What's happening here
- CNN Opinion asked commentators to weigh in on Thursday’s Democratic Presidential debate for 2020.
- Follow the commentary here to get the latest opinions and updates.
- The views expressed are those of the authors.

With each debate, former Vice President Joe Biden’s performance has improved. He handled the predictable incoming questions much better than past debates with greater passion and authenticity. Biden finally began to remind voters of his experience and accomplishments, not only as a senator, but as vice president, proudly serving at the side of the Democrats’ most popular living president. No one else in this race has that resume.
Going forward, Biden needs to continue to focus on his proven ability to get things done, his readiness to lead on day one and his ability to restore normalcy to the presidency. He may have flubbed a few answers, but I attribute that more to the debate format than his competency. The bigger picture is what matters – not nitpicking at inconsequential gaffes.
When he’s speaking from the heart, rather than as a policy wonk, Biden thrives. His final answer of the evening about personal setbacks was a perfect example. Biden was relaxed, empathetic, personally raw and relatable. Biden’s campaign needs to put him in more situations that showcase these attributes. There’s a reason the former vice president is the frontrunner and his camp must capitalize on those assets. The country is crying out for decency, stability and respectability to once again occupy the Oval Office.
Now that the third debate is in the books, it’s clearly time to pare the debate stage down. Too many candidates vying for time and viral moments has, at times, led the debates to devolve into reality TV style catfights. Julian Castro’s obnoxious display drew justifiable castigation from his fellow Democratic rivals, specifically Mayor Pete and Senator Klobuchar. Taking cheap shots at one another for superficial applause or virtual high fives on social media isn’t going to help anyone defeat Donald Trump.
Tara Setmayer is a former GOP communications director, host of the “Honestly Speaking with Tara” podcast and a CNN political contributor.

If you had been paying no attention to Democratic politics until Thursday night and then watched the full three hours of debate, you would probably have had a hard time figuring out who the frontrunners are. Indeed, it often seemed that the second tier candidates were the more compelling.
Cory Booker and Kamala Harris both came charging out of the gate in the opening round, Booker in passionate calls for unity, and Harris looking straight into the camera with a scathing attack on Donald Trump. Amy Klobuchar and especially Pete Buttigieg were both highly effective in arguing that Democrats should trust Americans to make their own choices on health insurance.
Beto O’Rourke was gripping on gun control, and Julian Castro — despite what appeared to be a nasty swipe at Joe Biden–had a generally smooth performance as well, especially on policy questions.
One wondered if the lower tier candidates, knowing their chances have been dimming, had the good sense to relax and be more themselves (always a good idea on television). In contrast, the three front runners — Biden, Elizabeth Warren, and Bernie Sanders — seemed rushed and frequently defensive. They were on top of the facts but they tried to stuff too much into their answers. All three are better in one-on-one TV interviews when they are less hot and more conversational.
Democratic commentators were mostly gleeful after the debate. There were indeed moments they could celebrate. But they are kidding themselves if they think any of the candidates is yet ready to slug it out with Trump. Just for starters, it is still devilishly difficult to know how much their promises will cost and how they will be paid for by just taxing the rich. If they wait much longer to define their budget plans, they will find Republicans defining them for them — and it won’t be pleasant.
Bottom line: this third debate probably didn’t change the basic dynamics of the race. But it did give some hope to second tier candidates: a couple of them could make a vice presidential short list — and one of them may still catch fire before Iowa and New Hampshire.
David Gergen has been a White House adviser to four presidents and is a senior political analyst at CNN. A graduate of Harvard Law School, he is a professor of public service and founding director of the Center for Public Leadership at the Harvard Kennedy School.

