The latest on President Trump’s impeachment | CNN Politics

The latest on President Trump’s impeachment

Presidential candidates Andrew Yang, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar and Tom Steyer participate in the Democratic debate co-hosted by Politico and PBS Newshour in Los Angeles, California, on Thursday, December 19.
Watch 2020 Dems make the case for Trump's impeachment
1:33 • Source: CNN
Presidential candidates Andrew Yang, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar and Tom Steyer participate in the Democratic debate co-hosted by Politico and PBS Newshour in Los Angeles, California, on Thursday, December 19.
1:33

Where things stand now

  • The latest: The House has impeached President Trump, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not committed to sending the articles of impeachment to the Republican-held Senate.
  • What happens next: The Senate will eventually hold a trial to determine if Trump should be removed from office, but it can’t take up the issue until the House formally transmits the articles.
  • The significance: Trump is the third US president in history to be impeached. The House passed both articles of impeachment: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

Updates

(12)

Our live coverage has ended. You can scroll through the posts below to read more or follow CNN Politics.

Justice Department argues House no longer needs Mueller grand jury details after impeachment

The House should no longer need grand jury secrets from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation about President Trump following his impeachment, the Department of Justice argued in another filing to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals this afternoon.

The DOJ argued Trump was impeached for his dealings with Ukraine and not his attempts to obstruct the Mueller investigation or other Russia-related findings.

This argument comes in a series of federal appellate filings from the Justice Department and the House today, as they prepare to argue on Jan. 3 about the House’s access to the Mueller grand jury details and testimony of former White House counsel Don McGahn.

Meanwhile, Trump is at his golf resort today

As the impeachment trial stalemate continues, President Trump was spotted at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach this afternoon.

Trump is spending the holiday at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

Today’s trip to the golf resort marks the President’s 325th day at a Trump property and his 246th day at one of his golf clubs.

House tells court it still needs McGahn testimony for impeachment

The US House wrote to federal appellate judges this afternoon that it still seeks former White House counsel Don McGahn’s testimony in court because of the recent impeachment and the upcoming Senate trial — and that the investigation into whether President Trump obstructed justice continues and could result in more articles of impeachment if McGahn testifies.

McGahn has refused to testify to the House Judiciary Committee since April about what he witnessed Trump say and do regarding the Russia investigation. Mueller reported that McGahn spoke to prosecutors and the FBI several times about Trump’s direction to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, among other things.

“For example, if McGahn confirms to the Committee that the President ordered him to fire Special Counsel Mueller — an event that President Trump has publicly disputed — and then tried to cover it up, that testimony would constitute powerful evidence of the pattern of obstructive behavior described in the second Article,” the House wrote in the new court filing.

Separately, the House wrote, “If McGahn’s testimony produces new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the Articles approved by the House, the Committee will proceed accordingly — including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment.”

Politically, the possibility for more articles of impeachment against Trump seems unlikely at this time. But in court, the House has argued to keep the McGahn case alive so it can keep its investigative options open and gather more information during the Senate trial.

The House added that its Judiciary Committee is even considering legislation that could change how the White House and Justice Department interact regarding civil and criminal matters. The committee is also considering placing reporting requirements on “foreign offers of assistance,” according to the filing.

Today’s filing comes after the DC’s Circuit panel asked both the House and Justice Department to respond to recent developments in impeachment, before they court hears the McGahn case on Jan. 3. The Justice Department filed its written arguments just after midnight earlier today.

The administration lost the case before the lower court.

Both DOJ and the House have said today they don’t believe the impeachment of the President last week makes the McGahn case moot. But the Justice Department still wants the case thrown out by the appeals court, which would allow the administration to continue blocking House subpoenas because of what it calls the White House’s “absolute immunity.”

McConnell signals he doesn't expect progress on impeachment trial negotiations until next year

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell signaled he doesn’t expect much progress on negotiations over President Trump’s impeachment trial until the Senate returns next year. 

At a news conference with reporters today, McConnell said he expected to have a better sense of the state of the negotiations with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer once the Senate returns into session on Jan. 6.

McConnell has previously signaled he doesn’t expect much progress on the talks during the holidays. Earlier today, Schumer sent a letter to all senators calling for the Senate to obtain documents as part of the Senate trial, in addition to the witnesses Democrats are seeking.

Asked about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi waiting to formally send the articles of impeachment to the Senate, McConnell said: “We can’t take up a matter we don’t have. So hopefully it’ll be on the way over at some point.”

When asked about how impeachment might impact his own reelection, McConnell responded, “Who knows.”

Christianity Today subscriptions spiked after it called for Trump's removal, editor says

After it published an op-ed calling for President Trump’s removal for office, Christianity Today says it’s seen a boost in readership.

Mark Galli, the editor-in-chief of the leading evangelical publication, made the remarks during an interview with the Rev. Al Sharpton on MSNBC on Sunday.

The editorial, he said, divided readers — but support outweighed criticism.

