Day 5 of Trump New York hush money trial | CNN Politics

Live Updates

Trump criminal trial wraps for the day after opening statements and first witness

Former President Donald Trump looks on at Manhattan Criminal Court during his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments linked to extramarital affairs in New York on April 22, 2024.
CNN reporter describes what Trump was doing during opening statements
01:34 - Source: CNN

What you need to know

Our live coverage has concluded. Scroll through the posts below to read more about Trump’s trial in New York.

151 Posts

Key takeaways from opening statements and the first witness in Trump's hush money trial

Prosecutors and Trump’s attorneys delivered opening statements and the first witness — a former National Enquirer publisher — was called Monday in the historic and unprecedented criminal trial of a former president.

Each side got their first chance to lay out a theory of the case for jurors. Prosecutors told jurors that the reimbursement of hush money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels was part of a larger conspiracy to influence the 2016 presidential election.

The former president’s attorneys responded by telling the jury that Trump was innocent and not involved in the creation of the 34 business records he’s charged with falsifying. They also pointedly added that there’s “nothing wrong with trying to influence an election.”

Here are key takeaways from Monday:

  • Prosecutors say Trump schemed “to corrupt the 2016 presidential election”: The district attorney’s office framed the case for jurors as illegal payments to try to influence illicitly influence the 2016 election that Trump then tried to illegally cover up by falsifying business records. Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo walked the jury through Trump’s efforts, along with Michael Cohen and former American Media Inc., chief David Pecker, to keep damaging information from coming to light during the 2016 election.
  • Defense says Donald Trump is innocent: Defense attorney Todd Blanche began his opening statement with a simple assertion: “Donald Trump is innocent.” Blanche told the jury that the story isn’t as simple as prosecutors laid out and argued that Trump was not involved with any of the business records he’s accused of falsifying beyond signing the checks. Blanche didn’t dispute the paper trail existed, but he argued to the jury there was nothing illegal about signing non-disclosure agreements — or trying to influence an election.
  • Tabloid publisher testifies first: Prosecutors called former AMI CEO David Pecker as the first witness in their case against Trump. He testified for less than 30 minutes Monday morning before the trial adjourned for the day. He’s expected to continue testifying Tuesday. Colangelo teed up the former tabloid publisher as a key player in Trump’s “catch and kill” scheme to control the public narrative about him ahead of the 2016 election.
  • Gag order hearing will lead off court on Tuesday: Before the trial resumes Tuesday, Judge Juan Merchan is holding a hearing on allegations that Trump violated the judge’s gag order barring discussion of witnesses. The district attorney’s office asked the judge to fine Trump $1,000 for each of several gag order violations leading up to and since the trial started. In addition to the fines, prosecutors want the judge to remind Trump he could be imprisoned if he continues to disobey the order.
  • Trump was thinking about the $175 million bond hearing down the street: Meanwhile, other lawyers for Trump were in a courtroom a block away arguing over the legitimacy of the $175 million bond Trump posted to appeal the judgment in his civil fraud trial. Trump, who could not attend the civil hearing because he’s required to attend each day of the criminal trial, railed against Attorney General Letitia James.

Fact check: Trump falsely claims Michael Cohen’s crimes "had nothing to do with me"

Speaking to reporters Monday after opening statements in his criminal trial in Manhattan, former President Donald Trump declared that the crimes committed by his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen “had nothing to do with me.” 

Cohen is expected to be a key witness for the prosecution. Trump said: “The things he got in trouble for were things that had nothing to do with me. He got in trouble; he went to jail. This has nothing to do with me. This had to do with the taxicab company that he owned, which is just something he owned – and medallions and borrowing money and a lot of things – but it had nothing to do with me.” 

Facts First: Trump’s claim that Cohen’s prison sentence “had nothing to do with me” is false. Cohen’s three-year sentence in 2018 was for multiple crimes, some of which were directly related to Trump. Most notably, Cohen was sentenced for campaign finance offenses connected to a hush money scheme during the 2016 presidential campaign to conceal Trump’s alleged extramarital relationships – the same hush money scheme that is central to this prosecution against Trump. Cohen was also sentenced to two months in prison, to run concurrently with the three-year sentence, for lying to Congress in 2017 in relation to previous talks about the possibility of building a Trump Tower in Moscow, Russia, including about the extent of Trump’s involvement in the aborted Moscow initiative and about when in 2016 the discussions ended. (The discussions continued into June 2016, the month after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and did not conclude in January 2016 before the first votes were cast, as Cohen had claimed.)

Referring to Trump as “Individual-1,” Cohen said at the time of his 2018 guilty plea for making false statements to the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence: “I made these statements to be consistent with Individual-1’s political messaging and out of loyalty to Individual-1.” When Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to the campaign finance violations, he said he broke the law “in coordination and at the direction of a candidate for federal office,” Trump. 

David Pecker is an important witness in prosecutor's quest to prove criminal intent, legal analyst says

David Pecker will be back on the stand on Tuesday to continue testimony in the hush money trial against former President Donald Trump. Not only is he the first witness to answer questions from the prosecution, but he is also a critical piece of how the state is trying to prove criminal intent, one former federal prosecutor said.

Criminal intent means that “not just an act happened, but an act happened for a purpose,” said Elliot Williams, a CNN legal analyst. “The defendant did something wrong to carry out some criminal purpose.”

As the then-chairman of American Media Inc., which publishes the National Enquirer, Pecker was involved in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes he orchestrated on behalf of Trump, and he allegedly helped broker the deal with adult film star Stormy Daniels which is at the center of the case.

“It’s not just the catch-and-kill payments, but catch-and-kill payments for the purpose of concealing information from voters in the context of an election,” Williams explained, referring to the 2016 presidential election. 

Williams said it’s likely that prosecutors will focus much of their questioning trying to uncover what was discussed in meetings between Pecker and Trump.

The question at the heart of the argument, Williams said, is if the payments were intended to conceal information from voters, “or was it just Donald Trump saying, ‘Well, you know, this is embarrassing to my wife and my kids, I really want to keep this hidden.’”

Read about the stages of Trump's criminal trial — and what they mean 

Former President Donald Trump’s first criminal trial is expected to take six to eight weeks from start to finish.

This trial, related to a hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016, is the first of four ongoing criminal cases that are expected to head to trial for the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee.

Now that opening statements are done, prosecutors are presenting trial evidence through witness testimony and exhibits. David Pecker, the ex-publisher of the National Enquirer, will resume testimony Tuesday.

Defense attorneys can cross examine the prosecution’s witnesses and typically aim to discredit their testimony. Witnesses’ responses are considered evidence, but not the questions posed by an attorney.

Read more about the stages of the trial, and what they mean here.

Michael Cohen jabs back at Trump's claim that Cohen's crimes have nothing to do with him

Michael Cohen, who is expected to be a key witness in Donald Trump’s criminal trial, jabbed back at his former boss in response to comments Trump made about him outside the courtroom Monday.

Speaking to reporters in the courtroom hallway after court concluded, Trump said Cohen’s crimes have “nothing to do with me.”

“He got in trouble, he went to jail. This has nothing to do with me,” said Trump. “This had to do with the taxicab company that he owned, which is just something he owned — and medallions and borrowing money.”

Shortly after those comments. Cohen posted on social media, “Hey Von ShitzInPantz … your attacks of me stink of desperation. We are all hoping that you take the stand in your defense. 

Cohen, who is Trump’s former attorney, served time in federal prison after pleading guilty to breaking federal campaign laws when he facilitated the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, which is directly linked to the charges against Trump.  As for the taxi medallions that Trump referenced, Cohen was also sentenced for tax evasion related to a taxi medallion enterprise and lying to a bank in relation to a home loan. 

Trump is under a gag order and was ordered by Judge Juan Merchan not to comment about any witnesses in the trial.

CNN’s Daniel Dale contributed to this post.

See courtroom sketches from today's Trump trial

No cameras are allowed inside the Manhattan courtroom where Donald Trump’s hush money trial is underway, but a sketch artist captured the scene as opening statements unfolded and the first witness took the stand.

Biden builds early advertising edge as Trump spends millions on legal fees

President Joe Biden and his allies have nearly tripled Donald Trump’s network in ad spending over the last month and a half while the former president has had to devote millions of campaign funds to legal expenses — and sit in a New York courthouse for his hush money trial.

Since March 6, after Super Tuesday when Trump effectively secured the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, through April 21, Biden’s campaign and other Democratic advertisers spent $27.2 million on advertising for the presidential race, while the Trump campaign and GOP advertisers spent about $9.3 million, according to AdImpact data.

Ad spending data (presidential race, March 6 to April 21)

  • Democrats: $27,153,293
  • Republicans: $9,344,948

During that time, Biden’s campaign has spent millions in key battleground states, including $4.1 million in Michigan, $3.9 million in Pennsylvania, and at least $2 million in Arizona, Wisconsin, and Georgia. And the Biden network has used its plentiful airtime to promote the administration’s first-term record and slam Trump, focusing on key issues such as the cost of living and abortion rights.

Meanwhile, Trump’s network has failed to match that effort since he became the presumptive nominee, though a pro-Trump super PAC, MAGA Inc., recently ramped up its advertising, booking over $1 million worth of airtime in Pennsylvania to coincide with Biden’s recent campaign swing through the state last week.

Trump has also benefited over that stretch from a nearly $3 million anti-Biden campaign from outside groups aligned with the oil and gas industries, which have been running ads in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, criticizing California fuel standards defended by the Biden administration. But despite some recent signs of activity, Trump’s network has been significantly outspent on the airwaves since his general election matchup with Biden came into focus. And the latest round of FEC filings shows how Biden’s fundraising edge is enabling that advertising advantage, as Trump’s ongoing legal battles drain millions from his campaign coffers.  

How we got here: A timeline of the Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels hush money case

The first criminal trial of a US ex-president is underway in New York, where former President Donald Trump faces charges from the Manhattan District attorney related to a hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016. 

This is the first of four criminal cases expected to go to trial for Trump, also the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee. CNN compiled a timeline of the key events leading up to the historic trial. 