Round three of the Democratic presidential debate was devoid of knockout punches, but full of jabs on health care, gun control, and immigration. With the primary goal to energize the base and motivate moderates, Thursday night’s debate did not move the “record player” needle one bit in terms of top tier candidates.
After spending previous debates smack dab in the crosshairs, former Vice President Joe Biden flipped the script, putting Sen. Bernie Sanders and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren on defense over how to pay for their Medicare-for-All plans. Neither had a strong answer. In politics: if you’re on the defense, you’re losing.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar was solid in taking it to Sanders and his Medicare-for-All bill, saying it’s not a bold idea, “it’s a bad idea,” and making her case that she wants to be a president for “all of the country.”
Sen. Kamala Harris spent the most time taking it directly to President Donald Trump on health care and denoucing his divisive rhetoric. One thing’s for sure, referring to him as a “small dude” will guarantee she is next in line for a Trump-style nickname.
Sen. Cory Booker and former Texas Congressman Beto O’Rourke took turns calling President Trump a racist. O’Rourke went on to blame Trump for inciting the gunman in last month’s mass shooting in El Paso that killed 22 people. Furthering his call for gun confiscations, O’Rourke said “hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47.”
Mayor Pete Buttigieg delivered another strong argument in his “Medicare for all who want it” message by stressing that a public alternative will ensure “the American people will figure that out for themselves.”
Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro took a cheap shot at Biden on his age and memory, by implying Biden could not remember something he said moments earlier. It was a calculated risk that failed. Policy differences are one thing, getting personal is another. Plus, if you’re going to deliver a low blow, be right on the facts. Castro was not.
Entrepreneur Andrew Yang had me, yet again, wondering how he has garnered the support he has. His gimmick to give 10 families $1,000 a month from his campaign will no doubt build an email list, but it will also have difficulty passing the campaign finance law smell test.
The challenge moving forward is for Democrats to continue to highlight their divisions on policy without hindering the inevitable call for unity in the party. It’s a delicate dance of primaries. As of now, there is no clear candidate who has demonstrated they have what it takes to take on President Trump.
Alice Stewart is a CNN political commentator, Resident Fellow at the Kennedy Institute of Politics at Harvard University, and former Communications Director for Ted Cruz for President.

We are now in an era where every major Democratic candidate for the presidency is competing for the boldest plans to fix a failing criminal justice system that tears apart too many families and destroys too many lives.
Democrats have not always stood boldly against the incarceration industry. There was a time when candidates for office up and down the ballot would compete over who could be tougher on crime. But in this election, Democrats are competing to offer more freedom, more compassion, and more rehabilitation - not just more punishment.
On Thursday’s debate stage, in response to a question posed by a young African-American moderator, Linsey Davis, a few candidates finally got a moment on the debate stage to highlight their criminal justice plans.
● Sen. Kamala Harris: “My plan has been described by activists as being a bold and comprehensive plan that is about ending mass incarceration, about taking the profit out of the criminal justice system. I plan on shutting down for-profit prisons on day one. It will be about what we need to do to hold law enforcement, including prosecutors, accountable. And finally, my plan is about making sure that, in America’s criminal justice system, we de-incarcerate women and children, that we end solitary confinement and that we work on keeping families intact.”
● Sen. Cory Booker: “I joined together and led in the United States Senate the only major bipartisan bill to pass under this president, for criminal justice reform, that has already led to thousands of people coming out of jail. If 87 members of the United States Senate says that these sentences are way too long, and we changed it, but we didn’t make it retroactive, we could literally point to the people that are in jail unjustly right now. Everyone on this stage should say that we are going to give clemency to these 17,000 people. And I challenge you. Don’t just say a big statement; back it up with details of the people in prison right now looking for one of the most sacrosanct ideals of this nation, which is liberty and freedom. We need to reform this system and we must do it now. Every day we wait is too long.”
● Joe Biden: “We’re in a situation now where there are so many people who are in jail and shouldn’t be in jail. The whole means by which this should change is the whole model has to change. We should be talking about rehabilitation. Nobody should be in jail for a nonviolent crime. As – when we were in the White House, we released 36,000 people from the federal prison system. Nobody should be in jail for a drug problem. They should be going directly to a rehabilitation. We build more rehabilitation centers, not prisons.
● Sen. Amy Klobuchar: “As a senator and as your president, I will make sure that we don’t just do the First Step Act when it comes to criminal sentencing, that we move to the Second Step Act, which means the 90% of people that are incarcerated in local and state jails, let’s reduce those sentences for nonviolent offenders and let’s get them jobs and let them vote when they get out of prison”
The tide is certainly changing - I even saw a few Republicans agreeing with what was said on stage. After the passage of last year’s First Step Act, which saw close to 100% of Democrats in Congress voting in favor of criminal justice legislation that President Donald Trump signed into law, this issue is ripe for progress.
Seventy million Americans with a criminal conviction, 10 -12 million cycling through jails every year, 4.65 million on probation, parole and community supervision, and 2.2 million behind bars - there are many more steps and much more work to be done.
Van Jones is the host of the “The Van Jones Show” and a CNN political commentator. He is the CEO of the REFORM Alliance.