Galli penned the condemnatory editorial for the magazine last week. In it, he criticized what he called Trump’s “grossly immoral character” and urged evangelicals to stop supporting him.

Read more here.

Schumer pushes for Ukraine documents at impeachment trial

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer sent a letter to all senators today detailing specific documents he wants produced for the Senate trial.

In his letter, Schumer noted that the House heard from an extensive group of witnesses in the impeachment inquiry, but investigators could not get access to most documents they sought because the administration defied congressional subpoenas.

He also noted in his letter today that on Dec. 15, he wrote Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell proposing that the Senate review new documentary evidence.

Included in the documents that Schumer cites as examples of what he’d like the Senate to obtain include newly revealed emails between Office of Management and Budget Associate Director Michael P. Duffey and the Department of Defense regarding the “holdup” of Ukrainian aid.

Here’s a part of his letter:

What happened in the hours after Trump's phone call with Ukraine's leader

Roughly 90 minutes after President Trump spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25, Trump’s political appointees at the White House’s budget office were already ordering the Pentagon to freeze security funding for Ukraine, newly released government documents show.

Here’s what we know about the timeline:

  • 9:03 a.m. ET: Trump’s call with Zelensky starts.
  • 9:33 a.m. ET: The call ends.
  • 11:04 a.m. ET: An email from Mike Duffey, the White House official in the Office of Management and Budget responsible for overseeing national security money and a Trump political appointee, is time stamped (That same email also appears elsewhere in the same batch released Friday with a 3:03 p.m. time stamp.)

Trump is tweeting about Nancy Pelosi this morning

President Trump lashed out at Democrats on Twitter this morning, once again accusing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of treating him unfairly during impeachment proceedings. 

The President begins the holiday week at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. He has no public events on his schedule today.

McConnell again says he's not anxious to have an impeachment trial

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was on Fox and Friends this morning where he discussed the impeachment impasse between House and the Senate.

McConnell reiterated that he is not anxious to have the impeachment trial and that the Senate can’t do anything until the articles of impeachment are brought over from the House.

He said he is advocating for the same process in the Senate that was used in the impeachment of President Clinton. If that process was good enough for Chuck Schumer in 1999, it should be good enough now, he said.

Trump administration says courts shouldn’t weigh in on Don McGahn testimony lawsuit now

In a late-night court filing, the Justice Department argued to the federal appeals court in Washington that the courts should stay out of the fight between the House and the administration over former White House counsel Don McGahn’s testimony — especially now that the Senate will try the President for obstructing Congress from questioning administration witnesses.

Why this matters: The filing comes in one of the most potentially significant court cases that could be resolved during the Trump impeachment proceedings.

The DOJ, arguing for McGahn, says that the impeachment votes against President Trump last week don’t make the McGahn lawsuit immediately moot, because he was subpoenaed months before the House investigated Trump for his pressure on Ukraine. But the impeachment vote now means a quick resolution to McGahn’s case is no longer necessary, the DOJ attorneys write. 

What happens next: A three-judge panel on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals is set to hear oral arguments in the case on Jan. 3.

The House Judiciary Committee says it has needed McGahn to testify since April as part of a possible impeachment inquiry of the President related to obstruction of justice.

Trump’s attempts to obstruct the Russia investigation — about which McGahn is a key witness — aren’t part of the articles of impeachment against Trump. Yet the House voted to impeach him for obstructing Congress, including not allowing former White House officials to testify to Congress. Trump has used the same reasoning, absolute immunity for the top officials around the President, to block McGahn and witnesses in the Ukraine dealings from testifying.

A ruling from the appeals court endorsing or striking down the White House’s immunity assertions could impact a Senate trial, no matter its focus.

Some context: Historically, federal courts try to stay out of clashes between the executive branch and Congress, or Congress and the Justice Department have negotiated before an appeals court could settle other disputes over administration witnesses. Yet a trial-level judge in Washington ruled recently that McGahn would have to testify, because the White House couldn’t claim a blanket immunity to override a congressional subpoena of a former official.

President Trump was impeached last week. Here's what happens next.

The House voted last Wednesday to approve two articles of impeachment against President Trump — obstruction of Congress and abuse of power.

The House and Senate are now in recess for the holidays. Here’s where things stand:

  • The House hasn’t sent the case to the Senate yet: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would not commit to sending the articles of impeachment against Trump to the Republican-held Senate. The Senate will eventually hold a trial to determine if Trump should be removed from office, but can’t take up the issue until the House formally transmits the articles.
  • A key point: Pelosi told reporters that she was waiting for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to cut a deal first on the rules that would govern the Senate trial before she sends over the articles.
  • Next month: We’re not sure when McConnell and Schumer will decide on trial rules and when the House will send over the articles of impeachment. However, even before Trump was impeached, McConnell had said the Senate would hold the trial in the new year. House Democrats are privately preparing for a trial to begin as soon as the week of Jan. 6. 

READ MORE

READ MORE