Day 4 of Trump New York hush money trial | CNN Politics

Live Updates

Day 4 of Trump New York hush money trial

The Lead Jeremy Saland Stacy Schneider Trump Trial Jury Alternates Tapper_00001530.png
What we know about the Trump trial jury
06:37 - Source: CNN

What we covered here

  • Opening statements are expected to begin Monday in Donald Trump’s New York hush money criminal trial. A full 12-person jury and six alternate jurors were selected this week over the course of four days. Read about the panel here.
  • In a hearing this afternoon, Trump’s attorneys argued against allowing prosecutors to question the former president about his past legal issues if he testifies, including the $355 million civil fraud judgment and E. Jean Carroll defamation case. The judge said the lawyers will have his decision on the matter by Monday.
  • Trump told reporters that he would testify during the trial.
  • Outside the courthouse, a man lit himself on fire Friday afternoon, law enforcement said. A motive is not clear. Police said there are no public safety threats following the incident, and officials are reviewing security protocols around the court.
108 Posts

We’ve wrapped up our live updates. Learn more about Friday’s proceedings by scrolling through the posts below, and return on Monday for more live coverage of Trump’s hush money criminal trial.

Man who lit himself on fire outside of the courthouse has died, law enforcement official says

The man who lit himself on fire outside of the Manhattan courthouse where Donald Trump’s trial was taking place died Friday night, a senior law enforcement official told CNN.

NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey B. Maddrey said earlier that the man walked into the center of Collect Pond Park, which is directly across from the courthouse.

He opened his backpack and took out pamphlets that he scattered in the park before setting himself on fire.

The man was taken to Cornell Burn Center earlier in critical condition. Police had said they thought it was not likely that he would survive.

Key takeaways from the final day of jury selection in Trump's hush money trial

The historic first criminal trial of a former US president begins with opening statements on Monday.

Judge Juan Merchan swiftly moved through consideration of roughly 200 potential jurors to find a jury pool of 18 by midday Friday, swearing in 12 jurors and six alternates who will decide Donald Trump’s fate in the New York hush money case.

Here are takeaways from the final day of jury selection:

  • The jury is set: Four women and one man were added to the jury on Friday as five of the six alternates for the case. They will sit in the jury box and will hear the duration of the trial, but they will only be put on the jury should one or more of the 12 jurors be excused from the case. Prosecutors focused their questions in the case on preparing the jurors to accept testimony from less-than-favorable witnesses, like Michael Cohen. Trump’s attorneys, meanwhile, were almost singularly focused on a single question: What did jurors think about Donald Trump?
  • Final round of juror questions highlights emotional decision for potential jurors: There were several emotional moments during Friday morning’s questioning of potential jurors, with two jurors telling the judge in the middle of voir dire that they no longer felt they could serve. One female prospective juror who works in sales for a trading company began crying when she was handed the microphone. At one point after that jury had left, another juror raised her hand and told the court she started feeling “high anxiety” as she sat and listened to a line of questioning about the credibility of witnesses.
  • Trump is still trying to stop his trial: Despite seating a jury, Trump’s legal team again tried to stop the trial in its tracks with another strategic appeal. In a new motion filed Friday morning, Trump’s lawyers once again asked an appeals court to temporarily halt the trial until they ruled on Trump’s appeal to move the venue of the hush money trial out of Manhattan. The motion was denied.
  • A hearing on Trump’s gag order violations is set for Tuesday: Despite Trump’s attempts to delay, opening statements in his criminal trial will begin Monday morning. On Tuesday, the morning will shift to Trump’s discussion of witnesses in the case, as Merchan plans to hold a hearing on social media posts by the former president that prosecutors say violated his gag order. They’re asking the judge to fine Trump $1,000 per post and remind him that violations of the gag order could result in imprisonment.

5 alternate jurors were selected Friday. Here's what we know about them

The full panel in Donald Trump’s hush money trial has been set after five alternate jurors were selected Friday.

Remember: A full 12-person jury was seated earlier this week, along with one alternate juror.

Here’s what we know about the alternate jurors selected Friday:

Alternate Juror #1

  • A woman originally from Spain
  • Not currently working
  • Married with adult children
  • Likes to travel
  • Says she does not follow the news and does not have any social media accounts
  • Says she doesn’t “have strong opinions about former President Donald Trump that would interfere” with her ability to be a fair and impartial juror

Alternate Juror #3

  • A native New Yorker
  • He is a fan of martial arts

Alternate Juror #4

  • A contract specialist who has previously lived in New Jersey and Oregon
  • She is married with two children
  • Says she likes to see live music and take her boys to basketball games
  • Says she’s “not a big news person” but looks at The New York Times, Reuters and the BBC
  • Does have social media profiles but doesn’t post or use them

Alternate Juror #5

  • Works for a clothing company
  • Married
  • Says she gets her news from Google

Alternate Juror #6

  • Project manager for a construction company
  • She is divorced with three sons
  • Her boyfriend is in law enforcement
  • Says she listens to true crime podcasts
  • Her father was convicted of a federal crime when she was in high school but she said she was shielded from the details

The full jury is sworn in. Catch up on what happened ahead of opening statements in the hush money trial

The full jury panel has now been seated in the hush money trial against Donald Trump, clearing the way for opening statements to start on Monday.

There are 12 jurors and six alternates who will hear the case against the former president.

Opening statements are set to begin Monday at 9:30 a.m. ET. Court will be a half day on Monday and Tuesday due to Passover, ending at 2 p.m. ET each day.

Leaving the courthouse Friday, Trump again called the trial a “giant witch hunt.” Just hours after jury selection finished, an appeals court denied Trump’s latest attempt to stop the trial from going forward.

Here’s what happened today:

Finishing jury selection:

  • The remaining five alternates were sworn in on Friday. All 12 jurors and one alternate were selected Thursday.
  • The day started with a group of 22 potential jurors answering a questionnaire and facing more questions from lawyers on both sides.
  • Trump watched the alternates’ answers very closely as they shared their opinions of him, turning toward the jury box as they responded. 
  • Before the lunch break, Judge Juan Merchan gave the jurors instructions not to discuss the case with others or research it. He said the court cannot start until all 18 jurors are present each day.

Sandoval hearing:

  • The judge held a Sandoval hearing in the afternoon after the full jury was sworn in. The routine procedure aimed to address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask about it if the defendant testifies.
  • Prosecutors want to bring up past cases — including a $355 million civil fraud order and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case — but the former president’s legal team argues those issues aren’t relevant to the case at hand.
  • The judge said lawyers will have his decision on that matter by Monday.
  • It’s not yet clear whether the former president will testify. But coming out of the courtroom, Trump said “yes” when asked whether he would take the stand.

Meantime: A New York appeals court judge denied Trump’s motion for an interim stay pending a change of venue appeal. This was the latest attempt by the former president to stop the hush money trial before opening statements.

Outside the courtroom:

  • A man lit himself on fire outside the courthouse, New York Police Chief of Department Jeffrey B. Maddrey said.
  • The man walked into the park across the street from the courthouse, throwing flyers into the air, according to Maddrey. He then pulled a canister of what police believe to be an accelerant and lit himself on fire, he said.
  • The man is in critical condition at Cornell Burn Unit.
  • NYPD Chief of Detectives Joe Kenny said police have not determined if the incident was related to Trump’s trial. He said the man did post about the incident on social media and that his internet presence will be part of the ongoing investigation.