Senator Cory Booker had a great night. Clearly he was having the most fun on stage. He was passionate and informed about the issues many voters care about most: health care and justice reform. He was poised, sticking to policy and offering solutions instead of wasting time attacking his fellow Democrats – take notes Julian Castro.
And in a nice respite, the New Jersey senator gave us much-needed comic relief all night. I mean, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s perfectly-coiffed hair really is a bit “menacing,” as Booker joked.
Booker, more than any Democrat on that stage, was able to make us feel the humanity and urgency of the complex issues before voters. Over and over he brought the talk back around to everyday Americans. Debating the merits of Medicare for All and other health care plans, Booker reminded us that there are children in his community who need affordable insulin, “right now.” They can’t wait years.
If this election were only about breaking down systemic racism and passing expansive justice reform laws, Booker would get my vote in a second. But while those are top concerns for me – and many other voters – they won’t decide my vote.
Booker may get bounce from his debate performance, but it’s hard to imagine it will be enough to earn him a top spot. Still, it makes me hopeful for the nation that there is a candidate with a unifying voice like his who can see the humanity in us all.
Roxanne Jones, a founding editor of ESPN Magazine and former vice president at ESPN, has been a producer, reporter and editor at the New York Daily News and The Philadelphia Inquirer. Jones is co-author of “Say it Loud: An Illustrated History of the Black Athlete.” She talks politics, sports and culture weekly on Philadelphia’s 900AM WURD.
Andrew Yang’s stunt of giving money to voters out of his campaign account is wild, and probably illegal. Of course, most of the Democratic candidates’ policies (free college, full debt retirement, free health care for undocumented immigrants) are indirect bribes already. I guess Yang has decided to stop beating around the bush and just go for it.
Scott Jennings, a CNN contributor, is a former special assistant to President George W. Bush and former campaign adviser to Sen. Mitch McConnell. He is a partner at RunSwitch Public Relations in Louisville, Kentucky. Follow him on Twitter @ScottJenningsKY.

For the first time, the socialists were on their heels and the moderates were on the attack. In the ABC debate, we finally had a vigorous, honest debate about Medicare for All. Gone were the disingenuous digs of prior debates (“You’re repeating Republican talking points!”) In their place was a substantive critique about cost, choice, and banning employer-provided health care.
Joe Biden had his best debate. He used stats (“My plan for health care costs a lot of money… It doesn’t cost $30 trillion.”) and wit (“For a socialist, you’ve got a lot more confidence in corporate America than I do”). Those who worry about Biden’s ability to stand up to Donald Trump, fear not. Biden more than held his own against both Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren – each of whom is 10 times smarter than Trump.
Kamala Harris did the best job of consistently taking the fight to Trump, a better strategy than fly-specking rivals’ campaign proposals that are never going to become law. Instead of merely talking about taking on Trump, then attacking her fellow Democrats, she actually did hammer Trump. I wonder if her strategy was to bait Trump into another Twitter meltdown.
Beto O’Rourke and Amy Klobuchar came from the back of the pack to shine. They showed authenticity, decency, and passion. When Pete Buttigieg spoke about coming out as a Navy officer, it was riveting. Cory Booker was the wit and the conscience of the group, but then went against his better angels by personally attacking Joe Biden in the post-debate spin room.
Julian Castro was by far the loser. Not even close. He dishonestly and dishonorably implied that Biden was losing his marbles. Three times he repeated a charge that Biden was “forgetting what you said two minutes ago.” The charge was low – and false. One hopes Castro will look back on this night with regret when his campaign is over. One suspects that ending will arrive sooner after that disgraceful crack.
Paul Begala, a Democratic strategist and CNN political commentator, was a political consultant for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign in 1992 and was counselor to Clinton in the White House.
In their conversation about race and criminal justice, tonight’s Democratic presidential debaters left out important facts about the historic gains for African-Americans under the leadership of the Trump White House.
The Trump administration worked with both parties in Congress to pass the criminal justice reform of the First Step Act. Since then, 91% of of the first group of people who have received reduced sentences under the act have been African-American.
In August, black unemployment fell to a record low 5.5%, with the Census Bureau reporting that inequality is declining and that the median wages for all Americans are increasing. The black poverty rate hit a new record low of 20.8% in 2018, with the White House Council of Economic Advisers reporting that the “poverty rates for black and Hispanic Americans in 2018 have never been closer to the overall poverty rate in the United States.”
President Donald Trump recently announced that faith-based historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) with religious affiliations “will no longer be restricted from accessing federal funding.” His Education Department also forgave $322 million in loans made to four HBCUs damaged in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The Trump White House led the way to create Opportunity Zones to reinvigorate business development in nearly 9,000 economically-challenged communities, and nearly half of all HBCUs are located in Opportunity Zones.
Democrats have tried to drive a racial wedge in our country, but the facts tell a different story.
Carrie Sheffield is national editor for Accuracy in Media, a conservative media watchdog organization.