Here’s how we got here: 

  • September 2016: Donald Trump discusses a $150,000 hush money payment understood to be for former Playboy model Karen McDougal with Michael Cohen who secretly records the conversation. McDougal has alleged she had an extramarital affair with Trump beginning in 2006, which he has denied. 
  • October 7, 2016: The Washington Post releases an “Access Hollywood” video from 2005 in which Trump uses vulgar language to describe his sexual approach to women with then show host Billy Bush. 
  • October 27, 2016: According to prosecutors, Cohen pays Daniels $130,000 to her attorney through a shell company in exchange for her silence about an affair she allegedly had with Trump in 2006. This $130,000 sum is separate from the $150,000 paid to McDougal. Trump has publicly denied having any affairs and has denied making the payments. 
  • November 8, 2016: Trump secures the election to become the 45th president of the United States. 
  • February 2017: Prosecutors say Cohen meets with Trump in the Oval Office to confirm how he would be reimbursed for the hush money payment Cohen fronted to Daniels. Under the plan, Cohen would send a series of false invoices requesting payment for legal services he performed pursuant to a retainer agreement and receive monthly checks for $35,000 for a total of $420,000 to cover the payment, his taxes and a bonus, prosecutors alleged. Prosecutors also allege there was never a retainer agreement. 
  • January 2018: The Wall Street Journal breaks news about the hush money payment Cohen made to Daniels in 2016. 

See the full timeline. 

Trump is also facing charges in 3 other criminal cases

The hush money criminal trial against former President Donald Trump is just one of four criminal cases he faces while juggling his presidential campaign.

The former president is facing at least 88 charges over the four criminal indictments in Georgia, New York, Washington, DC, and Florida. Trump has pleaded not guilty to every charge in these cases. 

Here’s a recap of each case: 

  • Hush money: Trump was first indicted in March 2023 by the Manhattan district attorney on state charges related to a hush-money payment to an adult film star in 2016. Prosecutors allege Trump was part of an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election. Further, they allege he was part of an unlawful plan to suppress negative information, including the $130,000 payment. 
  • Classified documents: Trump was indicted in June 2023 by a federal grand jury in Miami for taking classified national defense documents from the White House after he left office and resisting the government’s attempts to retrieve the materials. The National Archives said in early 2022 that at least 15 boxes of White House records were recovered from the estate, including  some that were classified. The charges were brought by special counsel Jack Smith. 
  • Federal election interference: Smith separately charged the former president last August with four crimes over his efforts to reverse the 2020 election results. The indictment alleges Trump and a co-conspirator “attempted to exploit the violence and chaos at the Capitol by calling lawmakers to convince them … to delay the certification” of the election. That case is currently on hold as the Supreme Court weighs Trump’s claims of presidential immunity in the matter. 
  • Fulton County: State prosecutors in Georgia brought a similar election subversion case against Trump and others. An Atlanta-based grand jury on August 14, 2023, indicted Trump and 18 others on state charges stemming from their alleged efforts to overturn the former president’s 2020 electoral defeat. A trial date has not yet been set in that case. 

Read more about the four criminal cases Trump faces. 

What to know about the jurors in Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial

A full 12-person jury was seated last week for former President Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial, along with six alternate jurors.

Here’s what to know about the jurors who have been selected.

Opening statements will likely stick with jurors for the rest of the trial, attorney says

The opening statements in the hush money trial against former President Donald Trump will help shape the lens through which the jury views the rest of the testimony and evidence, one attorney said.

Alan Tuerkheimer, who is also a jury consultant, told CNN that jurors “will remember a lot” about opening statements, specifically the story each side was trying to tell.

“As time goes by, as the evidence comes in and there are more witnesses, the pre-formed ideas that jurors have from opening statements then are interpreted and assimilated in their minds as the trial progresses,” he told CNN on Monday.

Tuerkheimer said the defense likely wants jurors to put themselves in the shoes of Trump. In his opening statement, the former president’s attorney Todd Blanche tried to humanize Trump, saying, “He’s a man. He’s a husband. He’s a father.”

“You want to have facts, you want to have arguments, but also, jurors want a story. They want to know what really happened and what they’re supposed to look for as the witnesses continue on with the cases as they unfold,” Tuerkheimer said.

These are the charges against Trump in the hush money case

Donald Trump has faced three civil trials in New York since he left the White House, but this is the first time he faces possible jail time.

The former president is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, stemming from reimbursements made to his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen for hush money payments he made before the 2016 election to an adult film star alleging an affair with Trump. The former president has pleaded not guilty and denied the affair with Stormy Daniels.

Each count represents a separate instance of the alleged misconduct, pointing to different business records associated with a series of repayments to Cohen (ledger entries, checks, stubs, invoices, etc.) that were allegedly falsified to conceal his criminal conduct.

Penalty: The maximum penalty for each count is four years in state prison. However, the judge has discretion on how long any sentence should be and whether to allow any sentences to be served consecutively. He could also sentence Trump to probation.

New York caps sentencing for this type of felony at 20 years. A president has no authority to pardon state crimes.

What prosecutors can and can't ask Trump if he testifies

If Donald Trump decides to testify in his criminal hush money trial, these are the cases Judge Juan Merchan will allow prosecutors to use to cross examine Trump:

  • Merchan will allow Trump to be cross examined on the civil fraud verdict that found he violated the law by fraudulently inflating the value of his properties and was ordered to pay more than $464 million in penalties, including interest.
  • The judge will also allow prosecutors to ask Trump about the two violations of Judge Arthur Engoron’s gag order during the trial last fall, in which Trump was fined $15,000.
  • Prosecutors will be permitted to ask Trump about both E. Jean Carroll verdicts in federal court where juries found that Trump defamed her when he denied her rape allegations. Trump was ordered to pay $83.3 million for defaming Carroll.
  • And, Merchan is allowing prosecutors to elicit testimony from Trump about the settlement he reached with the New York attorney general that led to the dissolution of the Donald J. Trump Foundation.

This is what will not be allowed:

  • The judge is not allowing prosecutors to ask Trump about the ruling in Florida when the judge sanctioned Trump for filing a frivolous lawsuit against Hilary Clinton.
  • Merchan also ruled the 2022 Trump Organization tax fraud conviction is off limits for prosecutors if Trump testifies. As he issued his decision, Judge Merchan noted that the law gives a trial judge “wide range of discretion” in deciding what to allow to be used in cross-examination of a defendant.

Trump sat back in his chair and did not visibly react as the judge read his decision on Friday. 

The ruling arrived after the judge held a routine hearing – called a Sandoval hearing – on Friday to address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors could ask if he testifies. As a reminder, Trump told reporters outside the courtroom on Friday that he wants to testify.

Opening statements and the first witness: Catch up on what happened in court today

The first witness took the stand in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial on Monday after both sides laid out parts of their cases to the jury in opening statements.

Judge Juan Merchan delivered instructions to the jury, reminding them they “must decide this case on evidence” and that the “defendant is presumed to be innocent.”

During his testimony, David Pecker described his job at the time as the former chairman of the National Enquirer’s parent company. Pecker was involved in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes he orchestrated on behalf of Trump, and he allegedly helped broker the deal with adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Catch up on the key developments in court today:

Pecker’s testimony:

  • Pecker told the jury about his role at National Enquirer’s parent company and any big stories involving celebrities had to go through him. He said editors could spend up to $10,000 to investigate and publish a story, but anything more than that would have to be vetted and approved by him. 
  • Remember: Pecker has been granted immunity in exchange for his testimony and the parent company, American Media Inc., signed a non-prosecution agreement with prosecutors.

Prosecution’s opening statement:

  • Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo began his opening statement by focusing on the case, telling the jury it is “about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up.” He outlined a timeline, including when the hush money payments began and claimed that the payment was to “influence the presidential election.”
  • Colangelo also read some of Trump’s words from the “Access Hollywood” tape and said the Trump campaign went into “damage control mode” when it was released. The judge previously ruled the audio of the tape would not be allowed to be played as evidence, but prosecutors could use emails describing what happened. Trump sat back and did not look at the prosecutor during Colangelo’s opening statement.
  • Some context: The prosecution will have to rely on documents that prove intent in order to make their case to the jury and judge. They will need to prove things like an intent to defraud and the intent to commit another crime.

Defense’s opening statement:

  • Trump attorney Todd Blanche began his opening statement by saying, “President Trump is innocent” and that “none of this was a crime.” He told the jury they would find “plenty of reasonable doubt” in the prosecution’s presentation of the case. 
  • He acknowledged Stormy Daniels did sign an NDA in October 2016 in exchange for $130,000, but suggested that the payments to Cohen “were not a payback.” He also reiterated that entering into a non-disclosure agreement is “perfectly legal” and that Daniels’ affair allegations were an attempt to embarrass him.
  • Blanche also talked through some of the expected witnesses at the trial, especially Michael Cohen. Trump’s attorney argued Cohen’s “financial livelihood depends on President Trump’s destruction.” Trump adjusted his chair to turn and watch Blanche as he was talking.

What is happening tomorrow: There will be a hearing over whether Trump violated the gag order on Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. ET. The jury is set to return at 11 a.m. ET.

Trump's remarks outside the courtroom underscore judge's instructions to the jury, CNN analysts say

Judge Juan Merchan instructed the jury not to read about or research the hush money case against former President Donald Trump — and for good reason, according to CNN analysts.

After the court concluded on Monday, Trump made remarks to reporters in the hallway. He downplayed the indictment and attacked Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and his former lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen.

“He said Alvin Bragg, the DA, didn’t even want to bring this case. Not even clarifying if that’s true at all, but that will never become part of the proper evidence in that case,” Honig said, as an example.

CNN anchor and chief legal analyst Laura Coates also said Trump’s remarks outside the courtroom are looking to reframe the case in a way “that could be powerful to the court of public opinion,” not the actual jury. Trump is the prospective 2024 Republican nominee for president.

Merchan also said jurors must immediately notify the court of any attempts to influence any member of the jury.

“Remember, you have promised to be a fair juror,” the judge said in court earlier today.

Trump calls expenses in case legal and the trial a "very minor thing"

Former President Donald Trump downplayed the indictment in the hush money case during remarks after the court session’s first day ended.

Speaking outside the courtroom, Trump complained that the case is keeping him off the campaign trail.

“It’s very unfair what’s going on and I should be allowed to campaign,” he said. “We did nothing wrong.”