See courtroom sketches from Trump's first criminal trial

No cameras are allowed inside the Manhattan courtroom where Donald Trump’s hush money is underway, but sketch artists are capturing the scenes.

Trump’s request for interim stay of criminal trial is denied

A New York appeals court judge denied Donald Trump’s motion for an interim stay pending a change of venue appeal of his criminal trial.

This was the latest attempt by the former president to stop the hush money trial right before opening statements, which are set to be heard on Monday.

Judge Marsha Michael gave five minutes for each side to argue their case at the hastily arranged hearing Friday afternoon.

Trump says judge in New York hush money case “wants this to go as fast as possible”

Former President Donald Trump spoke to reporters as he exited the courtroom Friday, and said Judge Juan Merchan, who is presiding over the hush money trial, “wants this to go as fast as possible.”

“The trial starts on Monday, which is long before a lot of people thought. The judge wants this to go as fast as possible. That’s for his reasons, not for my reasons,” Trump said.

The former president also called the trial “a giant witch hunt” and railed against people involved in the separate New York civil fraud case — including Judge Arthur Engoron and New York Attorney General Letitia James — to make the case that Democrats are targeting him.

Court has adjourned

The court has adjourned for the day. Opening statements in the hush money trial are expected to begin Monday.

Trump says he'll testify

Donald Trump, asked whether he will testify in his hush money criminal trial, said “yes.”

The former president was answering questions from reporters on his way out of the courtroom.

Prosecutors offer to provide name of first witness to Trump attorneys, but warn it should not be tweeted out

Donald Trump’s attorney Susan Necheles renewed the defense’s request for prosecutors to turn over the name of the witness they plan to call on Monday.

She suggested that the prosecution share the name with Trump’s attorneys on condition that they don’t tell their client.

Prosecutors offered to provide the name of the first witness on Sunday

“And should that be tweeted it will be the last time,” Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said, referring to the notion that the former president tweet about the witness if they shared the name of the defense.

Lawyers argued about how much of Trump's criminal history can be brought up if he testifies. Here's a recap

Lawyers spent most of Friday afternoon working to outline some ground rules if former President Donald Trump testifies in his hush money trial in New York.

The Sandoval hearing was held after the remaining alternate jurors were selected and sworn in Friday morning. The goal of the hearing was to address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if a defendant testifies.

It’s not yet clear whether the former president will testify.

Here’s a recap of what happened:

  • Prosecutors want to bring up past cases — including a $355 million civil fraud order and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case — but the former president’s legal team argues those issues aren’t relevant to the case at hand.
  • Trump attorney Emil Bove accused prosecutors of “piling things on” and trying to confuse the jury about what’s actually at issue in the hush money criminal trial.
  • Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said Trump’s credibility is at the “core” of the trial. He said that’s an argument for allowing additional evidence, not excluding it.
  • At one point, Judge Juan Merchan questioned why it wouldn’t be relevant for prosecutors to try to impeach Trump’s credibility. Bove responded that there’s a cascading effect of having multiple civil lawsuits that are still under appeal.
  • The judge said he will reserve his decision for now, but the lawyers will have it by Monday.

Judge says Trump team appears to be re-arguing ruling on "Access Hollywood" tape

Judge Juan Merchan says that former President Donald Trump’s lawyers appear to be re-arguing his ruling on what can and can’t come in related to the infamous “Access Hollywood tape.”

Merchan said on Monday that he would not allow the tape to be played to jurors but would allow prosecutors to refer to what was said on the tape.

Trump attorney Todd Blanche is arguing that an email being introduced with the text of what was said went beyond what Merchan’s initial decision allowed for, which is why they asked for clarification. Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass says that this was already argued on Monday morning.

Merchan says he’s going to go back and read the transcript Monday and see if anything he said is inconsistent with his prior rulings. He said his main concern with the tape was that the jury would “hear your client’s voice,” see his face and his mannerisms.

“My concern is that would be extremely prejudicial,” he says.

"That has to end": Judge says defense cannot keep filing pre-motion letters

Judge Juan Merchan says that the defense cannot continue to keep filing pre-motion letters and motions to try to re-litigate decisions the judge has already made.

“I’ve entertained your motions, I’ve entertained your arguments in good faith. At some point, you need to accept my motions,” he says.

Donald Trump was glaring at Merchan as he was speaking to his attorneys.

The Sandoval hearing is over

The Sandoval hearing has concluded.

Judge Juan Merchan says he will reserve his decision for now, but the lawyers will have it by Monday.

Merchan went on to discuss several exhibits Trump’s lawyers are arguing should be precluded because of presidential immunity.

Attorneys are now raising other issues related to pre-motion letters. Prosecutors are arguing that the judge should reserve any judgment on evidentiary objections until trial.

Remember: A Sandoval hearing is a routine process that will determine what elements of Trump’s past legal issues can be brought up as part of the current hush money criminal trial.

At appeals court, Trump argues for change of venue and interim stay

At a hastily scheduled New York appeals court hearing Friday afternoon, Donald Trump’s attorney Cliff Robert called for an interim stay in the hush money trial and argued the venue should be changed from Manhattan. 

Robert argued that seating a jury in three days with so many potential jurors being dismissed for cause over bias is “untenable.”

He also cited a woman who was seated on the jury Tuesday and asked to be dismissed Thursday after she felt pressure from the media attention. Robert argued it showed how the publicity surrounding the case has made the trial unfair to Trump.

Steven Wu, the district attorney’s appeals lawyer, said the record shows the opposite: that “Jury selection has worked.”

He said there’s been a “robust process” to ensure jurors can be fair and impartial. He also pointed to the juror questionnaire that Wu said is longer than typically used.

Judge Marsha Michael said she would issue a ruling shortly.

Trump attorney accuses prosecutors of "piling things on" to confuse the jury

One of former President Donald Trump’s attorneys, Emil Bove, accused prosecutors of “piling things on” and trying to confuse the jury about what’s actually at issue in the hush money criminal trial.

The comment came during a back-and-forth over which elements of Trump’s past legal issues can be brought up in the current proceedings — part of a routine process called a Sandoval hearing.

Prosecutors want to bring up past cases — including a $355 million civil fraud order and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case — but the former president’s legal team argues those issues aren’t relevant to the case at hand.

Trump lawyer argues former president shouldn't be questioned about other legal issues as prosecutors push back

Donald Trump’s attorneys are arguing in court right now against bringing in his past legal cases and battles during the hush money criminal trial.

The former president is reacting in court as prosecutors bring up the allegations against him. Here’s a look at the cases:

  • Judgment in $355 million civil fraud order: Trump attorney Emil Bove said the prosecution should not be allowed to use Judge Arthur Engoron’s $355 civil fraud judgment against Trump. Bove also argued that Engoron’s ruling was subject to a preponderance of evidence standard, which is a lower standard than a criminal case. He said the charges in the civil fraud case are similar to the current case, and that the jury “may infer if it happened before Justice Engoron” under a different evidentiary standard, then they could believe “that it also happened beyond a reasonable doubt in this case.”
  • October 2023 gag order: Bove also objected to Engoron’s finding that Trump violated his gag order in October 2023, saying the team is concerned about introducing different standards of proof and confusing the jury. Trump was fined $10,000 after appearing to reference a court clerk in comments made outside the courtroom. Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said prosecutors can seek to impeach a witness’ credibility not just through criminal acts but also through “any prior immoral, vicious, illegal, and bad act conduct,” arguing that the violation of the gag order is relevant.
  • E. Jean Carroll defamation case: Bove also argued against allowing prosecutors to question Trump about the Carroll defamation case, arguing that it requires consideration of events “we very much dispute” which date all the way back to the 1990s. Bove argued that to “bring up Ms. Carroll’s allegation at this trial pushes the salaciousness onto another level.” Judge Juan Merchan asked, “Why don’t we not deal with the allegations then,” and just consider the findings in the case. Bove said that still isn’t acceptable. Colangelo argued that the Carroll trials deal with defamation from 2019 and 2022. “That’s not remote,” he said. Trump shook his head as Colangelo spoke about the former president defaming Carroll.

