The latest on the Trump impeachment inquiry

President Trump mischaracterized why congressional testimony from an anonymous whistleblower is growing unlikely and attacked the House impeachment inquiry in a series of tweets tonight.

The attorneys for the whistleblower who lodged a complaint with the intelligence community inspector general related to Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukraine’s President wrote in a Washington Post op-ed today that there is no need for their client to testify in person, even behind closed doors.  

Andrew Bakaj and Mark Zaid argue that their client’s anonymity needs to be protected and say he has no additional information to offer about the call, writing: “Because our client has no additional information about the president’s call, there is no justification for exposing their identity and all the risks that would follow.” 

In a separate tweet, Trump attack the impeachment process, calling it a scam.

The President also floated the idea of suing Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff. Trump has brought this up numerous times.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called today’s court ruling ordering the Department of Justice to release grand jury information redacted from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation to Congress “another blow to President Trump’s attempt to put himself above the law.” 

Pelosi noted that the federal judge wrote, “Tipping the scale even further toward disclosure is the public’s interest in a diligent and thorough investigation into, and in a final determination about, potentially impeachable conduct by the President described in the Mueller report.” 

She continued: “The court challenges the administration’s unprecedented, blanket defiance of Congress’s oversight.”

Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s personal lawyer, left two apparently unintended voicemails on a reporter’s phone this fall in which he discussed his need for hundreds of thousands of dollars and disparaged the Biden family, NBC reported on today.

The unwitting calls and messages from Giuliani, colloquially called “buttdials,” come as sources tell CNN that Giuliani has been approaching defense attorneys for possible representation following escalating reports regarding a federal investigation into his dealings in Ukraine.

“Tomorrow, I’ve got to get you on Bahrain. You’ve got to call,” Giuliani tells an unidentified associate in an Oct. 16 voicemail posted by NBC.

“The problem is we need some money,” Giuliani later adds when referencing a “Robert” who the unidentified associate said was in Turkey, pausing for several seconds before specifying, “We need a few hundred thousand.”

Giuliani told CNN’s Dana Bash today that the voicemail is “helpful because it shows that I don’t do anything dishonest,” saying it was completely unrelated to anything in Ukraine but declined to specify to what it was related.

“The $200,000 is for another project in another country,” Giuliani said. He called the project a “non-legal security matter” completely unrelated to anything related to Ukraine or Trump, but declined to specify what it was related to.

Giuliani said that the call pertained to a “change in personnel on a different project” that “will require an additional charge for the client.”

Giuliani has some previous ties to Bahrain, a key ally of Saudi Arabia. His former massive law firm Bracewell Giuliani previously worked on financial deals for Bahrain.

Keep reading here.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo seemed to voice subdued approval of the work of the top US diplomat in Ukraine whose testimony undermined the administration claims that President Trump had not pushed for investigations into his political rivals in exchange for US aid.

Pompeo said he and Bill Taylor, the charge d’affaires in Kiev, are “in full accord” on US policy there, but did not specifically address a question about his confidence in the diplomat himself.

Pompeo, conducting interviews over a two-day visit in Kansas, has been dismissive and evasive of questions surrounding the House Democratic impeachment probe, despite his department’s increasing entrenchment in that inquiry.

He sought to downplay the impeachment inquiry as Beltway “noise” in a series of interviews in Wichita, Kansas, on Thursday and Friday — just days after Taylor presented damning testimony related to a quid pro quo underlying presidential lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s efforts in Ukraine.

Some background: In his closed-door deposition Tuesday, Taylor said he had been told that “everything” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wanted, including a White House meeting and military aid to the country, would be held up until he publicly announced the launch of investigations sought by Trump.

Mark Sanford, Republican presidential challenger and former South Carolina congressman, told CNN he supports censuring President Trump over impeaching him.

He went on to say that the impeachment process “is fraught with a number of different perils, both for our Republic, and debate in this republic and for the Democratic party and ultimately for what comes next in the world of politics.”

Sanford said he thinks the House will likely vote to impeach Trump and the Senate will acquit the President.

Watch the moment:

In today’s latest episode of “The Daily DC: Impeachment Watch” podcast, CNN Political Director David Chalian covers:

Chalian is joined by CNN national security reporter Jeremy Herb and Alice Stewart, a CNN political commentator and Republican strategist.

Listen to the podcast here.

The Department Justice said it is reviewing a federal court decision that it must release grand jury information redacted from the Mueller report to the House Judiciary Committee by Oct. 30.

“We are reviewing the decision,” a spokesperson said.

About the decision: The ruling is a blow to the Trump administration’s claims that the House is not conducting a valid impeachment inquiry since there’s been no formal vote to authorize the probe.

In a lengthy opinion, Chief Judge Beryl Howell of the US District Court in Washington, DC, said the House clearly is conducting an impeachment inquiry.

“(A)n impeachment trial is an exercise of judicial power,” Howell wrote. “Contrary to (the Justice Department’s) position — and as historical practice, the Federalist Papers, the text of the Constitution, and Supreme Court precedent all make clear — impeachment trials are judicial in nature and constitute judicial proceedings.”

Here are the latest developments in the House impeachment inquiry into President Trump:

A federal appeals court on Friday asked the House to respond to President Trump’s request to rehear a case concerning a subpoena to his longtime accounting firm. 

The request from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals suggests a larger panel of judges on the court is at least interested in whether it should rehear the case. It also could potentially delay Supreme Court review. 

What’s this all about: Trump has asked the DC Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear his attempt to stop a subpoena of his accounting firm, this time with the President asking the full appellate court to reconsider his case.

Trump lost his attempt to stop the House subpoena of accounting firm Mazars USA before a trial-level judge and 2-1 before an appellate panel. The courts so far have shot down Trump’s attempts to impede Congress’ subpoena power.

The subpoena of Mazars, still halted in the appeals process, is one of several attempts by the House to dig up more financial records of Trump’s. This subpoena was for eight years of documents held by his accounting firm.

In a lengthy opinion, Chief Judge for the DC District Court Beryl Howell found in favor of the House’s arguments, writing that the House impeachment inquiry is a judicial proceeding, and that “to avoid a possible injustice in the impeachment inquiry, that this need for disclosure is greater than the need for continued secrecy.” 

Howell further writes, “The need for continued secrecy is minimal and thus easily outweighed” by the committee’s “compelling need for the material.” She adds, “Tipping the scale even further toward disclosure is the public’s interest in a diligent and thorough investigation into, and in a final determination about, potentially impeachable conduct by the President described in the Mueller Report.”

The ruling is significant because the Trump administration has argued that such material should not be turned over because it says the House is not conducting a valid impeachment inquiry since there’s been no vote to authorize the probe. 

But Howell sided with Democrats and said clearly that the House is conducting an impeachment inquiry.

“This stance, in service of the obvious goal of blocking Congress from accessing grand jury material for any purpose, overlooks that an impeachment trial is an exercise of judicial power,” Howell said.

Howell noted that the House Judiciary Committee says “it needs the material to conduct a fair impeachment investigation based on all relevant facts.” She then declared, “Impeachment based on anything less than all relevant evidence would compromise the public’s faith in the process.”

CNN’s Joan Biskupic contributed to this report.