He also said he was indicted over bookkeeping which is a “very minor thing” compared to all the “violent crime going on outside.”

He claimed that the issue at hand is due to a “little line” in an invoice over a legal expense.

It could work in Trump's favor to testify in his own case, former assistant Manhattan DA says

Defense attorneys in criminal cases tend to steer their clients away from taking the witness stand since they could inadvertently be forced to share information that benefits the prosecution.

However, former President Donald Trump has already indicated he’d like to take the stand in his trial over alleged hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels. That might not be the worst idea, said Adam Kaufmann, a former executive assistant district attorney with the Manhattan DA’s office.

“He’s a compelling figure,” Kaufmann told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Monday. “He needs one person to believe in him to hang the jury and he might be able to do that [by] testifying himself.” Meanwhile, as Kaufmann pointed out, the prosecution has to convince all jurors that Trump is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to win the case.

Court has wrapped up for the day 

The court has adjourned for the day.

There will be a hearing tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. ET over whether Donald Trump violated the gag order. The jury will return at 11 a.m. ET.

Trump's team learned about David Pecker's testimony on Sunday afternoon, attorney says

Trump’s team learned David Pecker was the first witness at 3 p.m. ET on Sunday, the former president’s attorney Emil Bove said.

Bove said they would’ve brought up the records issue sooner had they known Pecker was first up in the witness order.

Some background: Prosecutors initially refused to give Trump’s team a witness lineup, saying they don’t trust Trump won’t post on social media or attack them publicly.

On Friday, Joshua Steinglass acquiesced and said that they’d inform Trump’s team of the first witness with brief notice, so Trump wouldn’t have ample time to attack the witnesses on social media.

Judge asks lawyers if they have anything else to submit ahead of gag order hearing

The judge asks both sides if there’s anything more they like to submit ahead of tomorrow’s hearing on the gag order.

Donald Trump attorney Emil Bove said no, but prosecutor Chris Conroy asked if they could approach the bench.

David Pecker took the stand briefly as the first witness. Here's a recap of what he said

The first witness took the stand in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial on Monday after both sides laid out parts of their cases to the jury in opening statements.

During his testimony, David Pecker described his job at the time as the former chairman of the National Enquirer’s parent company.

Here’s a recap of what he said:

  • Pecker told the jury about his role at National Enquirer’s parent company and said that any big stories involving celebrities had to go through him.
  • He said editors could spend up to $10,000 to investigate and publish a story, but anything more than that would have to be vetted and approved by him. 
  • Pecker also testified that he had a private email for things he didn’t want his assistant to see.
  • Remember: Pecker has been granted immunity in exchange for his testimony and the parent company, American Media Inc., signed a non-prosecution agreement with prosecutors.
  • During opening statements, prosecutor Matthew Colangelo focused on the case, telling the jury it is “about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up.”
  • During his turn, Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche told the jury, “President Trump is innocent” and that “none of this was a crime.” He said they will find “plenty of reasonable doubt” in the prosecution’s case. 

The judge has excused the jury until 11 a.m. ET tomorrow.

Trump whispers to one of his lawyers as another discusses records with judge

Lawyers in the courtroom now discussing evidence related to newspaper articles and business records from AMI, the National Enquirer’s parent company.

As Donald Trump attorney Emil Bove is discussing the records with the judge, Trump and another one of his attorneys, Todd Blanche, are whispering to each other.

Trump attorney addresses upcoming issues with Pecker's testimony with judge

While speaking with Judge Juan Merchan, Donald Trump’s attorney Emil Bove addressed a few issues that they expect to come up with David Pecker’s testimony.

Bove asked for limiting instructions to the jury about American Media Inc., the parent company of the National Enquirer, and its non-prosecution agreement, similar to Michael Cohen’s.

Bove said it needs to be modified slightly and Merchan asked to submit a proposal this afternoon.

Trump's lawyers are objecting to Pecker's testimony about whereabouts of Dylan Howard

Donald Trump’s lawyers are objecting to David Pecker’s testimony about the whereabouts of Dylan Howard, who was editor in chief of the National Enquirer.

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said it’s appropriate to elicit the hearsay testimony about Howard to tee up why he won’t be available to testify at trial.

Earlier, Pecker said he and Howard are no longer in contact. Pecker said it’s his understanding that Howard is living in Australia and has a “spinal condition” that prohibits him from traveling internationally.

Judge Juan Merchan noted the objection but didn’t rule otherwise.

The attorneys and judge are still in the courtroom

The defense team and prosecutors are still in the courtroom following Judge Juan Merchan dismissing the jury for the day.

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass was asked to approach the bench over scheduling.

Trump is sitting alone at the table watching them.

David Pecker smiles and says "Hi" to Trump's table

David Pecker is stepping down from the witness stand. He smiled and said “Hi” to Trump’s table as he walked past.

Judge excuses jury and tells them to be back at 11 a.m. ET tomorrow

The judge is excusing the jury.

He told them to return at 11 a.m. ET and said court will go until 2 p.m. tomorrow.

The hearing over whether Donald Trump violated the gag order is set for 9:30 a.m. ET tomorrow.

David Pecker describes relationship with former editor in chief of National Enquirer

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass is asking David Pecker about Dylan Howard, who was editor in chief of the National Enquirer.

“Dylan reported directly to me,” Pecker said.

When asked, Pecker confirmed that Howard ran the network of sources for AMI. His job was to maintain and cultivate relationships with potential sources, he said.

When it came to “juicy stories,” Steinglass asked, did Howard run those decisions by you?

“Yes he did,” Pecker said.

Pecker said he and Howard are no longer in contact. Pecker said it’s his understanding that Howard is living in Australia and has a “spinal condition” that prohibits him from traveling internationally.

Trump is expressionless as he looks at David Pecker

Donald Trump is looking directly at David Pecker as he testifies. His face is expressionless.

Pecker says he had private email for things he didn't want his assistant to see

David Pecker said he had two email addresses, one for general work and another private one for emails, “I didn’t want my assistant to see.”

Earlier, he laughed a few times on the stand when he was asked to give last four digits of multiple phone numbers. He confused one but then was proud that he remembered another

“This isn’t a quiz,” Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass joked, drawing a loud laugh from Pecker.

Trump attorney Todd Blanche laughed at the routine. Trump is sitting forward facing Pecker, seemingly watching him closely as he testifies.

David Pecker says he had the final say on big celebrity stories

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass asked if David Pecker had final say on “big stories” involving celebrities.

“Yes I did,” he said.

Pecker also walked through “editor meetings” for the jury and explained how they would look at the cover of magazines.

Pecker says tabloids used checkbook journalism

David Pecker, the ex-publisher of the National Enquirer, said he had “the final say on the celebrity side of the magazines.”

“We used checkbook journalism,” he added, describing how the tabloids paid for stories.

Pecker testifies that editors could spend up to $10,000 to investigate and publish a story, but anything more than that would have to be vetted and approved by him. 

Pecker describes his role at National Enquirer's parent company, AMI

Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass is having David Pecker, the then-chairman and CEO of American Media Inc. walk through his role and what kinds of publications are produced by the company.

Pecker is looking at the prosecutors and toward the jury as he answers questions.

Trump looks at David Pecker as he testifies

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass is now walking through David Pecker’s background, including that he’s married, his educational background and his work as a consultant.

Donald Trump is looking at Pecker as he testifies.

More than half the jury asks for writing materials

More than half the jurors raised their hands when Judge Juan Merchan asked if they wanted writing materials.

Jurors are allowed to take notes during the trial.

Pecker doesn't look at Trump as he enters the courtroom

David Pecker entered the courtroom from a side door. He walked behind Donald Trump’s chair but didn’t look at him as he walked slowly to the witness box.

Trump attorney Todd Blanche whispered to Trump after Pecker was called.

Key things to know about David Pecker, ex-publisher of the National Enquirer

As the then-chairman of American Media Inc., which publishes the National Enquirer, David Pecker was involved in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes he orchestrated on behalf of Trump, and he allegedly helped broker the deal with adult film start Stormy Daniels.

According to court documents, an agent for Daniels contacted AMI in October 2016 and said she was willing to go public with her allegations of an affair with Trump. Pecker then allegedly contacted Cohen, who subsequently negotiated the deal, per court filings from Cohen’s plea agreement.

In a separate incident, AMI agreed to pay model and actress Karen McDougal $150,000 months before the 2016 election for her silence about an alleged affair with Trump. While this payment is not part of the charges against the former president, prosecutors are expected to use it to establish a pattern of such payments.

Pecker has been granted immunity in exchange for his testimony and AMI signed a non-prosecution agreement with prosecutors.

Read up on the other key players in the case.

Prosecution calls David Pecker as first witness

“The People call David Pecker,” prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said.

The jury is entering

Jurors are entering the courtroom right now.

How is Melania Trump holding up?

Former First Lady Melania Trump hasn’t accompanied her husband at his trial over alleged hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels because of an alleged affair Trump had with Daniels while Melania was already married to former President Donald Trump.

That said, she’s “completely upbeat” and “unfazed,” David Urban, a Republican strategist who saw the former first lady at a campaign event held in Mar-a-Lago over the weekend, told CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Monday.

He didn’t discuss the case directly with Melania but she probably feels it’s “outrageous,” said Urban, who previously advised the former president.

Trump is back in the courtroom

Donald Trump is back in the courtroom. He walked to his seat at the defense table.

Judge is back on the bench

Judge Juan Merchan is back on the bench after a short break.

Trump looks at reporters as he exits the courtroom

Donald Trump is leaving the courtroom following opening statements. He’s looking at the reporters in the rows as he exits.

Trump did not make any statements in the hallway.

The court is in a short recess

The court is in a short 10-minute recess.

"You will put aside whatever views you have of President Trump," Blanche tells jury as opening statement ends

“You told all of us, you told the court, you told me, you will put aside whatever views you have of President Trump,” Defense lawyer Todd Blanche told the jury as he wrapped up his opening statement.

Trump attorney to jury: "Use your common sense"

Donald Trump attorney Todd Blanche told jurors to use common sense when assessing the case.

“Use your common sense. We’re New Yorkers. It’s why we’re here,” Blanche said, adding “we trust you” to decide the case on the evidence.