We learned a lot of things in tonight’s Democratic debate in Houston. The first? Three hours is too long. Even the most hardened political activists and junkies, I think, struggled to hang in for that last hour. But it was worth it for those who did: the closing question on resilience provided some of the most interesting answers of the night.
The second lesson is that 10 candidates is better than 20. The criteria that winnowed the field made this a better debate. Apart from Andrew Yang’s gimmicky opening, it was a serious debate on serious issues from serious people.
The big winners tonight were the candidates who are just out of the first tier. Beto O’Rourke and Cory Booker proved there is something to their potential, even if it has not translated to support in the polls. Amy Klobuchar, Pete Buttegieg and Kamala Harris were solid and did nothing to suggest they won’t be around by the time the Iowa caucuses begin.
Among the frontrunners, Joe Biden showed more life in the first couple of hours than in any other debate. He also showed a little weariness in the third hour – and a couple of flaky answers – but I think that will be forgiven by everyone who stuck around for all three hours. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders did little to distinguish themselves from each other and that is going to continue to be a problem for both of them.
Julian Castro’s ham-handed attack on Biden – questioning his short-term memory – made him tonight’s big loser. It didn’t work, and time has run out on him. Andrew Yang remains a novelty who fills time and gets a few laughs but adds little to the debate.
As far as where this leaves us, Biden will remain the frontrunner and Warren and Sanders will continue to be his strongest and closest contenders. The big story tonight though is there are still a bunch of candidates in the single digits who still have a realistic shot at winning this nomination. That will make the next debate compelling.
Joe Lockhart was White House press secretary from 1998-2000 in President Bill Clinton’s administration. He co-hosts the podcast “Words Matter.”

If Joe Biden has mentioned Barack Obama more than a few times tonight, you can hardly blame him. Biden’s position as the frontrunner in this race is due in no small part to his close partnership with Obama.
Biden leads his competitors among African-American voters by better than a three-to-one margin, a potentially critical advantage in a nominating contest in which black voters will cast a quarter of the votes. The black vote saved Hillary Clinton in 2016 against Bernie Sanders. It could be crucial for Biden.
Beyond his iconic status among African-Americans, Obama remains a hugely popular figure among Democrats, even if there is disquiet among some of the left about aspects of his record. (I suspect that the candidates who implicitly attacked Obama in the last debate learned in the aftermath just how deep Democratic affection remains for the former president; tonight, candidates were much less willing to attack Obama’s policies.)
The former vice president might well be overdoing it — but there is a lot of upside to touting his friend, the former president.
Biden stumbled momentarily, seemingly cutting Obama loose when asked by Univision’s Jorge Ramos whether the former president had erred by deporting three million people. “I was the vice president,” Biden stressed.
Julián Castro jumped on the VP over this apparent vacillation, accusing Biden of claiming credit for Obama’s popular decisions and walking away from controversial ones. Realizing the misstep, Biden quickly and vehemently declared that he stood with Obama on his entire record.
He knows that he will rise or fall with the president who brought him to the dance.
David Axelrod, a senior CNN political commentator and host of “The Axe Files,” was senior adviser to President Barack Obama and chief strategist for the 2008 and 2012 Obama presidential campaigns.