Bove also argued against including a lawsuit Trump filed against Hillary Clinton that was dismissed for being frivolous and in bad faith. Merchan questioned why that wouldn’t be relevant for prosecutors to try to impeach Trump’s credibility. “If that’s not Sandoval, I don’t know what is,” Merchan says after reading some of the opinion criticizing Trump’s frivolous lawsuit. Bove responds that there’s a cascading effect of having multiple civil lawsuits that are still under appeal.

Prosecutor: Witness credibility is at "core" of this trial

Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo said that as former Donald Trump chooses whether to testify during the trial, it’s clear that witness credibility is at the “core” of it — and that’s an argument for allowing additional evidence, not excluding it.

Trump attorney Emil Bove then moved on to discussing the Trump Organization verdict, arguing that prosecutors in that case — who are sitting to his right — said that those charges were not about Trump. “This case is not about Donald Trump,” Bove quoted prosecutor Susan Hoffinger as saying during that trial.

Judge Juan Merchan also presided over that trial, Colangelo says.

He says that prosecutors in that trial spoke “at length” about what Trump knew, countering the defense argument that a defendant in that case, Allen Weisselberg, had gone “rogue.”

Remember: In December 2022, two Trump Organization companies were found guilty on multiple charges of criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records connected to a 15-year scheme to defraud tax authorities by failing to report and pay taxes on compensation for top executives.

Trump and his family were not charged in this case, but the former president was mentioned repeatedly during the trial by prosecutors about his connection to the benefits doled out to certain executives, including company-funded apartments, car leases and personal expenses.

Judge Merchan says he is not going to allow a trial within a trial

Judge Juan Merchan said he won’t allow a trial within a trial as a Sandoval hearing got underway in the Manhattan courthouse.

A Sandoval hearing is a routine process through which the court will determine to what extent Trump’s past wrongdoing can be brought up in the current trial.

Merchan’s remark came as Trump’s attorneys argued the specifics of a previous $355 million civil fraud judgment against the former president, and whether the prosecution can use it as part of the current proceedings.

Trump was seen hunched forward with his arms on the table as his lawyer debated, with Merchan beside him.

Trump hunched forward as attorney makes argument

Donald Trump is hunched forward with his arms on the table as his lawyer debates his argument, with Judge Juan Merchan beside him.

Sandoval hearing now underway

The judge is holding a Sandoval hearing, a routine hearing that will address Donald Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if a defendant testifies.

The court is also reviewing a defense motion.

Trump attorney Emil Bove began by saying that the defense objects to each case that prosecutors want to raise.

Fact check: Trump repeats a false claim about Manhattan crime, which is nowhere near record levels

In a social media post during a break in the trial on Friday afternoon, former President Donald Trump repeated a familiar claim that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the case against him, “has let Violent Crime in New York flourish at levels never seen before.”

Facts FirstTrump’s claim is false. Manhattan, like New York City as a whole, is nowhere close to an unprecedented level of violent crime. In reality, violent crime in the borough and the city has plummeted since the early 1990s.

For example, in 1990, when New York City set its all-time murder record, Manhattan recorded 503 murders. In 2023, it recorded 73 murders — a decline of about 85%. Similarly, Manhattan recorded 252 rapes in 2023, down about 63% from the 689 in 1990.

Judge says he won't require prosecutors to redact 39,000 contacts from Cohen's cell phones

Emil Bove, a member of Donald Trump’s legal team, says that Trump’s attorneys do not object to redacting personal identifying information from Michael Cohen’s cell phones, which includes Cohen’s contacts. But they object to the sealing of the entire exhibits in a public trial.

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger responds that redacting the documents would be “extremely, extremely burdensome,” saying it would require combing through thousands and thousands of pages and thousands of Cohen’s phone contacts.

Judge Juan Merchan then says he’s not going to require prosecutors to redact 39,000 contacts, when they only seek to introduce what’s relevant. He says that prosecutors only want to use what’s relevant, and if Trump’s lawyers see something that’s sealed that they want to use, he will look then.

Court is back in session for Trump's criminal trial

The court is back in session after taking a lunch break.

The court is discussing the prosecution’s motion for the sealing of exhibits related to Michael Cohen’s cell phones.

The judge is expected to also hold a Sandoval hearing this afternoon, a routine hearing that will address Donald Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if a defendant testifies.

Jury selection ended before the lunch break. A panel of 12 jurors and six alternates were seated Friday afternoon. Jury selection began on Monday.

Police say man who lit himself on fire threw pamphlets containing conspiracy theories

New York City police said the man who lit himself on fire outside the courthouse where Donald Trump’s trial is taking place threw pamphlets that “seemed to be propaganda based,” according to the chief of detectives.

Joseph Kenny described them as “almost a conspiracy-theory type of pamphlet.”

The papers contained “information in regards to Ponzi schemes and the fact that our local education institutes are fronts for the mob,” Kenny said. “So a little bit of conspiracy theory going on there.”

He said police would go through the man’s social media accounts during their investigation. Kenny said he was not aware that the man had any criminal history in New York and was not known to detectives before the incident.

NYPD chief says department will review security protocols following fire outside of courtroom

Chief Jeffrey Maddrey of the New York Police Department said Friday afternoon that the department is “of course” going to review security protocols after a man set himself on fire outside the courtroom where former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial is taking place.

Maddrey clarified that the man did not breach security protocols as the park was open to the public.

“But, of course, we’re going to look at everything and with the magnitude of what’s going on around here, we’ll reassess our security with our federal partners,” Maddrey said.

Tarik Sheppard, the deputy commissioner of public information for the department, said that while he cannot share conversations had with Secret Service, “everyone involved in the trial inside is aware of the incident that took place outside today.”

Law enforcement ratcheted up security for the trial with a sophisticated and multilayered plan, officials previously told CNN.

Man who lit himself on fire is in critical condition, police say

The man who lit himself on fire outside the Manhattan courthouse where Donald Trump’s criminal trial is unfolding is in critical condition, police said on Friday.

New York Police Department Chief of Department Jeffrey B. Maddrey said the man is in Cornell Burn Unit.

NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny said police have not determined if the incident was related to Trump’s trial. He said the man did post about the incident on social media and that his internet presence will be part of the ongoing investigation.

Maddrey said the man walked into the center of Collect Pond Park, which is directly across from the courthouse where Trump is on trial. He opened his backpack and took out pamphlets that he scattered in the park.

“And then he pulls out a canister and pours some kind of liquid on himself — a liquid we believe is an accelerant — and he lights himself on fire,” Maddrey said at a news conference on Friday.