“If you do that, there will be a very swift not guilty verdict.”

Who are Trump's lawyers?

Trump’s legal team is led by Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, two former federal prosecutors from New York, and Susan Necheles, a veteran criminal defense lawyer with deep experience in New York and before Merchan.

Necheles represented Trump’s business at its tax fraud trial in 2022. The company was convicted. 

According to his website, Blanche has worked as a prosecutor and defense attorney at two large law firms.

He says during his career as a defense attorney, he got the criminal indictment against Trump’s 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort dismissed prior to trial and achieved an “unexpectedly positive result in the politically charged prosecution by the SDNY against Igor Fruman, an associate of Rudy Giuliani.”

Fruman was sentenced to one year and one day in prison for his role in a scheme to funnel Russian money into US elecitons.

Bove was the co-chief of the national security unit at the US attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York.

Kendra Wharton, a white-collar defense lawyer who has experience practicing in Washington, DC, will also help the former president’s legal team with its defense.

In a statement to CNN in September 2023, Blanche said that Bove is “an expert in white collar and CIPA-related litigation” and Wharton is a “brilliant lawyer and clients have trusted her for years.”

Trump attorney Todd Blanche is now talking about David Pecker

Trump attorney Todd Blanche is now talking about David Pecker, the former chairman of the National Enquirer’s parent company.

“It’s not a scheme, unless a scheme means something that doesn’t matter, that’s not illegal,” Blanche said of the “catch-and-kill” agreement with Pecker.

Blanche urged the jury to listen to Pecker’s testimony over the next couple of days.

He encouraged the jurors to listen to Pecker’s motivation to sell magazines when he testifies.

Trump attorney criticizes Stormy Daniels: "Leading up to the 2016 election she saw her chance"

Defense attorney Todd Blanche said adult film star Stormy Daniels has “made a life” off of her communications, even though she publicly denied an affair in writing.

Blanche added that “leading up to the 2016 election she saw her chance.”

Trump’s attorney told the jury that Daniels owes Donald Trump about $600,000 as a result of her failed legal attempts against Trump.

“She also wrote a book. She was paid for a documentary,” Blanche says of Daniels, noting that the courts sided with Trump in legal disputes between the two.

Blanche went on to say that Daniels “has no idea” about the business records at issue in this case and how they were created. “Her testimony, while salacious, does not matter,” he says.

He added that she had no idea what was written on the invoices, how the payments were booked, or about the checks.

Trump attorney says Cohen's "financial livelihood depends on President Trump’s destruction"

Donald Trump attorney Todd Blanche told the jury they cannot make a serious decision about Trump based on Michael Cohen’s testimony.

Cohen has written several books and frequently appears in media, Blanche said. “His entire financial livelihood depends on President Trump’s destruction,” he added.

“You cannot make a serious decision about President Trump relying on the words of Michael Cohen,” Blanche said.

DA's office objects to 2 statements about Cohen lying

The Manhattan district attorney’s office objected to two statements about Michael Cohen lying, which Judge Juan Merchan sustained.

He asked lawyers to approach the bench.

Blanche accused Cohen of perjuring himself at Trump’s civil fraud trial last fall.

The objection was sustained. Blanche continues.

Trump attorney says Cohen is "obsessed" with former president

Michael Cohen is “obsessed with President Trump, even to this day,” attorney Todd Blanche told jurors, noting Cohen’s podcast and other public commentary.

“He has a goal, an obsession with getting President Trump,” Blanche said.

“I submit to you that he cannot be trusted.”

Trump attorney says they'll cross examine some witnesses more than others

Defense attorney Todd Blanche said his team will cross examine some witnesses called by the prosecution a lot and some very little.

One witness the jury will hear a lot about is Michael Cohen, he said.

Blanche said Cohen wanted a job in the administration after the 2016 election but didn’t get one.

Meanwhile, bond terms tweaked but $175 million amount remains the same in civil fraud case

Attorneys for former President Donald Trump and the New York attorney general’s office reached an agreement Monday on the terms of the $175 million bond that Trump posted to cover the civil fraud judgment he’s appealing.

The agreement comes after the state attorney general challenged the bond, questioning the financial ability of the underwriter, Knight Specialty Insurance Company, to guarantee it.

Under the terms of the agreement, Trump is required to keep the $175 million in the Charles Schwab account used to secure the bond as cash. Knight Specialty must have exclusive control of the account and may not withdraw or trade any of the funds in it. The company must also provide a monthly statement to the attorney general with the account’s balance. None of the agreements for securing the bond can be amended without the court’s approval, and Knight Specialty must submit to the jurisdiction of the court.

In January, Judge Arthur Engoron fined Trump and his co-defendants, including his adult sons and his company, $464 million, finding they fraudulently inflated the value of the former president’s assets to obtain better loan rates.

Trump has posted the $175 million bond as he appeals the ruling.

Judge sustains objection on Blanche's comment regarding lawyers negotiated NDA and payments

After Trump attorney Todd Blanche said lawyers negotiated the NDA and payments, Judge Juan Merchan called the lawyers to the bench.

The DA’s office had objected, and Merchan sustained it when Blanche said that Stormy Daniels’ allegations were almost an attempt “to extort President Trump.”

“There is nothing illegal about entering into a nondisclosure agreement period,” Blanche continued back from the bench.

Merchan sustained the objection on Blanche’s comment on lawyers and the Trump attorney continued.

Trump’s lawyer seeks to humanize him while discrediting prosecution’s case

In his opening statement on Monday, Trump attorney Todd Blanche tried towing a delicate line: acknowledging his client was once the most powerful person in the country while also trying to humanize him to the jury of 12 regular New Yorkers.

Blanche noted that Trump’s defense team would refer to their client as “President Trump” out of respect. He earned that title, Blanche said, “because he was our 45th president.”

But he added: “He’s a man. He’s a husband. He’s a father. He’s a person just like you and just like me.”

Blanche told the jury that they would find “plenty of reasonable doubt” enabling them to acquit his client.

“The 34 counts, ladies and gentlemen, are really just pieces of paper,” Blanche said. “None of this was a crime.”

He acknowledged Stormy Daniels did in fact sign a non-disclosure agreement in October 2016 — just before the 2016 election — in exchange for $130,000. But he said entering into an NDA is “perfectly legal.”

He suggested the payments to Cohen “were not a payback,” noting the lawyer was paid $420,000 - much more than the hush money for which prosecutors allege he was reimbursed.

Daniels' claim she had an affair with Trump was an attempt to embarrass him, defense says

Donald Trump attorney Todd Blanche said Stormy Daniels’ false allegations that she had an affair with Trump was “sinister.”

“It was an attempt to embarrass President Trump, to embarrass his family,” Blanche said in his opening statement.

"Entering into a non-disclosure agreement is perfectly legal," Trump attorney says

Defense attorney Todd Blanche said non-disclosure agreements are “perfectly legal” following him acknowledging that adult film star Stormy Daniels did sign a non-disclosure agreement in October 2016 in exchange for $130,000.

“Entering into a non-disclosure agreement is perfectly legal,” Blanche said. “You will learn that companies do that all the time with some regularity.”

Trump fought back as he always does, Blanche added.

Trump attorney: "There’s nothing wrong with trying to influence an election. It's called democracy"

“I have a spoiler alert: There’s nothing wrong with trying to influence an election. It’s called democracy,” Donald Trump attorney Todd Blanche said of accusations the payments were trying to illicitly influence the 2016 election.

Trump accountant expected to testify during trial, defense attorney says

Defense attorney Todd Blanche said he expects a Trump accountant to testify at trial.

He said the prosecutors won’t suggest that the Trump Organization accounting department employee who filed the Michael Cohen payment records on Trump’s ledgers did anything wrong when she entered the ledger records or cut the checks.

“You’ll learn that President Trump had nothing to do with any of the 34 pieces of paper … except he signed the checks,” Blanche told jurors.

“The reality is Mr Trump is not on the hook — is not criminally responsible for something Mr. Cohen may have done years after the fact,” he said.

The employee “isn’t going to say she had any conversations with President Trump, ‘Hey, how should I book this?’ You won’t hear any of that. Her boss, he’s not going to say he talked to President Trump about it.”

Defense attorney asks: "Would a frugal business man" pay $420,000 for a $130,000 debt?

Donald Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche asked the jury: “Ask yourself: would a frugal business man who pinches pennies repay a $130,000 debt to the tune of $420,000?”

"None of this was a crime," Trump attorney tells jury as he walks through checks Cohen received

Defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now walking through the checks that were cut for Michael Cohen in 2017 after he became Donald Trump’s personal attorney.

“The 34 counts, ladies and gentlemen, are really just pieces of paper,” Blanche said.

“None of this was a crime,” he added.

Blanche acknowledged adult film start Stormy Daniels did in fact sign an NDA in October 2016 in exchange for $130,000.

Blanche suggests that the payments to Cohen “were not a payback.”

The heart of the case: Trump was charged by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office last year with 34 counts of falsifying business records. The charges stem from reimbursements made to Cohen for hush money payments he made before the 2016 election to Daniels. The former president has pleaded not guilty and denied the affair. 

Each criminal charge Trump is facing relates to a specific entry among the business records of the Trump Organization, according to the indictment. Prosecutors accuse Trump of repeatedly causing false entries in the business records. 

If prosecutors fall short of proving their case laid out to jury, that's reasonable doubt, legal analyst says

In their opening statement, prosecutors laid out how they are going to prove their case against Donald Trump in the hush money trial, a challenging feat they will need to get right, CNN chief legal analyst Laura Coates said.

“Although they are laying out this case quite methodically, remember the jurors are going to be taking notes, they now have expectations,” Coates said. She noted that the jurors will now expect to see all the evidence laid out to them like handwritten accounting from Allen Weisselberg and receipts from Michael Cohen.

“They now have to match-up what they introduced as admissible evidence to what this jury will do,” Coates said, and at the end the prosecution will have to close their arguments by reiterating that they did in fact lay out the evidence as they said they would in their opening statement.

“If they fall short, that’s reasonable doubt,” Coates said.

