have to limit nursing home admissions, close units or turn down requests for home care until the vacancies are filled, she continued.
Businesses in many industries will lose employees they rely on, Rebecca Shi, CEO of American Business Immigration Coalition Action, said in a statement.
“Today’s decision is a devastating setback for the hundreds of thousands of TPS holders who have built their lives in communities across America and, importantly, for our economy as we stand to lose long term, vetted and skilled workers in critical sectors from healthcare to hospitality to construction and beyond,” she said.
"This is a tragedy for Springfield, Ohio"
Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling on temporary protected status has catastrophic implications for many Haitians in the US who could now face deportation, and also for the communities where they live, a pastor in Springfield, Ohio, told reporters.
“This is a tragedy for Springfield, Ohio. We’re a city that had been in decline for 50 years. When Haitians arrived, that was the first time we grew in half a century. We went from being the fastest shrinking city in America to the fastest growing. And this undoes all of that progress,” said Pastor Carl Ruby of Central Christian Church.
An estimated 12,000-15,000 Haitians live in Springfield and have bolstered the city’s workforce. Ruby called the court’s ruling a “worst-case scenario” but said churches and others are committed to supporting Haitians there.
“We are a city that loves our neighbors, and I can’t overstate the commitment of the community to stand with Haitians who now are at risk for deportation and are not able to work, effective immediately,” he said. “That’s going to hurt businesses in Springfield. It’s going to lead to economic decline. It’s going to hurt our county. It’s just awful.”
Viles Dorsainvil, executive director of the Haitian Support Center in Springfield, said many are now bracing themselves for life without work permits and driver’s licenses. “That will put us in a very bad situation,” he said.
“I understand that now, being in America is dealing with a system that just don’t want you,” he added.
Community support helps, Dorsainvil said, but won’t stop Immigration and Customs Enforcement from deporting people or separating families.
“I used to know a US where human dignity was valued, justice was valued, but it’s no longer this,” he said.
Today's TPS ruling comes against the backdrop of deadly Venezuelan quakes
The Supreme Court’s decision on Temporary Protected Status on Thursday comes against the backdrop of twin quakes in Venezuela that have left at least 164 people dead and more than 900 injured.
It’s those types of natural disasters that, in previous years, the Department of Homeland Security secretary would consider in deciding whether Venezuelans already in the US should be extended deportation protections through TPS.
Haiti’s TPS designation, for example, originally stemmed from a 7.0-magnitude earthquake in 2010. At the time, DHS determined Haitian nationals already in the US should be granted temporary protections from being sent back to their origin country, given country conditions. That relief has been extended, given country conditions, until being terminated by the Trump administration.
Former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem moved to terminate TPS for Venezuelans in the United States. As of Thursday, DHS, which is now led by Secretary Markwayne Mullin, is not planning to reverse course and extend protections to Venezuelans in the US in the wake of this week’s earthquakes, according to a US official.
Justice Kagan slams majority for avoiding Trump’s words
In the case involving the removal of deportation protections for Haitians, the justices got into a sharp back and forth over President Donald Trump’s own words.
One of the claims the Haitian beneficiaries of temporary protected status had made was that the president had acted with racial animus in shutting down the program. That was based in part on his comments, including his false assertion during the campaign that Haitians in Ohio were eating peoples’ pets.
If the Haitians could have demonstrated that Trump’s remarks pointed to a decision driven by racism, then they could have won their claims under the equal protection clause.
But Alito and the court’s other conservatives dismissed that argument.
“A person without racial bias can provide a harshly unfavorable description of living conditions in some of the countries with TPS designations,” Alito wrote in the section of the opinion joined by only three of his colleagues. “The criteria for TPS designations guarantee that many, if not most, designated countries have such characteristics. Haiti is no exception. It is a very poor country, and living conditions there are unquestionably difficult.”
Notably, Alito did not reproduce Trump’s statements, which Justice Elena Kagan was quick to point out in her dissent.
Kagan then reproduced the statements herself, including Trump’s remarks that Haitians in Ohio were “eating the dogs … . They’re eating the cats. They’re eating—they’re eating the pets of the people.”
“The statements fairly shout, in their racial undertones and overtones alike, that race entered into the president’s resolve to remove Haitians from this country,” Kagan wrote.
These are the Supreme Court's biggest remaining cases
Five major cases remain pending with several days to go before the end of June.
CNN is tracking the key Supreme Court cases for the 2025-2026 term, which will have far-reaching implications for millions of Americans.
White House calls immigration decisions a ‘tremendous win’
The White House called the two immigration decisions handed down by the Supreme Court Thursday a “tremendous win” for the Trump administration.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the decision by the Supreme Court that it could not review the Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians was a “tremendous win” and “affirmed what President Trump has always maintained: temporary protected status is, by definition, temporary.”
“It was never intended to be a pathway to permanent status or legal residency and it is committed to the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security,” she said in a statement to CNN.
Jackson also praised the decision that clears the way for Trump to revive a controversial immigration policy called “metering.” The change would allow officials at the southern border to curb the number of asylum claims they must process by turning some migrants away before they touch US soil.
She said Trump is committed to “restoring integrity to our immigration system,” including “egregious abuses to our asylum system.”
Haitian plaintiffs warn of "violent, needless deaths"
The legal team representing a group of Haitian nationals that lost at the Supreme Court on Thursday warned that the decision would “directly result in thousands of innocent people dying violent, needless deaths.”
“It’s a very sad day, not only for Haitian TPS holders but for anyone who believes, as we do, that immigrants are one of America’s greatest strengths,” the lawyers said.
More Supreme Court opinions coming Monday