The man then fell into a police barrier and onto the ground, he said. People and officers in the area tried to put the fire out using their coats and fire extinguishers, Maddrey said.

This post has been updated with additional information from officials.

Prosecutors and Trump team are inside the courtroom

Prosecutors are in the courtroom. Former President Donald Trump also walked in with his attorneys and took his seat.

Trump is now chatting with his attorney Todd Blanche, who is seated to his left, before the judge enters.

NYPD says there are no public safety threats following courthouse “incident”

Kaz Daughtry, the New York Police Department deputy commissioner of operations, said on X there are no public safety threats following what police are referring to as an “incident” outside the courthouse where former President Donald Trump is on trial. 

“Just finished briefing the @nypdpc with @NYPDChiefOfDept and @NYPDDetectives regarding the incident that occurred at 80 Center Street. At this time there are no public safety threats, please expect increased traffic congestion in the area as our detectives conduct their investigation,” Daughtry said.

A man lit himself on fire outside of the courthouse, two law enforcement sources confirmed to CNN earlier Friday.

After throwing pamphlets into the air, the man poured gasoline from multiple containers over the top of his head, another senior law enforcement officer told CNN. 

The man was carrying two large signs — one advertising a Substack and one that said “Trump is with Biden and they’re about to fascist coup us” — photos provided by two law enforcement officials show. The one advertising the Substack had a driver’s license that officials believe belonged to the man taped to the corner. 

The NYPD is expected to brief news media outside the courthouse shortly.

What is a Sandoval hearing?

Donald Trump faces a Sandoval hearing this afternoon, opening the door for the former president to testify at his criminal trial as his defense team gauges the risk of letting him take the stand.

A Sandoval hearing involves an examination of the defendant’s criminal history. It is required under New York law when a defendant plans to testify in their own trial and is meant as an indicator of whether it would be a good idea for them to take the stand.

During the proceedings, both sides will discuss what prosecutors would be allowed to ask Trump on cross-examination. It’s not yet clear whether the former president will testify.

“You’ve heard many experts say this is not a good idea,” CNN chief legal affairs correspondent Paula Reid said Friday afternoon. “But this is something (Trump) clearly wants to do, and his team believes he can do this successfully, but they want to see how the trial goes.”

The hearing is set to begin at 3:15 p.m. ET.

Appeals court is hearing arguments this afternoon on Trump's motion to change venue of trial

A New York appeals court is hearing arguments Friday afternoon over Donald Trump’s motion to change venue, according to two sources.

Last week, Trump had asked the appeals court to stop the trial so they could argue over a change of venue saying he couldn’t get a fair trial in Manhattan.

An appellate judge denied the motion. The full panel is hearing Trump’s challenge over a change of venue.

The hearing comes an hour after jury selection was completed in the criminal trial. A panel of 12 jurors and six alternates were seated Friday afternoon. Jury selection began on Monday.

All eyes on the complete jury panel with an unusual makeup

Jury consultant Renato Stabile weighed in on the makeup of the jury after the selection process wrapped Friday afternoon.

“For sure alternates are going come into play because in a case like this, you’re going to lose some of the regular jurors,” he told CNN chief legal analyst Laura Coates.

Now that jury selection is complete, Stabile says lawyers on both sides will be monitoring the jurors’ social media posts to make sure they don’t comment publicly on the case.

The jury also includes at least two lawyers, a “very unusual” move that Stabile says is a big gamble.

“They’re going to be leaders in the jury room. The other jurors are going to be looking for them for their legal analysis even though they’re not supposed to be instructing on the law. … On the defense, I think it’s a very bold move.”

Having people with legal expertise on the jury could pose a risk for either side.

It could negatively affect the prosecution by diverting clarifying questions that would otherwise go to the judge, Coates said. But lawyers on the jury could be beneficial to the defense, as they might be able to raise questions about the burden of proof that might otherwise go unasked. 

Here's why gag order violations might not affect Trump that much

Although Donald Trump has been accused by the Manhattan district attorney’s office of violating his gag order at least 10 times, the consequences for the former president might be minimal, CNN legal analyst Elie Honig told Kate Bolduan on Friday morning.

In a hearing Tuesday, Judge Juan Merchan will have to decide between fining Trump up to $1,000 per violation and imprisoning him for up to 30 days.

“(Trump) is not going to care at all about that, he’d gladly pay a thousand dollars per Truth Social to lash out at Michael Cohen and other witnesses,” Honig said. “But I think Donald Trump has done the calculation — probably correctly — that there’s just no way this judge is going to lock (him) up for violating the gag order, and certainly not at this point.”

Honig noted that it’s a problem for trial management and courtroom order and could eventually become an issue for Trump as well.

Earlier today, Trump said outside the courtroom that the gag order “has to come off,” telling reporters that he “should be allowed to speak.”

Remember: A gag order was issued by Merchan in late March to stop Trump from making statements about witnesses, jurors, prosecutors, court staff or the family members of prosecutors and court staff.

Man lit himself on fire outside the courthouse where Trump's trial is underway

A man lit himself on fire outside the courthouse where the Trump trial is underway, New York City Police Department officials said.

NYPD Chief of Department Jeffrey B. Maddrey said the man walked into the center of Collect Pond Park, which is directly across from the courthouse. He opened his backpack and took out pamphlets that he scattered in the park before setting himself on fire.

A CNN team on the ground observed one of the flyers. It said “NYU is a mob front” and had various allegations of wrongdoings against the school.

NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny said police have not determined if the incident was related to Trump’s trial. He said the man did post about the incident on social media and that his internet presence will be part of the ongoing investigation.

At least one person used a fire extinguisher to try to put out the blaze, and an EMT rushed up to the man and tried to render aid, according to CNN’s Laura Coates, who narrated the scene unfolding in front of her outside the courthouse.

This post has been updated with details from New York City Police Department officials.

All jurors have been seated for Trump's trial: Here's a recap of the end of jury selection

The five remaining alternate jurors were sworn in Friday, meaning the full jury panel has now been seated in the hush money trial against Donald Trump.

There are 12 jurors and six alternates who will hear the case against the former president.

Opening statements are expected to start Monday.

Here’s a recap:

  • A group of 22 potential jurors from the most recent panel returned to the courtroom to answer their questionnaires. From there, lawyers from the prosecution and defense each got 25 minutes to ask the potential jurors questions.
  • Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger started her questioning by telling the potential jurors that this case is “only about whether the evidence” proves Trump is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. She also asked the potential jurors whether they could keep an open mind if former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testifies.
  • Trump attorney Susan Necheles focused her line of questions on biases toward Trump. “You all bring biases, and you particularly bring biases about someone who is as publicly and outspoken as President Trump,” she said.
  • Jurors dismissed: Six potential jurors were excused throughout the questionnaire and questions from the lawyers. The judge then dismissed three people for cause. Lawyers used their preemptory strikes to dismiss another two potential jurors.
  • Trump in court: The former president watched the alternates’ answers very closely as they shared their opinions of him, turning toward the jury box as they responded. 
  • Incident outside court: A man lit himself on fire outside of the courthouse where the trial is underway, two law enforcement sources confirmed to CNN. Further details were not immediately available.

The judge said there will be a Sandoval hearing after the lunch break around 3:15 p.m. ET. That routine hearing will address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if a defendant testifies.

Secret Service agent speaking to Trump in the gallery

Former President Donald Trump is standing in the gallery. A Secret Service agent is speaking to him.