Trump attorney says jury will find "plenty of reasonable doubt" in prosecution's presentation of case

Donald Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche said that prosecutors just told what appears “to be a very clean, nice story,” but that “it is not simple, as the people just described.”

Blanche said that what prosecutor Matthew Colangelo just told the jury is not true, and the jury will find “plenty of reasonable doubt.”

Trump will be called "President Trump, out of respect," defense attorney says

Defense attorney Todd Blanche said that his team will call Trump “President Trump” out of respect, a title he “has earned because he was our 45th president.”

He adds, “He’s a man. He’s a husband. He’s a father. He’s a person just like you and just like me.”

Trump is "larger than life," defense attorney says

Defense attorney Todd Blanche described his client as “larger than life” but noted he’s in court to defense himself.

“You have seen him for years and years and years,” Blanche said. “He is in some ways larger than life.”

“But he’s also here in this courtroom, doing what any of us would do, defending himself,” Blanche said.

Trump is watching his attorney give opening statement

Former President Donald Trump adjusted in his chair to turn to watch his attorney Todd Blanche give his opening statement.

Defense begins opening statement: "President Trump did not commit any crimes"

Donald Trump attorney Todd Blanche began his opening statement by saying, “President Trump is innocent. President Trump did not commit any crimes.”

Prosecutor has wrapped up his opening statement

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo has wrapped up his opening statement. Trump attorney Todd Blanche is now up.

Prosecutor to jury: "We are confident you will have no reasonable doubt that Donald Trump is guilty"

“At the end of the case,” Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo tells the jury, “we are confident you will have no reasonable doubt that Donald Trump is guilty of falsifying business records with the intent to conceal an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of a presidential election.”

Colangelo said the allegations will be backed up by testimony from from witnesses like David Pecker and Keith Davidson, and an extensive paper trail including bank records, emails, text message, phone logs and business records.

Trump is writing and passing notes to lawyers as prosecutor outlines his alleged role in hush money payments

Donald Trump is still sitting back in his chair and not reacting to most of what Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo is saying.

He is writing a lot and passing notes to his lawyers.

"You'll need to keep an open mind," prosecutor tells jury regarding Michael Cohen's testimony

Assistant District Attorney Matthew Colangelo tells the jury in former President Donald Trump’s first criminal trial that they will need to keep an open mind when assessing Michael Cohen’s testimony.

“You’ll need to keep an open mind and carefully evaluate all of the evidence that corroborates Michael Cohen’s testimony,” Colangelo said.

“Cohen’s testimony will be backed up,” by testimony from other witnesses and an extensive paper trail, including bank records, phone logs, business documents and other records,” he added.

Michael Cohen's name will come up a lot during the trial, prosecutor tells jury

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo acknowledged the jury will hear that Michael Cohen, like other witnesses who will testify at trial, “has made mistakes in his past.”

“During this trial, you will hear a lot about Michael Cohen,” he said.

“I suspect the defense will go to great lengths to get you to reject his testimony, precisely because it is so damning,” Colangelo said.

Jurors will hear about Cohen’s criminal conviction for campaign finance violations, tax crimes and lying to Congress, Colangelo told jurors during his opening statement.

The jury will also see that Cohen is “publicly committed to making sure the defendant is held accountable for his role in this conspiracy.”

Judge closely watching prosecutor giving opening statement

As prosecutor Matthew Colangelo gives his opening statement, Judge Juan Merchan is closely watching him.

Trump intended "nobody learn about the Stormy Daniels payoff," prosecutor says

Through the payments, Donald Trump “intended that nobody learn about the Stormy Daniels payoff,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said.

Prosecutor says Trump doubled price of Stormy Daniels deal to "disguise it as income"

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said that when it came time for Donald Trump to pay Michael Cohen back for the “catch and kill deal” involving Stormy Daniels, “you’ll see he didn’t negotiate the price down. He doubled it. And he doubled it so they could disguise it as income.”

Colangelo noted that Trump, Cohen and Allen Weisselberg agreed that Cohen would be paid back in monthly installments by sending fake invoices to the Trump Org each month.

It was a “clever way to pay Cohen back without being too obvious about it,” the prosecutor told the jury.

The repayment to Cohen, as recorded in the business records, was “a double lie” because there was no retainer agreement and Cohen was not getting paid for legal services in 2017.

Here are key things to know about Cohen, and his role in the case:

Prosecutor walks jurors through $130,000 payment

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo is walking the jury through the $130,000 payment Trump made to Michael Cohen, and how they reached that number by including funds for taxes because the money was being listed as income and not as a reimbursement.

He notes former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg wrote down all of these figures in the Cohen repayment.

Jurors will see in Weisselberg’s handwriting how they calculated Cohen’s reimbursement payments. Weisselberg’s notes show that it was “a grossed up way to disguise” the payment, Colaneglo said.

Colangelo said jurors will see, “Donald Trump was a very frugal business man who believed in pinching pennies.”

Prosecutors seek to reframe their case against Trump: It’s not just about hush money, “it was election fraud, pure and simple.”

In his opening statement on Monday, prosecutor Matthew Colangelo sought to reframe the case against Donald Trump - saying it was about much more than the hush money he allegedly paid to cover up negative information about him.

Instead, Colangelo said, Trump, along with his attorney Michael Cohen and David Pecker, the former chairman of the National Enquirer’s parent company AMI, “formed a conspiracy … to influence the presidential election.”

“The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election,” the prosecutor said. “Then he covered up that criminal conspiracy by lying in his New York business records over and over and over again.”

“It was election fraud, pure and simple,” Colangelo told the jury.

The scheme was three-pronged, Colangelo said: the trio sought to help Trump kill negative stories about Trump - a process known as “catch-and-kill” - publish favorable stories about Trump and publish negative stories about Trump’s political opponents.

He laid out three different instances where the trio allegedly conspired to prevent harmful information about Trump from becoming public prior to the 2016 election.

The first, prosecutors said, was a $30,000 payment to a former Trump Tower doorman who alleged Trump fathered a child - an allegation that ended up not being true: “It was the first time that David Pecker had ever paid anyone for information about Donald Trump,” Colangelo said.

Pecker, the prosecutor said, was “not acting as a publisher. He was acting as a co-conspirator.” Even after the allegation was determined to be false, Cohen instructed the Enquirer’s parent company not to release the doorman from a non-disclosure agreement until after the presidential election.

The second catch-and-kill deal involved Karen McDougal, who alleged she had an affair with Trump. Trump, Colangelo said, “desperately did not want this information about Karen McDougal to become public because he was concerned about the election.” AMI paid McDougal $150,000 for the rights to her story, the prosecutor said.

“The real reason Pecker directed AMI to make this payment to McDougal was to make sure she didn’t publicize” her account of her affair with Trump before the 2016 election, Colangelo says.

The third alleged instance involved the much-publicized payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who said she also had an affair with Trump. Trump has denied both affairs with McDougal and Daniels.

“Another story about sexual infidelity, especially with a porn star, on the heels of the Access Hollywood tape would have been devastating to his campaign,” Colangelo told the jury. “So at Trump’s direction, Cohen negotiated the deal to buy Daniels’ story,” and prevent it from becoming public before the election.

Prosecutor: Lawyer for Stormy Daniels texted National Enquirer editor "what have we done?" on election night

Prosecutor Matthew Colaneglo described how on Election Night in 2016, as news outlets got closer to announcing Donald Trump as president, the lawyer who cut deals for Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels, Keith Davidson, texted National Enquirer editor-in-chief Dylan Howard: “What have we done?”

Prosecutor cites Stormy Daniels affair allegations following the release of "Access Hollywood" tape

Prosecutor Matthew Colaneglo said after the “Access Hollywood” tape surfaced an adult film star alleged she had an extramarital affair with Donald Trump.

“That woman was an adult film actress, a porn star named Stormy Daniels,” he says.

“(Michael) Cohen then discussed the situation with Trump who was adamant he did not want the story to come out. Another story about sexual infidelity especially with a porn star on the heels of the Access Hollywood tape would have been devastating to his campaign. So at Trump’s direction Cohen negotiated the deal to buy Daniel’s story” to prevent it from becoming public before the election.

David Pecker, then-chairman and CEO of American Media Inc., was never paid back for the doorman or the model and actress Karen McDougal deals but he was willing to help as long as someone else put up the money.

Cohen’s hope was to delay payment to Daniels until after the election and then not pay at all. But Daniels and her lawyer realized they were being strung along, Colangelo said.

At Trump's request Cohen agreed to use his own money to "keep Stormy Daniels quiet," prosecutor says

Donald Trump didn’t want to write a check himself to make the $130,000 payment, so he asked Michel Cohen and Allen Weisselberg to “figure out some other way” to make the payment, prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said in his opening statement.

“Before putting up his own money Cohen confirmed with Trump that Trump would pay him back,” Colangelo said.

At Trump’s request, Colangelo noted, Cohen agreed to use out his own money to “keep Stormy Daniels quiet” two weeks before the 2016 election.

Trump campaign went into "damage control mode" after tape release, prosecutor says

Donald Trump’s campaign went into “damage control mode” following the release of the “Access Hollywood” tape and initially described it as “locker room talk,” Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo explained.

Colangelo said Trump’s campaign insiders were concerned Trump’s words were caught on video.

Trump passes note and whispers to attorneys

As prosecutor Matthew Colangelo talks about the “Access Hollywood” tape” in his opening statement, Trump passed a note to his attorney Emil Bove.

Trump also whispered to his attorney Todd Blanche.

Prosecutor reads Trump's words from "Access Hollywood" tape to jury

Warning: This post contains graphic content.

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo read Donald Trump’s words to the jury from the “Access Hollywood” tape.

“I just start kissing them… .It’s like a magnet… I don’t even wait….When you’re a star they let you do it…. Grab them by the pussy,” he read.

“Those are Donald Trump’s words,” Colangelo said. As the words were read, Trump did not seem to be paying attention or reacting at all.

Colangelo said “the impact on the campaign was immediate and explosive.”

Report on "Access Hollywood" tape turned the 2016 campaign upside down, prosecutor says

Assistant District Attorney Matthew Colangelo says that the Washington Post’s October 2016 report on the “Access Hollywood” tape “turned the rest of the presidential campaign entirely upside down.”

