Here are some of the key issues that arose from the Tuesday’s hearing:
Silicon Valley Bank customers
New details that emerged underscored the enormity of the bank run at SVB as it became the second-largest bank failure in American history.
Panicked customers attempted to withdraw a staggering $100 billion from Silicon Valley Bank on the day the tech lender was shut down by regulators, said Michael Barr, vice chair for supervision at the Federal Reserve.
Officials have previously detailed that customers successfully pulled $42 billion from Silicon Valley Bank on March 9, the day before it was shut.
Mismanagement led to SVB’s failure
Barr also detailed how SVB leadership failed to effectively manage interest rates and the risk of running out of cash, calling the bank’s failure is a “textbook case of mismanagement.”
“The bank waited too long to address its problems and, ironically, the overdue actions it finally took to strengthen its balance sheet sparked the uninsured depositor run that led to the bank’s failure,” said Barr, adding that there was “inadequate” risk management and internal controls.
Regulators say banks are safe
Barr echoed comments from other top regulators in assuring the public about the safety of banks.
“Our banking system is sound and resilient, with strong capital and liquidity,” he said Tuesday. “We are committed to ensuring that all deposits are safe. We will continue to closely monitor conditions in the banking system and are prepared to use all of our tools for any size institution, as needed, to keep the system safe and sound.”
More regulation is needed
“Executives at SVB and Signature [Bank] took wild risks and must be held accountable for exploding their banks,” said Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. “But let’s be clear, these collapses also represent a massive failure in supervision over our nation’s banks.”
All three federal regulators called to testify agreed with Warren that the government needs to strengthen the rules for banks to help prevent future bank collapses.
Bank executives could land in trouble
Both Gruenberg and Barr confirmed on Tuesday that they are considering serious action against the people who ran the banks.
Becker took home about $10 million in compensation last year. Joseph DePaolo, the former CEO of Signature Bank, received about $8.6 million.
Both the FDIC and Federal Reserve have the authority to claw some of that money back and further penalize bank executives. Potential consequences include prohibition from banking, civil money penalties, or the payment of restitution.
Martin Gruenberg, chairman of the board of directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, said his agency is already conducting investigations.