He glanced over at the press pool as he walked out.

Court adjourned for lunch

The court is adjourned for lunch.

The judge is expected to hold a Sandoval hearing at 3:15 p.m. ET. This is a common preliminary proceeding that will be used to review Donald Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if he testifies.

Judge tells jurors he expects trial to begin Monday

Judge Juan Merchan tells the jurors, “I expect we’re going to begin the trial on Monday.”

Merchan is giving the jurors instructions not to discuss the case with others or research it.

“There are 18 jurors in total,” and we cannot start until all are present each day, Merchan says.

Alternate jurors sworn in

Jurors are being called up to be sworn in now.

The last five alternates sworn in include four women and one man.

The full jury panel has been selected

A sixth alternate juror has been selected. That means the full panel — 12 jurors and six alternates — has now been seated.

“We have our full panel,” the judge said.

A fifth alternate juror has been selected

One more alternate juror has been added to the jury. We’re up to five alternate jurors now.

Alternate No. 5 said she is married, works for a clothing company and gets her news from Google.

Prospective alternate dismissed

The potential alternate juror was dismissed after a review of his social accounts.

When referencing a quote in which he called Donald Trump “egomaniacal,” he said, “it’s not too far off base” from what he felt at the time.

He also said the top image of the Facebook account is his, but then suggests the posts in question are not his.

Prosecutors withdrew their opposition to the Trump team’s challenge for cause.

Trump team challenges potential juror over social posts describing former president as "the devil"

Donald Trump’s side is challenging another potential alternate juror over social media posts.

As Trump attorney Susan Necheles reads the posts — including one describing Trump’s “egomaniacal, sociopathic incompetence” and another saying that Trump is “the devil” — the former president does not appear to react as he’s sitting back in his chair.

The juror is brought into the room to confirm whether this is his social media account.

Judge dismisses juror: "Too many people worked too hard to get the case this far to see it jeopardized"

Judge Juan Merchan dismissed the potential juror Donald Trump’s lawyers had challenged, saying it’s out of an abundance of caution.

Trump’s team pointed to photos the potential juror had taken at a 2017 rally when seeking the challenge.

Explaining his decision to dismiss the juror, Merchan noted that while the juror described the rally as a women’s rally, he also had written a caption that it was a “massive anti-Trump rally.”

Potential juror being challenged says he doesn't remember his social media posts from 2016

The judge is asking the prospective juror Donald Trump’s team is challenging about his social media posts from 2016 that were flagged by Trump’s side, asking if he remembers the posts.

“I don’t remember. I guess they’re mine,” the prospective juror says.

The judge showed him pictures from a rally he attended in 2017 where he took pictures of signs in the crowd. One had the caption, “my sentiments exactly.” The judge asked him whether he agrees with the signs.

Trump attorney Susan Necheles asked him if he considered the rally an “anti-Trump rally,” and the prospective juror said he thought of it as a “women’s rights rally.” Necheles noted he used the phrase “anti-Trump rally” in his posts.

Trump's lawyers bring up another challenge

We are now in another challenge for cause from Donald Trump’s side, reviewing social media posts for a prospective alternate juror.

The juror has been brought into the room.

And another alternate juror selected

We’re now up to four alternate jurors.

Alternate juror No. 4 said she’s “not a big news person” but looks at The New York Times, Reuters and the BBC. She does have social media profiles but doesn’t post or use them.

Third alternate juror selected

A third alternate juror has been selected. The juror is a native New Yorker.

Judge grants Trump's team challenge for cause after potential juror spoke of former president's rhetoric

Judge Juan Merchan granted a Trump team challenge for cause, after she spoke about the former president’s rhetoric.

She said she believes Trump’s followers act “almost like they’re devout to him.”

“People felt emboldened by what Trump was saying to discriminate against me as a woman or discriminate against others based on genders, sexual orientation, or things of that nature,” she continued.

Judge Juan Merchan asked whether she can give an assurance that if she is a juror, she would be able to separate those issues from Trump as a defendant in this case.

“I can do that,” she said. “Just on the basis I think these are issues that are outside this courtroom.”

Trump attorney Susan Necheles said they are still challenging her because she said that she felt Trump discriminated against her personally. “When someone comes into this case with that kind of baggage,” Necheles argued, it’s a problem.

Merchan said that while he agreed the prospective juror was credible in being able to put aside her views, he said he granted the challenge to ensure “finality” of the case.

Prospective jurors become emotional during questioning

Several potential jurors became emotional during Friday’s voir dire proceedings as they were questioned about their ability to serve on Donald Trump’s trial.

Two people cited anxiety and unexpected stress from the process. They were invited to the bench to speak privately with Judge Juan Merchan before being dismissed.

“I’m sorry. I thought I could do this. I wouldn’t want someone who feels this way to judge my case either,” said one prospective juror. “This is so much more stressful than I thought.”

One female juror who was excused for technical reasons became emotional when talking about her past during the questionnaire portion. She began by telling the courtroom she thought she would be disqualified because she was previously convicted of a crime in another state. Trump watched intently as she shared her story with the parties at the bench.

Although she was not dismissed for being a convicted felon, she didn’t have required paperwork so she was disqualified.

What you just did is something that most people in this courtroom would not be able to do, so thank you,” Merchan said. As she was leaving, she said, “Good luck.”

A third prospective juror also became emotional when answering whether he had experience in the criminal justice system.

“It was a good experience, but it was a tough one and the system was helpful,” he said, adding that he had been accused of a crime. He is still part of the potential jury pool going through the voir dire process.

Another alternate has been selected

One of the people in the jury pool has been selected as the second alternate juror.

She is originally from Spain, is not currently working and is married with adult children. Earlier, she said she does not follow the news and does not have any social media accounts. She likes to travel and said she’s “very fortunate in life” not to have health issues.

“I don’t have strong opinions about former President Donald Trump that would interfere” with the ability to be a fair and impartial juror, she said.

Judge back on the bench

Judge Juan Merchan is back on the bench. He is starting with challenges, going seat-by-seat.

Attorneys are now discussing jury strikes

The defense attorneys and prosecutors are now huddling to discuss strikes.

Each side has two peremptory strikes per alternate and those strikes do not carry over. These strikes allow both sides to remove a potential alternate without cause.

Six jurors were excused before the strikes.

Trump attorney is done with questioning

Susan Necheles, a member of Donald Trump’s legal team, has finished questioning the potential alternate jurors.

They have left the room.

Prospective juror asked about his opinions on Trump: "I simply disregard it as much as I can"

One potential juror, asked about his opinion on Donald Trump, said that there has been “so much thrown around” in recent years.

“I simply disregard it as much as I can,” he said.

Potential juror says his opinion of Trump varies when looking at him as a person, politician or businessman 

Another male potential juror gave a very lengthy answer about whether he likes Donald Trump, saying he has five or six answers depending on whether it’s as a person, politician or businessman.

Trump leaned in to watch the potential juror closely as he went on to explain his reasoning.

The man noted that Trump is a family man and a businessman and successful. He said that when looking at Trump as a politician, there’s also the Republican Party — and “that’s where things get a little bit tricky.”

He said he likes lower taxes in this country but raises his concern that the Republican Party brings religion into people’s rights and women’s rights to their own bodies.

Trump turned his head and seemed to smirk in response to that answer.

Potential juror on Trump: "He's just a normal person like me"

One prospective juror who is a native New Yorker said Donald Trump, in his view, is “just a normal person.”