Colangelo begins introducing the Stormy Daniels’ story starting with the Post’s report. Prosecutors have argued the campaign’s reaction to the “Access Hollywood” tape was one reason they were so concerned about Daniels’ allegation.

Prosecutor says jury will hear recorded call between Trump and Cohen about McDougal payment during trial

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo told the jury that AMI paid Karen McDougal $150,000 for the rights to her story.

Colangelo said the evidence will show that Donald Trump was informed about the McDougal situation, and that “the defendant desperately did not want this information about Karen McDougal to become public because he was concerned about the election.”

Colangelo said David Pecker started “getting antsy and frustrated” because he was concerned Trump wouldn’t pay him back for the McDougal pay off.

To show good faith with Pecker, Michael Cohen used his cell phone to record a conversation with Trump about the McDougal payment in September of 2016.

The jury will hear that recorded call at trial, Colangelo says.

“Just as Cohen was doing, Pecker also used a middleman to hide the true nature of the transaction,” Colangelo said.

The prosecutor said that Pecker eventually told Cohen that the “deal was off” and that AMI would “eat the cost” of paying McDougal.

David Pecker was not acting as a publisher, but as a "co-conspirator," prosecutor says

Assistant District Attorney Matthew Colangelo says that David Pecker, the former chairman of the National Enquirer’s parent company, was “not acting as a publisher, he was acting as a co-conspirator.”

Colangelo is laying out stories associated with the then-chairman and CEO of American Media Inc., Pecker, who is accused of being involved in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes orchestrated on Trump’s behalf.

Pecker was a central player in the alleged scheme to pay hush money to adult-film star Stormy Daniels to cover up her alleged affair with Trump ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Prosecutor tells jury there were 3 different "catch and kill" transactions for Trump

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo raised the stories the National Enquirer ran to attack Donald Trump’s political opponents, including accusing Ben Carson of medical malpractice and accusing GOP Sen. Ted Cruz of “sexual infidelity,” and of “having some family connection to the JFK assassination.”

“They used a practice called catch and kill,” he told the jury.

“It’s a way of buying damaging information not to publish it, but to hide it, make it go away, and in this case, help the candidate,” Colangelo said.

The first one was the $30,000 payment to the former doorman of Trump Tower who alleged Trump fathered a child. “It was the first time that David Pecker had every paid anyone for information about Donald Trump,” he told the jury

Colangelo then described the second catch and kill deal, involving Karen McDougal.

Colangelo said the evidence will show that Trump was informed about the McDougal situation, and “the defendant desperately did not want this information about Karen McDougal to become public because he was concerned about the election.”

Here's what prosecutors have to prove to make their case in the hush money trial

The prosecution in the hush money trial against Donald Trump will have to rely on documents that prove intent in order to make their case to the jury and judge.

“There are 34 business records counts,” CNN’s chief legal analyst Laura Coates noted.

Coates went through an argument checklist on what prosecutors will be aiming to prove:

  • Intent to defraud
  • Intent to commit another crime
  • Aid to conceal the commission of that crime
  • Made and caused a false entry in the business records — which Coates notes is a key argument because that’s the idea that says that this was an illegal retainer, “in fact a non-existent one.”
  • Documents/evidence needed to show falsified records

And then the motive will need to be determined on whether this was a private or political act: Whether this was done to protect and prevent Trump’s wife, Melania Trump, from finding out about the affair or done for political purposes.

“Even if it was half private, half political, it doesn’t matter,” Coates said.

Prosecutor says Trump, Cohen and National Enquirer publisher agreed to "help the defendant's campaign"

In a 2015 meeting, Donald Trump, Michael Cohen and David Pecker, the ex-publisher of the National Enquirer, agreed that Pecker “would help the defendant’s campaign,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo says in his opening statement.

The scheme was three-pronged. Colangelo said: Pecker agreed to help Trump kill negative stories on Trump, publish favorable stories about Trump and publish negative stories about Trump’s political opponents.

They agreed that AMI, the parent company of the National Enquirer, would use the magazine to prevent harmful information from becoming public and publish flattering stories about Trump, Colangelo said. Silencing the harmful stories was the “core” of the conspiracy,” he said.

Prosecutor walks jurors through what evidence they will see

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo noted that the indictment is not evidence.

He is now walking jurors through what evidence they will see.

Trump just passed his attorney a note

Trump passed his attorney Todd Blanche a note as prosecutor Matthew Colangelo delivered his opening statement.

Prosecutor: Payment was to "influence the presidential election"

Assistant district attorney Matthew Colangelo says Michael Cohen made the hush money payment “at the defendant’s direction and he did it to influence the presidential election.”

After the election, Donald Trump reimbursed Cohen for that payment, and they “disguised what the payments were for,” the prosecutor added in his opening statement.

Trump “said in business records that he was paying Cohen for legal services pursuant to a retainer agreement. But those were lies. There was no retainer agreement,” Colangelo said.

Jurors are watching the prosecutor as he delivers his opening statement

The jurors are all watching assistant district attorney Matthew Colangelo, who is standing behind a lectern as he delivers his opening statement. Trump is to his left, looking straight ahead.

Prosecution is laying out the timeline of the case, including when hush money payments began

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said that the “conspiracy began” a few months after Donald Trump announced his candidacy in 2015 at a meeting with Trump, David Pecker and Michael Cohen.

They “formed a conspiracy at that meeting to influence the presidential election by concealing negative information about Mr. Trump in order to help him get elected,” Colangelo said.

Colangelo said that the conspiracy extended to payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels by Cohen, just weeks before the 2016 election.

See a timeline of key moments in the case.

Trump sits back and doesn't look at prosecutor during opening statement

As assistant district attorney Matthew Colangelo is giving the prosecution’s opening statement, Donald Trump is sitting back in his chair and not looking toward Colangelo as he speaks.

"This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up," prosecutor says in opening statement

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo began the opening statements with a focus on the case against former President Donald Trump.

“This case is about a criminal conspiracy and a cover-up,” Colangelo said.

“The defendant Donald Trump orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election. Then he covered up that criminal conspiracy by lying in his New York business records over and over and over again.”

Prosecution kicks off opening statements in trial

Assistant district attorney Matthew Colangelo is now delivering opening statements for the prosecution.

"Only you are authorized to render a verdict," judge tells the jury

Jurors cannot discuss the case with each other until deliberations begin to avoid a premature decision, Judge Juan Merchan said.

“Only you have promised to be fair. No one else has been so qualified for this trial,” Merchan told the jurors.

He reminded them again that they cannot read any news coverage of the case.

Judge tells jurors not to research case

Judge Juan Merchan told jurors not to research the case or read about it, and not to communicate with anyone face-to-face or by any other means about it.

Jurors must report any attempts to influence them, judge says

Judge Juan Merchan says the jurors must immediately notify the court of any attempts to influence any member of the jury.

An alternate juror will only be substituted in an "extraordinary emergency," judge says

It takes an “extraordinary emergency” before an alternate juror is substituted into the jury, Judge Juan Merchan says, noting the law expects the 12 jurors who begin the trial to be the same 12 who reach a verdict.

Judge reminds alternate jurors that they must pay same close attention in trial as seated jurors 

“An alternate juror is expected to pay the same close attention to the case as any one of the first 12 jurors,” Judge Juan Merchan told the jury.

Six alternate jurors were selected last week. New York criminal procedure law outlines several cases in which an alternate would replace a juror, and that juror would be dismissed, during a trial. That includes: 

  • If a juror gets sick “or other incapacity.” 
  • The juror is not available to serve on the jury anymore. 
  • If the court finds additional information or facts are revealed after jury selection that suggests the juror is “grossly unqualified” to be on the case. 
  • If a juror does not show up to court. 
  • The juror engaged in “misconduct of a substantial nature” — but not conduct that would warrant a mistrial. 

The state law also says alternates must have the same qualifications and go through the same examination as other jurors.

CNN’s Elise Hammond contributed reporting to this post.

Judge reminds jury: "You have promised to be a fair juror"

Judge Juan Merchan explains that the jury will be asked to reach a verdict, noting the jurors should not allow biases or stereotypes to influence their decision.

“As a jury, you are asked to make a very important decision about another member of the community,” Merchan adds.

Lawyers are not allowed to comment during witness testimony, judge says

Judge Juan Merchan says lawyers are not allowed to comment during witness testimony, telling the jurors that happens in movies and on television shows but not at a real trial.

“That is not allowed,” Merchan said. “That happens on TV and in the movies, that does not happen in real trials.”

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass and Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche smiled at the comment.

Judge tells jurors witnesses in trial may only testify about "matters they have personal knowledge of"

Witnesses may only testify to “matters they have personal knowledge of,” Judge Juan Merchan tells the jurors, noting that they are not permitted to guess or speculate about what he or she thinks another person may have seen.

Possible witnesses: Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels, Trump’s long-time friend and former chief executive of American Media David Pecker, and Trump’s former campaign spokesperson Hope Hicks are among the high-profile witnesses who are planning to be called by prosecutors, according to people familiar with the case. 

Other witnesses will include bankers and Trump Organization officials who handled the payments, lawyers involved in the transaction, as well as other people who worked on Trump’s campaign, the people said. 

Trump’s lawyers said they plan to call at least two witnesses in their case: Bradley Smith, a former commissioner of the Federal Election Commission, and Alan Garten, the top legal officer of the Trump Organization.

Read up on the key players in the case and possible witnesses.

Jury should use their "varied life experiences" in evaluating witness credibility, judge says

Jurors should bring all of their “varied life experiences” in evaluating witnesses’ credibility, Judge Juan Merchan tells the jury.

There's no "formula" for judging the accuracy of witness testimony, judge says

Judge Juan Merchan tells the jurors “there is no particular formula” for evaluating the truthfulness and accuracy of witness testimony.

Judge Merchan tells jury they can take notes but should be "brief"

Judge Juan Merchan explained to jurors that they could take notes but said they should be “brief” and not distract them from watching the proceedings.

“A juror’s notes are not a substitute for a recorded transcript of the testimony,” Merchan says.

Trump looks at jury as judge continues to give instructions

Donald Trump is now looking toward over to the jury box as Judge Juan Merchan continues to speak.