The Supreme Court will hand down additional opinions on Monday, but that will not be the final day of the term.
The court’s marshal announced after the last opinion Thursday that it would hand down more decisions Monday.
But perhaps more important was who didn’t speak. When the court is announcing its final opinion day of the term, that is announced by Chief Justice John Roberts.
There are eight cases still pending in the current term, including President Donald Trump’s bid to end automatic birthright citzenship, Trump’s effort to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, whether states can ban transgender athletes from playing on girls’ sports teams, and deadlines for mail-in ballots.
Alito fires back at Sotomayor after she reads dissent from the bench

Justice Samuel Alito fired back at Justice Sonia Sotomayor in a highly unusual and tense exchange on the bench Thursday after she had read her scathing dissent in one of his opinions.
Alito, who authored three of the four opinions the court released on Thursday, suggested that he didn’t realize that Sotomayor would read her dissent verbally — itself a rare situation.
The back-and-forth came amid signs of strife behind the curtain of the court as it veers toward its final days of the current term juggling a number of high-profile opinions involving President Donald Trump and culture war issues. The Alito-Sotomayor exchange was over a policy of turning asylum seekers away at the border, which the conservative majority blessed.
Alito seemed to be taken aback by Sotomayor’s strong language, and noted that two administrations had pursued the policy. The policy of “metering” asylum seekers began under former President Barack Obama but was formalized during Trump’s first term. The policy ended during former President Joe Biden’s administration and has not yet been reinstated.
Responding to Sotomayor after her bench statement, Alito described the asylum policy as “orderly and humane,” before turning to his next opinion.
That next opinion allowed the Trump administration to cancel temporary deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of Haitian and Syrian nationals.
Trump admin. has said it wants to keep controversial policy option on the table
The controversial asylum policy known as “metering” that the Supreme Court said was lawful has not been in effect in recent years. But the administration told the court earlier this year that it needed clarity on whether it could, in theory, reimplement the policy should conditions at the Southern border worsen.
“The administration would like to be able to reinstate metering if and when border conditions justify,” Assistant Solicitor General Vivek Suri told the court as it scrutinized the policy. “I cannot predict in advance what border conditions will look like or what specific policy responses the administration would take in response to that.”
The policy first started under President Barack Obama, was championed by Trump during his first term and later rescinded under President Joe Biden.
Court decides temporary immigration protection case by concluding it can’t decide

Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority in the case dealing with Temporary Protected Status, essentially said the Supreme Court couldn’t review whether the Trump administration had appropriately reviewed the status for Haitians and Syrians because the law bars courts from doing so.
“The secretary’s TPS designation decisions are not subject to judicial review,” Alito wrote for the court. “The text of the TPS judicial-review bar very clearly overcomes the general presumption in favor of judicial review.”
Alito also wrote the plaintiffs’ equal protection clause claim failed. The Haitian plaintiffs had argued that Trump’s comments about Haiti during his campaign demonstrated racial animosity.
“None of the cited statements by either the President or the Secretary was overtly racial, and in substance all expressed policy views that could rest on race-neutral justifications,” Alito wrote.
Sotomayor says “more people will die” under court’s asylum ruling

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent joined by the court’s other two liberals. Sotomayor, the court’s senior most liberal, took the unusual step of reading her opinion aloud from the bench.
“The consequences of today’s decision are predictable,” Sotomayor wrote.
In skewering her conservative colleagues over their decision, Sotomayor invoked a World War II-era episode during which the US turned away the MS St. Louis, a ship ferrying nearly 1,000 Jewish refugees fleeing Europe in 1939. The ship later returned to Europe, where many of the passengers perished in the Holocaust.
“If the refugees on the MS St. Louis were to walk up to a port of entry on our southern border today, the majority’s interpretation would allow immigration officers to refuse even to consider their asylum applications by physically blocking them from stepping foot onto US soil,” Sotomayor wrote.