“We don’t really get starstruck or really care about anything like that,” the man said. “He’s just a normal person like me. That’s the way I see it.”

Trump watching closely as potential jurors share opinions about him

Trump attorney Susan Necheles asked potential jurors if they are bothered by allegations that the former president has been unfaithful in his marriage.

Trump leaned over and whispered to his lawyer Todd Blanche at the defense table as Necheles asked the line of questioning.

Trump is watching the alternates’ answers very closely as they share their opinions of him. He turned toward the jury box as they responded.

Prospective juror says she has favorable opinions on some of Trump's policies

One of the prospective jurors said she has a balanced opinion of Donald Trump.

“I actually have a favorable opinions about some of the policies he enacted — tax policy and foreign policies,” she said.

Defense attorney Susan Necheles asked the juror if she would feel pressure from friends who don’t like Trump. “I have never felt pressure,” she responded.

Potential alternate says her personal opinions of Trump are "more focused on his base"

Donald Trump’s attorney Susan Necheles spoke with a female juror who attended the women’s march, asking her what she thinks of Trump and if she has strong opinions about him.

She replies, “Not at the moment. I believe that my primary biases, I think my personal biases or opinions about President Trump are more focused on his base.”

The prospective juror added that “his rhetoric at times enables people to feel as if they have permission to discriminate or act on their negative impulses.”

She said she did not hold Trump responsible for the way his base responds to his rhetoric, saying it’s an issue for the “ballot box” and not necessarily in the courtroom.

She also said she’s embarrassed that she doesn’t know his policies. “Every time I’ve tried to listen to one of his rallies,” she said, “it feels like I’m intruding on a personal conversation.”

Potential juror dismissed after saying she's feeling "anxiety and self-doubt"

One of the potential jurors being questioned raised her hand and told the court that as she sits and listens to this line of questioning, she’s feeling “anxiety and self-doubt.”

She approached the bench to privately discuss the issue with the parties and was then dismissed. She quickly exited the courtroom.

Judge says jurors will determine credibility of witnesses after Trump attorney asks them about Cohen

Donald Trump’s attorney Susan Necheles is pushing back on prosecutor Susan Hoffinger’s statements about Michael Cohen.

She asked the potential jurors whether any would have a problem considering the “fact people change their stories and that might indicate that they’re lying?”

Trump, who is facing the jury box, leaned forward and whispered to his attorney Todd Blanche as Judge Juan Merchan interrupted Necheles to tell the jurors that they’ll ultimately make their own determination about the credibility of witnesses who will testify at trial.

Cohen is expected to testify in the trial. Here’s a reminder of his role in the case.

Trump's attorney is now questioning the potential jurors

It’s the defense’s turn to question the potential jurors, and Donald Trump attorney Susan Necheles is up.

Necheles, who also questioned prospective jurors yesterday, once again focused her line of questions on biases toward Trump.

“You all bring biases, and you particularly bring biases about someone who is as publicly and outspoken as President Trump. There’s nobody that doesn’t know him in this room,” she said.

Trump is watching Necheles speaks to the jury pool.

Prosecutor asks each potential juror if they'll be able to convict Trump if case is proven

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger is now going through the jurors one-by-one to ask each would be able to return a guilty verdict if the evidence proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Donald Trump is looking over at the jury box as they respond.

Hoffinger is also asking the potential jurors if they will return a verdict of not guilty if the evidence doesn’t prove the case — the question that Susan Necheles, Trump’s lawyer, asked prospective jurors yesterday.

Prospective jurors say they won't pre-judge witnesses

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger asked several jurors if they can promise not to pre-judge the witnesses in the trial.

“No pre-judgements,” said one prospective juror.

Another juror who is a lawyer also said she’d approach the case with no pre-judgments.

Potential jurors are being asked about Michael Cohen, and whether they can keep an open mind if he testifies

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger is now going through Michael Cohen’s background, asking the potential jurors whether they will keep an open mind to his testimony. She asked one juror if the fact that Cohen pleaded guilty wouldn’t stop the person from listening.

“That’s correct, I’ll keep listening,” the juror says.

Cohen is expected to testify in the trial. Here’s a reminder of his role in the case:

Another prospective alternate is excused after saying she couldn't serve and starting to cry

One potential alternate juror began crying when handed the microphone.

“I’m sorry. I thought I could do this. I wouldn’t want someone who feels this way to judge my case either,” she said.

She said, “(I) don’t want you to feel I’ve wasted anyone time. This is so much more stressful than I thought.”

Judge Juan Merchan invited her to come up to the bench to talk privately, after which she was excused.

There have been five excused alternate jurors today so far.

Trump leans back in chair and closes eyes at one point

As the prosecution questions the potential alternate jurors, Donald Trump is leaning back in his chair.

At one point, he closes his eyes.

He’s also looking over from time to time to the jurors as they respond.

Prosecution is now questioning potential jurors

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger is now questioning the remaining potential alternate jurors.

Hoffinger tells these prospective jurors, as the district attorney’s office has said to kick off voir dire each round:

“This is not about Mr. Trump being a former president, it’s not about his being a candidate for the presidency, it’s not about his popularity. And it’s not about who you’re going to vote for.”

“It’s only about whether the evidence proves he’s guilty” beyond a reasonable doubt with the crimes he’s been charged, she says.

Hoffinger is asking individual jurors whether they will base their decision in this case on the facts and the law. “In criminal cases, there’s a burden of proof and I don’t see why it should be any different in this case,” says one male juror.

Juror who revealed past conviction excused as judge thanks her for telling her story

Judge Juan Merchan brought the potential juror who revealed a past conviction back into the courtroom and said he spoke with the Commissioner of Jurors.

He said being a convicted felon does not automatically disqualify her from serving as a juror, but because she doesn’t have certain paperwork with her today, she has been excused.

He also commended her for telling her story in the courtroom: “What you just did is something that most people in this courtroom would not be able to do, so thank you.” As she was leaving she said, “Good luck.”

Alternates ensure a trial can continue if a seated juror cannot proceed. Here's when they may step in 

Attorneys have selected a jury of 12 New Yorkers — but now they need to seat as many as six alternates before opening statements can begin. One alternate was picked on Thursday.

Both sides know jury selection is one of the most important parts of the trial. These are the people who will hear the evidence and determine the historic outcome. Alternates ensure the trial can continue to the end if a seated juror cannot proceed.

New York criminal procedure law outlines several cases in which an alternate would replace a juror, and that juror would be dismissed, during a trial.

That includes:

  • If a juror gets sick “or other incapacity.”
  • The juror is not available to serve on the jury anymore.
  • If the court finds additional information or facts are revealed after jury selection that suggests the juror is “grossly unqualified” to be on the case.
  • If a juror does not show up to court.
  • The juror engaged in “misconduct of a substantial nature” — but not conduct that would warrant a mistrial.

The state law also says alternates must have the same qualifications and go through the same examination as other jurors. They will be questioned and chosen by the judge and the lawyers in this case after all 12 jurors are seated.

Alternates will listen to the entire trial, but won’t participate in deliberations.

Potential alternate allowed to go through questionnaire after revealing past conviction

A possible alternate juror was allowed to remain through the questionnaire process after revealing she had been convicted of a crime in another state.

Before the questionnaire process started, she told the judge she was convicted of a crime in another state and would be disqualified.