Verdict can't rest on "baseless speculation," judge tells jurors

“Whatever your verdict may be, it must not rest on baseless speculation,” Judge Juan Merchan tells the jury. He added that their verdict can not be “influenced in any way” by bias.

The hush money trial is happening as Trump juggles his campaign and presidential immunity hearing

The hush money trial is keeping former President Donald Trump happening simultaneously as he attempts to manage other key legal troubles and during a critical time in his campaign, CNN chief legal affairs correspondent Paula Reid said.

Trump is unable to attend Thursday’s historic Supreme Court oral arguments regarding whether he can be granted presidential immunity in his legal cases, Reid said. The former president also may not be able to attend his son’s graduation, although Judge Juan Merchan said he would consider it.

“But look he’s a criminal defendant, he has to attend every single day of court unless he gets waiver, but the jurors, the judge has signaled, he’s going work around their schedule,” Reid said.

Jury must find Trump not guilty if burden of proof isn't met, judge says

Judge Juan Merchan tells jurors they must find the defendant not guilty if the burden of proof is not met.

Prosecutors must prove that Donald Trump committed the crimes he’s accused of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Judge tells jury "burden of proof never shifts" to the defendant

“The burden of proof never shifts” from the prosecution to the defendant, Judge Juan Merchan told the jury.

Judge tells jurors "defendant is presumed to be innocent" throughout these proceedings

Judge Juan Merchan tells the jurors that, “I remind you throughout these proceedings that the defendant is presumed to be innocent.”

Trump closes his eyes as judge gives jury instructions

Donald Trump’s eyes are closed as Judge Juan Merchan is delivering his instructions to the jury.

Evidence can include documents and testimony, judge tells jury

Judge Juan Merchan is describing what is evidence, including documents, testimony and physical evidence.

The jurors’ eyes are all locked on the judge during his explanations.

"You must decide this case on the evidence," judge tells jurors

“You must decide this case on the evidence,” Judge Juan Merchan said in court, telling jurors to remember that what the lawyers say “is not evidence.”

Merchan determines which of Trump's past cases can be brought up in this trial

Before opening arguments began Monday, Judge Juan Merchan determined that some of Donald Trump’s past wrongdoings and legal matters can be brought up in his hush money trial, but others cannot.

Merchan issued his ruling from last Friday’s Sandoval hearing - a routine process through which the court will determine to what extent Trump’s past wrongdoing can be brought up in the current trial.

Merchan said he would allow Trump to be cross-examined on the verdict in the New York civil fraud case brought by state Attorney General Letitia James that found he violated the law by fraudulently inflating the value of his properties. Merchan said he would also allow prosecutors to ask Trump about the two violations of Judge Arthur Engoron’s gag order during that trial last fall. Trump was fined $15,000 for those violations.

Trump shook his head as Merchan said that Engoron found he violated the law.

Prosecutors will also be allowed to ask Trump about both E. Jean Carroll verdicts in federal court where juries found that Trump defamed Carroll by denying her allegations that he raped her. Trump was ordered to pay $83.3 million for defaming Carroll.

Merchan will also allow prosecutors to elect testimony from the former president about the settlement he reached with the New York attorney general that led to the dissolution of the Donald J. Trump Foundation.

The judge won’t allow prosecutors to ask Trump about the ruling in Florida that sanctioned Trump for filing a frivolous lawsuit against Hillary Clinton.

The 2022 Trump Org tax fraud conviction is also off limits for prosecutors if Trump testifies, Merchan ruled.

Trial will begin with prosecutors' opening statement, judge tells jury

“The trial formally begins with what the law calls an opening statement by the prosecutor,” Judge Juan Merchan told the jurors.

Judge is instructing jurors ahead of opening statements

Judge Juan Merchan is instructing the jurors ahead of opening statements as they sit in their jury box.

Merchan says his instructions to the jury will take about 30 minutes.

Judge rules prosecutors can't ask about 2022 Trump Org. tax fraud conviction if Trump testifies

Judge Juan Merchan also ruled the 2022 Trump Organization tax fraud conviction is also off-limits for prosecutors if Donald Trump testifies.

The judge is also not allowing prosecutors to ask Trump about the ruling in Florida when the judge sanctioned Trump for filing a frivolous lawsuit against Hilary Clinton.

Judge asks for jury to be brought in

The judge just told the court officers, “Let’s get the jury.”

Judge is also allowing prosecutors to elicit Trump testimony on NY attorney general settlement

Judge Juan Merchan is also allowing prosecutors to elicit testimony from Donald Trump about the settlement he reached with the New York attorney general that led to the dissolution of the Donald J Trump Foundation.

Prosecutors will be permitted to ask Trump about the E. Jean Carroll verdicts

Prosecutors will be permitted to ask former President Donald Trump about both E. Jean Carroll verdicts in federal court where juries found that Trump defamed her when he denied her rape allegations.

Trump shakes his head as Judge Merchan says the judge in civil fraud case found he violated the law

Donald Trump shook his head as Judge Juan Merchan said that Judge Arthur Engoron found he violated the law by fraudulently inflating the value of his assets.

Prosecutors allowed to ask Trump about 4 separate proceedings

Judge Juan Merchan said that if Donald Trump takes the stand, the court will allow prosecutors “to inquire into the following six determinations including four separate proceedings.”

He is now reading through them.

He will allow Trump to be cross-examined on the civil fraud verdict that found he violated the law by fraudulently inflating the value of his properties and was ordered to pay penalties.

Merchan will also allow prosecutors to ask Trump about the two violations of Judge Arthur Engoron’s gag order during the trial last fall.

Trump sitting back and not reacting as judge reads ruling

As Judge Juan Merchan is reading his decision, Donald Trump is sitting back in his chair, not reacting one way or the other.

The judge is about to read a Sandoval ruling in court. Here's what that means

Judge Juan Merchan is about to read a Sandoval ruling.

On Friday, the judge held a routine hearing to address Donald Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if a defendant testifies.

The judge noted that the law gives a trial judge a “wide range of discretion” in deciding what to allow to be used in cross-examination of a defendant. 

Judge won't allow "Access Hollywood" tape to be played as evidence

Judge Juan Merchan said he is not changing his ruling on the “Access Hollywood” tape and not allowing the tape to be played as evidence. He said he will allow prosecutors to show emails describing what was said on the tape.

Juror staying on panel despite concerns about media attention

A juror who expressed concerns about media attention is staying on the panel, Judge Juan Merchan said.

“Juror number nine is going to remain with us,” Merchan said, noting “that’s not going to be an issue.”

Lawyers return after meeting with juror

The lawyers have returned after meeting with a juror who voiced concerns about the media attention of the case.

Trump's defense attorney believes "we have a winning case"

Will Scharf, Donald Trump’s defense attorney says his legal team is going to focus on the facts and cut through “all the sensationalism” to defend the former president, speaking to CNN’s Jake Tapper.

Scharf said “we believe we have a winning case” and said he hoped the jury would be able to “cut through all the noise.”

“This is a winning case for us. Donald Trump did nothing wrong,” he claimed.

“If we can just focus on the facts and if we can drive home what the facts are to the jury, I don’t think any of this other noise I going to end up mattering,” he said.

Donald Trump sitting alone at defense table

Former President Donald Trump is sitting alone, looking straight ahead as members of his defense team, and prosecution meet with Judge Juan Merchan and the juror who expressed concerns about the media attention.

Juror voices concerns about media attention

One of the jurors called the court on Friday, saying they have concerns about the media attention.

Judge Juan Merchan said that they will speak to the juror in his chambers today.

The lawyers are now going to the side room to join the juror. Former President Donald Trump has remained seated at the defense table by himself.

Court is in session  

The court is in session. Opening statements are expected to begin soon.

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo says their opening statement will be 40 minutes. Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche says his opening statement will be 25 minutes.

Court is ending at 12:30 p.m. ET today because an alternate has a dentist appointment.

“That’s just something we have to do” to make sure we don’t lose that alternate, Judge Juan Merchan said.

The case is called "The People of the State of New York v Donald Trump"

Judge Juan Merchan greeted Donald Trump at the start of court today, saying “Good morning, Mr. Trump” ahead of opening statements in the former president’s criminal hush money case.

The case is being called “The People of the State of New York v Donald Trump.”

Trump enters the courtroom

Former President Donald Trump just entered the courtroom after talking to cameras in the hallway.

He walked down the center aisle speaking with this attorney Todd Blanche. He did not scan the rows of the galley like he usually does.

Trump is seated in the defendant’s seat.

Trump slams hush money trial as "election interference" and "unfair" in remarks outside courtroom

Former President Donald Trump addressed reporters just before entering the Manhattan courtroom as opening statements in the hush money trial against him are set to begin.

“It’s election interference. Everybody knows it,” Trump said outside the courtroom. “It’s very unfair.”

He then said that the trial is a “witch hunt” aimed at hurting the opponent “of the worst president in history” in coordination with Washington.

See our fact checks of Trump’s past claims on the trial here.

Prosecutors have entered the courtroom

The prosecution team has now entered the courtroom ahead of opening statements in the first criminal trial of former President Donald Trump.

Prosecutors Joshua Steinglass, Matthew Colangelo and Susan Hoffinger are seated at the table. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is also in the court. He is sitting in the front row behind his team.

Here's what prosecutors have to prove

Former President Donald Trump is on trial in Manhattan for his alleged role in a hush money scheme to silence his alleged mistresses before the 2016 election. He faces 34 counts related to “falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.” 

Prosecutors need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump falsified business records with the intent to commit or conceal another crime, but they don’t have to prove that Trump committed that crime. The prosecution theory is that the second crime could be in violation of federal and state election laws or state tax laws regarding how the reimbursements to Michael Cohen were handled. 

Trump’s attorneys have kept their defense close to the vest, but in court filings they’ve indicated that they plan to attack the credibility of Cohen and Stormy Daniels and paint them as liars who are motivated by grudges and money. 

Trump’s legal team is led by Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, two former federal prosecutors from New York, and Susan Necheles, a veteran criminal defense lawyer with deep experience in New York and before Merchan. Necheles represented Trump’s business at its tax fraud trial in 2022. The company was convicted. 