Many pundits will focus on Joe Biden beating expectations (maybe), Andrew Yang providing eye-catching moments, and Kamala Harris regaining her momentum. But it was Elizabeth Warren who quietly turned in the best performance, given her campaign strategy.
While many people were waiting for Warren to start delivering zingers against Biden and Bernie Sanders, that is not her style. Her strategy has been relatively consistent: stick to her issues, stick to her personal story, and keep weaving the two together.
The truth is that the strategy probably won’t win her any big swings in the short-term polls, but over the long run it has been a strategy that has worked. Her numbers all keep pointing in the same direction: upward. Of all the candidates, she has kept growing her support and inching closer to Biden’s standing.
Warren is making an Obama-like bet, circa 2008, which is to ignore the noise and avoid trying to find the big breakthrough moments.
It is a big and risky bet in an age when the 24-hour news media is such a major presence, creating opportunities for campaign booms and busts.
But at least, so far, it is working. Focusing on policy, focusing on her message, focusing on her life story, focusing on issue-based statements has allowed her to run a formidable campaign.
The question remains: can she turn all of this into an argument that she in fact the most “electable” Democrat in the group? She needs to close the circle by the time the party reaches Iowa and New Hampshire, to establish for voters that substance, passion, and a coherent agenda are in fact what will make for the most electable candidate against President Trump. Otherwise, Biden will remain the favorite.
A number of other candidates, particularly Harris, had some of their best moments tonight. But right now it’s hard to see how they break into the top tier of three without the long awaited, but not yet arrived, Biden implosion.
Julian Zelizer, a CNN political analyst, is a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University, and author of the forthcoming book, “Burning Down the House: Newt Gingrich, the Fall of a Speaker, and the Rise of the New Republican Party.”
Two hours into the Democratic debate, candidates had spoken passionately about health care, racism, criminal justice reform, mass shootings, and immigration and deportations. We’ve seen many of the candidates grow passionate and sometimes angry speaking about these problems. These are certainly crucial issues. But climate change and the environment are crucial, too. And until moderator Jorge Ramos read aloud a reader’s question about the climate, it had scarcely been mentioned.
Based on the questions during the first two hours of tonight’s debate, one might conclude that climate change was a low priority for Democratic voters — but that’s simply not true. In fact, one recent poll reported that 82% of Democratic voters identified climate change as a “very important” priority, compared to 75% for universal health care and 65% for stricter gun control.
I’m inclined to blame the moderators, because the only question about climate and the green economy came from a viewer. Maybe the moderators think that Democratic voters aren’t mobilized around these questions. Maybe they think that, unlike health care, climate isn’t a bread-and butter issue, or that, unlike gun violence, it’s not a life-and-death issue. But it’s both.
Climate change is already costing the American people money, and, as the events surrounding Hurricane Dorian showed us, it’s costing lives, too. Climate change did eventually come up — but given how little time we have to address the problem, it’s fair to ask why the moderators didn’t bring it up earlier.
Naomi Oreskes is a member of the board of Protect Our Winters, a non-profit fighting climate change, and the author of the forthcoming book, “Why Trust Science?”

The first Democratic debate featuring all the top candidates is turning into a fine night for the front runner – and for the Democratic Party.
It’s clear that former Vice President Joe Biden spent the break between debates training to become a much better debater. It shows. The new Biden beamed with optimism with his opening statement, quoting John F. Kennedy’s “I refuse to postpone,” as he launched an ambitious agenda for America. But the sunny disposition did not keep him from going aggressively against his challengers, questioning the cost of their proposals, particularly on health care.
Biden seemed sharp, alert and downright sprightly as he stood next to a hoarse Sen. Bernie Sanders, who some on social media thought might be fighting a cold.
The night was a win for the Democratic Party. That’s because candidates repeatedly reminded viewers that despite their differences, the men and women jousting for the presidential nomination embrace views that align more closely with theirs.
In the midst of the health care debate, Sen. Kamala Harris pointed out that “everyone on this stage” wanted to make sure all Americans have health care. And amid a debate on how to tackle gun violence, Sen. Amy Klobuchar pointed out that, “everyone on this stage wants to ban assault weapons,” in contrast to Republicans. That, she said, “is another thing that unites us.”
The discussions were spirited, but one could picture (almost) all the candidates working together to achieve what, in effect, are common goals. With the exception of Julian Castro, who came across as desperate and mean-spirited, they looked like a group that might get together to share a meal – or win an election.
Frida Ghitis, a former CNN producer and correspondent, is a world affairs columnist. She is a frequent opinion contributor to CNN, a contributing columnist to the Washington Post and a columnist for World Politics Review. Follow her on Twitter @fridaghitis.