At one point, her voice cracked. Trump watched intently as she shared her story.

Judge Juan Merchan had her approach the bench so they could discuss it privately. He ultimately allowed her stay and she was not disqualified.

After the prospective jurors left the courtroom for the break, Merchan addressed the room, saying everyone inside “heard from a very brave woman who shared very personal things about her life. I know that wasn’t easy to do in a room full of strangers. I want to encourage the press, please be kind. Please be kind to this person.”

Remember: On Thursday, after a paneled juror expressed concerns in court about her ability to serve, the judge addressed the press in court, telling them “there’s a reason this is an anonymous jury” and to “refrain from writing about anything that has to do with physical descriptions.”

“We just lost what probably would’ve been a very good juror,” Merchan said. “The first thing she said was she was afraid and intimidating by the press.”

Court is taking a short break

Court is now in a 10-minute break.

Trump spends another morning in court after railing against the case as he entered

Donald Trump is spending his Friday morning seated at the defense table next to his lawyers in a chilly Manhattan Criminal Courthouse.

The former president has been seen reviewing documents and flipping through papers containing charts, photos or graphics. He’s whispered and passed notes between his lawyers, and at some points, he has remained hunched over with his elbows on the desk.

On several occasions, Trump has looked over at the jury box while potential alternate jurors answer questions about their ability to be impartial. Other times, the former president has stayed facing straight ahead as his defense team and prosecutors turn in their chairs to look at jurors.

On the way into court this morning, he took the opportunity to voice his displeasure with the proceedings. He stopped to tell reporters he should be on the campaign trail, not sitting in the courthouse for another day.

He also railed against a gag order that restricts him from making statements about witnesses, jurors, prosecutors and court staff, as well as family members of some of the key players. Prosecutors say he has violated that order at least seven more times in recent posts on social media.

Prospective jurors say what they do and where they get their news

Two people in a batch of 22 potential alternates read their answers to the questionnaire. Here’s what they said:

  • One prospective juror is a corporate lawyer who is married without children. Her husband is also a lawyer. She says she likes to hang out with friends, go to the gym, listen to music and watch TV. She’s not an avid news reader but says she is mostly on X, formerly known as Twitter, and listens to sports and entertainment podcasts.
  • Another is female, married and works for a clothing company and gets her news from Google.
  • A potential juror is a self-employed retail executive who grew up in Minnesota. She is married without kids and says she likes to travel, read and enjoy New York. She says she attended the women’s march and posted on her Instagram about it. She says she read The New York Times and Daily Mail, watches CNN and listens to podcasts about entrepreneurship and reality TV. She has Facebook and Instagram but does not post about politics on them. She says, “I believe everyone has to follow the law” when responding to the question, “Do you have any strong opinions or firmly held beliefs about whether a former president may be criminally charged in state court?”

Some lawyers have turned in their chairs to look at the jury pool while Trump remains seated forward

Jury questions are ongoing, and Donald Trump attorney Todd Blanche and the prosecutors have turned around in their chairs to look at the potential jurors.

Trump, meanwhile, is seated facing forward.

Here's how other potential jurors answered their questionnaires

More potential alternate jurors described their employment, some family members and what they do in their spare time:

  • One prospective alternate is a married program manager for a global medical technology firm with a degree in mechanical engineering. She teaches and practices yoga and does home renovations in her spare time. She’s been the victim of a few smaller crimes, including credit card fraud, a stolen car, and her house was broken into. In response to specific questions, she said she has a friend who is an intellectual property litigator and others who are felons.
  • Another prospective juror starts by saying that her father’s lifelong friend is former New Jersey Gov. and GOP presidential candidate Chris Christie. Judge Juan Merchan asks her if that would affect her ability to be fair and impartial. “I don’t believe so,” she says, prompting Merchan to ask if that was a figure of speech or if she’s unsure. It was just a figure of speech, she says. The prospective juror works in sales for a trading company. She likes to walk in Central Park, go to restaurants and enjoy New York City. She says she reads news from all sources through the Bloomberg terminal at her office. She used to listen The New York Times podcast “The Daily,” but says she stopped because it got “too depressing.” She notes that a relative of Michael Cohen works at her company but says she’s never worked with him. On the question of whether she has firmly held beliefs about Trump as a candidate that could interfere with her ability to be fair, she says, “I have opinions, but I don’t think it should interfere.”
  • Another juror works in insurance. “I try to find a wife in my spare time,” he joked. He said he has two close friends in local law enforcement and three family members who work in the New York state court system, including a court officer in the courtroom.

Jurors should make decisions solely based on evidence, a prospective juror says

Here’s how a few more potential alternate jurors described their jobs, hobbies and news consumption habits:

  • One prospective juror is a native New Yorker and retired high school teacher. He is a widower with an adult son, who is also a teacher. He likes cultural organizations including the New-York Historical Society, reads The New York Times every morning and also lists NPR, CNN and C-SPAN as media sources. He says he believes “that everyone should obey the law” and that jurors should “make our decisions solely on the evidence presented before us.”
  • Another alternate is a consultant, whose wife is a dentist. He listens to podcasts that summarize the news. He says he read Trump’s “The Art of the Deal” years ago.
  • A prospective juror started by noting that he worked in music and entertainment as a private equity fund manager and has a minority investment in a podcast company that he believed produced Michael Cohen’s “Mea Culpa” podcast. He says he wasn’t part of any decision-making and did not listen to the podcast, and that it would not be an issue for him to be fair and impartial. The prospective juror was raised in New Jersey and likes fitness, yoga, arts and culture. He reads The New York Times and says if the TV is on, he’ll watch MSNBC. He notes that he worked for get-out-the vote efforts for the Democratic Party and attended the women’s march and rally.

The former president talked to his attorney Todd Blanche after the latter juror said he was involved with voter efforts and attended the march.

Another potential juror has been excused after saying she can't be fair and impartial 

As questioning of potential alternates continues, another juror has been excused after saying she could not be fair and impartial.

Three potential jurors have been excused so far today, out of a panel of 22.

Here's what potential jurors are saying about their news habits

People in the group of possible alternate jurors continue to answer their questionnaires. Here’s a look at what some of them are saying about how they consume news:

  • One potential juror works for a global accounting firm. She lives with her significant other, who works in finance. Most consistently, she reads The New York Times, New York Post, Wall Street Journal and Fox News.
  • Another prospective juror is married with two children. She said she’s “not a big news person” but looks at The New York Times, Reuters and the BBC. She said she does have social media profiles, but she doesn’t post or use them.
  • One prospective juror originally from Europe said he doesn’t follow news as much as other people he knows, but he alternates between ABC, CBS, Fox News and the Wall Street Journal. He used to listen to NPR and Fox News radio and noted the two are “remarkably different.”
  • A prospective juror is a data analyst who has worked in the music industry and grew up in New Jersey. She is not married, lives with her dog and likes to cook, bake, go to theater and watch hockey. She occasionally reads the New York Times and Washington Post and listens to NPR, but notes she keeps her news consumption limited to certain times of the day. She also listens to cooking and science podcasts. She says she observes Passover, and asked Judge Juan Merchan about the schedule. She said she can get to her Seder in time Monday and Tuesday if court ends at 2 p.m. ET.

Trump is looking at papers and speaking with attorney

Donald Trump is looking at the papers in front of him and whispering with his attorney Todd Blanche as the potential jurors are going through the questionnaire. Blanche showed him something on a paper in front of him.