Outside lawyers who have been following the case closely say Trump is likely to argue that hush money payments are legal and distance the former president from the repayment scheme and bookkeeping handled by his trusted employees. They may also argue the payments were made to prevent embarrassment to Trump’s family and not to influence the election. Trump could also testify in his own defense. He has testified in two recent civil trials, after regretting not taking the stand in a prior civil trial, but the stakes are higher in a criminal case.

Trump's motorcade arrives at courthouse ahead of opening statements

Donald Trump’s motorcade has arrived at the Manhattan courthouse where the former president is expected to attend opening statements in his historic criminal trial.

Trump has in the past spoken to media in the courthouse hallway ahead of court proceedings, which get underway at 9:30 a.m. ET.

The court is expected to adjourn at 2 p.m. ET today due to the Passover holiday.

The key players in the New York hush money case

Opening statements in Donald Trump’s criminal New York hush money trial are set to begin this morning, more than a year after the former president was indicted in the case.

Trump has been accused of taking part in an illegal conspiracy to undermine the integrity of the 2016 election and an unlawful plan to suppress negative information, which included a hush money payment made to an adult-film star to hide an affair. Trump has denied the affair.

Prosecutors allege that Trump allegedly disguised the transaction as a legal payment and falsified business records numerous times to “promote his candidacy.” Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records. He has pleaded not guilty.

David Pecker, the former chairman of American Media Inc., which publishes the National Enquirer. Pecker will be the first witness called by the district attorney’s office, according to a person familiar with the plans.

Read about the key people in the case below:

Trump is on his way to court 

Former President Donald Trump is en route to the Manhattan courthouse where opening statements will begin this morning in his hush money criminal trial. 

Jury is set to hear opening statements in Trump's first criminal trial. Here's how today could play out

The historic first criminal trial of former president and GOP front-runner Donald Trump – which some have dubbed the trial of the century — gets underway today with opening statements at 9:30 a.m. ET in Manhattan Criminal court.

Here’s how the day could play out:

  • After opening statements, the prosecution will call its first witness, expected to be Trump’s long-time friend and former chief executive of American Media David Pecker, according to a source familiar.
  • Court will end at 2 p.m. ET today, due to the Passover holiday.
  • Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels, Pecker, and Trump’ former campaign spokesperson Hope Hicks are among the high-profile witnesses who are planning to be called by prosecutors, according to people familiar with the case. Other witnesses will include bankers and Trump Organization officials who handled the payments, lawyers-involved in the transaction, as well as other people who worked on Trump’s campaign, the people said.

The judge also said he’d rule Monday morning on what prosecutors can ask Trump if he testifies. Prosecutors say if Trump testifies, they want to use his past legal run-ins to discredit him to the jury — this includes his Civil Fraud and E. Jean Carroll defamation verdicts among other legal run-ins. Trump’s defense disputed every item the prosecutors wanted to bring up. Trump said again outside the courtroom Friday that he will testify.

Alternates ensure a trial can continue if a seated juror cannot proceed. Here's when they may step in 

Attorneys selected a jury of 12 New Yorkers along with six alternates before opening statements began.

Both sides know jury selection is one of the most important parts of the trial. These are the people who will hear the evidence and determine the historic outcome. Alternates ensure the trial can continue to the end if a seated juror cannot proceed.

New York criminal procedure law outlines several cases in which an alternate would replace a juror, and that juror would be dismissed, during a trial.

That includes:

  • If a juror gets sick or has some “other incapacity”
  • The juror is not available to serve on the jury anymore
  • If the court finds additional information or facts are revealed after jury selection that suggests the juror is “grossly unqualified” to be on the case
  • If a juror does not show up to court
  • The juror engaged in “misconduct of a substantial nature” — but not conduct that would warrant a mistrial

The state law also says alternates must have the same qualifications and go through the same examination as other jurors. Alternates will listen to the entire trial, but won’t participate in deliberations.

Trump's defense attorney will give a relatively short opening statement, focusing on witness credibility

The opening statement from Trump’s defense attorney Todd Blanche is expected to be relatively short today, though there is no time limit set by the judge, according to a person familiar with the approach.

The defense is also expected to focus on the credibility of witnesses, as they continue to attempt to undermine or limit expected witness testimony from Michael Cohen, Stormy Daniels and others. 

Analysis: Opening statements to show the personal and political stakes of Trump’s first criminal trial

Donald Trump was once, and may soon be again, the most powerful man in the world. But on Monday, his diminished reality as a criminal defendant will become clear during opening statements in his first criminal trial.

The presumptive GOP presidential nominee has long chafed at the constraints of the law, the Constitution and general decorum as he’s presented himself as an omnipotent force throughout his business and political career.

But with jury selection now complete in his hush money trial in Manhattan, Trump’s fate is in the hands of prosecutors, his attorneys, a judge and 12 people, who, according to bedrock principles of the legal system, are regarded as peers of the ex-president.

Nothing is more antithetical to Trump’s lifelong operating assumption that because of who he is, he is immune from such accountability.

Just over six months from the election that could see him restored to the White House, Trump has little ability to dictate action in proceedings in which his liberty may be at stake.

His normal weapons of histrionics, obfuscation and intimidation have no currency inside a courtroom. The fact that he is compelled to be in court four days a week for multiple weeks is also a serious inconvenience to the Republican candidate.

Regardless of its outcome, this trial is underscoring how the presumptive GOP nominee is like no other presidential candidate in history.

Whether or not he’s a convicted felon by Election Day, voters will be reminded of questions around his character and his many legal entanglements – with three more criminal cases looming, all in which he’s pleaded not guilty.

Read Collinson’s full analysis ahead of opening statements in Trump’s first criminal trial.

Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker expected to be first witness called in trial, a source says

The first witness to be called by the Manhattan district attorney’s office in Donald Trump’s criminal hush money trial is expected to be David Pecker, according to a person familiar with the plans.

As the then-chairman of American Media Inc., which publishes the National Enquirer, Pecker was involved in numerous “catch-and-kill” schemes he orchestrated on behalf of Trump, and he allegedly helped broker the deal with adult film star Stormy Daniels which is at the center of the Trump hush money case.

The New York Times first reported on the expected witness. The district attorney’s office is expected to call him after opening statements are completed.

More about Pecker’s role in the case: According to court documents, an agent for Daniels contacted AMI in October 2016 and said she was willing to go public with her allegations of an affair with Trump. Pecker then allegedly contacted Michael Cohen, who subsequently negotiated the deal, per court filings from Cohen’s plea agreement.

In a separate incident, AMI agreed to pay model and actress Karen McDougal $150,000 months before the 2016 election for her silence about an alleged affair with Trump. While this payment is not part of the charges against the former president, prosecutors are expected to use it to establish a pattern of such payments. Pecker has been granted immunity in exchange for his testimony and AMI signed a non-prosecution agreement with prosecutors.

GOP lawmakers struggle to defend Trump’s conduct in hush money case

Reublican lawmakers struggled last week to defend former President Donald Trump’s conduct connected to his hush money trial, instead going after the prosecution when asked by CNN.

Several Republicans expressed uneasiness with the allegation Trump paid off adult film actress Stormy Daniels to cover up their extramarital affair. 

  • Rep. Barry Loudermilk told CNN “it does, personally” concern him, but argued what’s done is done. “I mean, it’s, it’s nothing that I would engage in. And I wish others would not, but it’s a fact of things that have happened, and those are also things that had happened in the past,” he said. The Georgia Republican insisted voters were inclined to “overlook” Trump’s conduct. 
  • Sen. Cynthia Lummis agreed, saying she didn’t approve of Trump’s alleged actions. However, she argued the trial wouldn’t hurt his campaign because voters would see the prosecution as politically motivated. “I think that Americans are just very cynical about whether these trials are contrived or whether they’re legitimate,” she said.

Other Republicans dodged when pressed for their opinion on Trump’s conduct, instead attacking Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. 

  • Sen. Josh Hawley called the trial “absurd,” saying, “Those are allegations we still have a chance to disprove. What disturbs me is the case itself. We’ve never — I mean even people on the left are like, ‘This case is ridiculous.’”
  • Rep. John Duarte, a vulnerable House Republican whose district voted for President Joe Biden in 2020, would not say whether he had any personal issues with Trump’s conduct. When pressed, he argued voters would be more concerned with the economy than the trial. He agreed with Hawley, who said most of this information about Trump is not new, and is not likely to change any minds.
  • Sen. Mike Braun also expressed concern over whether Trump would get a “fair trial,” dodging when pressed about his alleged conduct. “You get so much stuff that comes around, all that — I kind of don’t give it a lot of thought. The justice system is in motion. We’ll see if it’s a fair trial,” he said. 
  • Sen. Thom Tillis argued no one should make any judgments before the trial has ended. “I’m not going to judge anybody. I’m going to let the court process run through it,” he said. The North Carolina Republican refused to say if he’d continue supporting the former president if he is convicted in this case. 

Opening statements will begin today. Catch up on what happened Friday in Trump's hush money trial

Opening statements are set to begin Monday at 9:30 a.m. ET, after the full jury panel was seated last week in the hush money trial against Donald Trump. There are 12 jurors and six alternates who will hear the criminal case against the former president.

Remember: Court will be a half day on Monday and Tuesday due to Passover, ending at 2 p.m. ET each day.

Catch up on what happened last week before we dive into opening statements:

Finishing jury selection:

  • The remaining five alternates were sworn in on Friday. All 12 jurors and one alternate were selected Thursday.
  • Before the lunch break, Judge Juan Merchan gave the jurors instructions not to discuss the case with others or research it. He said the court cannot start until all 18 jurors are present each day.

Debating the use of Trump’s past legal isues:

  • The judge held a Sandoval hearing Friday afternoon after the full jury was sworn in. The routine procedure aimed to address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask about it if the defendant testifies.
  • Prosecutors want to bring up past cases — including a $355 million civil fraud order and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case — but the former president’s legal team argues those issues aren’t relevant to the case at hand.
  • The judge said lawyers will have his decision on that matter by Monday.
  • It’s not yet clear whether the former president will testify. But coming out of the courtroom Friday, Trump said “yes” when asked whether he would take the stand.

Meantime: A New York appeals court judge denied Trump’s motion for an interim stay pending a change of venue appeal. This was the latest attempt by the former president to stop the hush money trial before opening statements.