For the first time, the top candidates vying for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020 are on the same stage in Houston tonight. The big question is whether this Texas showdown will move the needle in any significant way for Biden, Warren, Sanders – and all the rest. Each candidate brings something unique and valuable to the table, but the lower-polling candidates desperately need either a breakout moment that sets propels them to the top tier. About 40 minutes in, Kamala Harris is showing the best way forward: focusing on Donald Trump.
Harris addressed her opening statement directly to the president: “What you don’t get is that the American people are so much better than this,” she said, before dismissing the President by telling him to go back to watching Fox News (snap!). Later, in the middle of a hard-to-follow discussion about the candidates’ respective health care plans, Harris again cut to the chase. She reminded viewers that the current administration is currently trying to dismantle the Affordable Care Act. “This discussion is giving the American people a headache,” she declared. She got that right!
At this early stage, Democratic voters are trying to decide who can best take on Trump. Harris seems eager to make the case that she can, by bringing him into the debate as much as she can. Instead of fighting against her fellow candidates, tonight she has her eyes on the prize.
Raul A.Reyes is an attorney and member of the USA Today board of contributors. Follow him on Twitter @RaulAReyes.

On the eve of the first debate, Medicare for All seemed to be on a fast track to the Democratic platform in 2020. It was presented as the only moral choice.
Tonight the reverse was true.
Former Vice President Joe Biden wasn’t the only one who pushed back. Senator Amy Klobuchar warned against Americans losing the ability to have private insurance and Mayor Pete Buttegieg made a moral argument: “The problem is that it doesn’t trust the American people. I trust you to choose what makes the most sense for you.”
Expanding health care coverage and lowering costs will be a pillar of the platform for every Democratic candidate. And that will stand in stark contrast to Donald Trump’s desire to destroy the Affordable Care Act. Tonight we were all reminded there are many paths to get there.
Jen Psaki, a CNN political commentator, was the White House communications director and State Department spokeswoman during the Obama administration. She is vice president of communications and strategy at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Follow her at @jrpsaki.

Julian Castro just effectively ended his bid for President. Usually adept at navigating these debates and using his time to his advantage, tonight he looked petty, puerile and, well, like a jerk.
Attacking Biden – more than once – for “forgetting” what he’d just said was a not subtle (and fairly dishonest) attempt at making Biden look feeble and out of it. Then, flatly declaring that, through their respective health care plans, he was carrying out Obama’s legacy and Biden wasn’t was an ugly, personal and unnecessary attack to make his point.
Then, to make matters worse, the youngest candidate in the group, Pete Buttigieg, emerged as the adult in the room to scold Castro for his attacks, and Castro’s response was, “It’s called a Democratic debate.”
This isn’t what people came to see. Castro doesn’t have the national admiration and support Biden has built over decades – he can’t afford for his few debate moments to hit such low notes. He just trash talked himself right out of the Democratic primary.
SE Cupp is a CNN political commentator and the host of “SE Cupp Unfiltered.”

For all the progress Elizabeth Warren has made during in this campaign, she still has work to do to break through with working-class voters, white and black. She has built impressive support among college-educated white voters, upscale liberals and the young. Still, though many of her economic proposals are designed to benefit the middle class and the poor, including the large expansion of Social Security she unveiled today, she’s trailing both Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders by eight points among white voters without a college degree.
Biden also has a nearly four-to-one lead over Warren among African-American voters.
So Thursday’s debate in Houston is a propitious homecoming for Warren, whose extraordinary personal journey has roots there. It offers her a chance to shed the hint of elitism that goes along with her status as a longtime Harvard law professor.
Thus it isn’t surprising that early in this debate, Warren has used the setting to recall her early years as a young mother, scraping to put herself through college to become a teacher.
Warren’s story—her hardscrabble youth in Oklahoma, her years in Houston and, later, as single mother, working her way through law school—is not universally known. Sharing it more often could help lessen the distance between her and the folks who have yet to embrace her candidacy.
If working-class voters come to see Warren as someone who understands struggle because she’s lived it — and less as a know-it-all law prof with all the plans and answers — she will add even more momentum to her formidable bid for the nomination.
David Axelrod, a senior CNN political commentator and host of “The Axe Files,” was senior adviser to President Barack Obama and chief strategist for the 2008 and 2012 Obama presidential campaigns.