Potential alternates say they think Trump is being treated "fairly" in the case

As the search for more alternates continues, a group of potential jurors is being questioned in court about their background and beliefs about former President Donald Trump.

When asked if they have any feelings or opinions about how Trump is being treated in this case, some of the potential jurors said they believe he is being treated “fairly.”

  • One prospective juror is a native New Yorker and an executive chef who has been in the restaurant industry for 20 years. He is married and likes to watch TV and run. He says he does not read news outlets but watches “mostly YouTube.” He says he will be fair and impartial as a juror, and believes Trump is “being treated fairly” in this case.
  • Another prospective juror is a native New Yorker. He works in IT and his wife is a karate instructor. He is “big” into martial arts and listens to podcasts on the topic. When asked if he has any feelings or opinions about how Trump is being treated in the case, he responded, “fairly.”

Meanwhile another prospective juror, a woman who said she is a lawyer, told the court she may have read Trump’s book “The Art of the Deal” when she was younger, but she can’t be sure. She has multiple degrees: a law degree, master’s degree and bachelor’s degree. She used to be an amateur boxer but gave that up because she got too many black eyes, now her hobbies include watching TV on the couch. She said she browses headlines. Her father is a court officer.

Another potential juror excused

Another prospective juror was excused after saying that “after some introspection,” she does not think she can be impartial.

“I want to be, and I have every intention when I first started, but I think after the questions posed to prospective jurors, in asking those questions to myself, I don’t think I can be impartial,” she says.

Trump looking at jury box during questioning

Donald Trump is looking over at the jury box while potential jurors answer questions.

Potential juror says she doesn't have any "strong opinions" about Trump

One prospective juror is a woman originally from Spain who is not currently working and is married with adult children.

She likes to travel and says she does not follow the news and does not have any social media accounts. She says she’s “very fortunate in life” not to have health issues.

“I don’t have strong opinions about former President Donald Trump that would interfere” with the ability to be a fair and impartial juror, she says.

Trump whispering with attorneys during jury questioning

Donald Trump is sitting, facing straight ahead during this round of jury questions.

At one point, defense attorney Todd Blanche passed Trump a note. Trump then flicked it over to attorney Emil Bove, who put it in the inside the pocket of his suit jacket.

Trump then whispered with those two attorneys.

Prospective juror is excused after saying she doesn't think she "can be completely here and fair"

A prospective juror has been excused this morning after she said she has really bad anxiety and doesn’t think she “can be completely here and fair.”

She told the judge she is concerned that as the trial goes on and the more people know she is part of the jury, “I might not be able to be completely fair and not emotional so that concerns me.”

Questioning underway for potential jurors

The 22 prospective jurors have entered the courtroom for questioning.

Judge Juan Merchan thanked them for being on time.

Judge agrees to give attorneys an extra 5 minutes to question prospective jurors

Prosecutors and former President Donald Trump’s attorneys will each get 25 minutes to question the 22 prospective jurors, after the prosecution asked for an extra 5 minutes because there are more than 18 jurors today.

Judge says they are still working on the temperature in the courtroom

Judge Juan Merchan said they are working on the temperature situation in the courtroom after Donald Trump yesterday quipped about how chilly it is.

“We’re also still working on the temperature in the courtroom,” Merchan said at the start of court today.

Court is in session

The court is in session. A panel of 12 jurors and one alternate have already been chosen. More alternates will be selected today as the judge indicated he wants about six alternates.

Here’s what is expected to happen in court:

  • 22 potential jurors from the most recent panel are expected to return to the courtroom to answer their questionnaires.
  • From there, the voir dire process will take place yet again with an address and questioning of prospective jurors by the prosecution and defense, about 30 minutes for each side.
  • Each side has two peremptory strikes per alternate and those strikes do not carry over. These strikes allow both sides to remove a potential alternate without cause.
  • Another panel of 96 potential jurors will be called at approximately 11:30 a.m. ET if they don’t get enough alternates from this group. This group was sworn in yesterday.
  • The judge also indicated the anticipated Sandoval hearing may be today if they get through alternate selection. That routine hearing will address Trump’s criminal history and assess how much prosecutors can ask if a defendant testifies.

Judge Merchan inside courtroom

Judge Juan Merchan is now inside the courtroom as well.

He says 22 potential jurors are in the building and ready to go.

Trump is inside the courtroom

Former President Donald Trump entered the Manhattan courtroom and is sitting at the defense table.

Trump lawyer Gedalia Stern also entered the room.

Prosecutors are entering the courtroom

The prosecution team is now entering the courtroom for the fourth day of Donald Trump’s criminal trial.

Prosecutors allege Trump violated a gag order 7 more times

Prosecutors in Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial accused the former president of violating a gag order seven more times Thursday and urged the court to find him in contempt. 

Prosecutors filed their argument Thursday in addition to another filing earlier this week, which accused Trump of violating the gag order on three other previous occasions. The documents were submitted to support arguments made orally in court earlier Thursday.

The DA’s office claims Trump continued to violate the gag order in several online posts to his Truth Social account and also in articles posted on Trump’s official campaign website. The posts appear to attack Trump’s former fixer Michael Cohen, a key witness in the case who is expected to testify. 

In the filing, prosecutor Chris Conroy asks the judge to hold Trump in contempt for violating the gag order and sanction Trump $1,000 for each alleged violation which prohibits him from talking about witnesses in the case, the DA’s office or court staff.

Conroy wrote in the Thursday filing, “Defendant’s decision to specifically target individuals whom this Court’s order protects is a deliberate flouting of this Court’s directives.”

Judge Juan Merchan will decide on the request at a hearing he had already scheduled for next Tuesday, April 23, regarding three other gag order violation allegations that had already been raised by prosecutors.

This isn’t the first time Trump has been scrutinized for his social media posts. He was fined twice for violating a gag order imposed by New York Judge Arthur Engoron in his civil fraud trial.

Trump slams trial as he tells reporters he should be campaigning instead of sitting in a courtroom 

Former President Donald Trump railed against the hush money case and Judge Juan Merchan before entering the Manhattan courtroom for day four of his hush money trial.

“New York is going down as a very corrupt place to do business,” Trump told reporters.

Trump said he should be campaigning in Pennsylvania and other states instead of being in the courtroom.

“I am sitting in a courthouse all day long,” the former president said, as he called the situation “unfair.”

Trump also said the gag order “has to come off,” telling reporters that he “should be allowed to speak.”

Trump has been using the trial and his many legal challenges to boost his campaign and fundraising.

Trump's motorcade arrives at the courthouse

Donald Trump’s motorcade has arrived at the courthouse where the former president is expected to attend a fourth day of jury selection, as lawyers work to pick more alternates after a jury of 12 and one alternate were selected.

Trump usually speaks to media ahead of court proceedings, which typically get underway at 9:30 a.m. ET.

District attorney's office won’t tell Trump which witnesses they will call first

As day three concluded in Donald Trump’s hush money business fraud case, the former president’s attorney Todd Blanche asked the district attorney’s office to share the first three witnesses they plan to call, noting that opening statements and the first witness testimony could begin as soon as Monday.

The district attorney’s office refused. Assistant District Attorney Josh Steinglass acknowledged that courtesy is often extended. But because Trump has been posting on social media about their witnesses, he said with a shrug, “We’re not telling him who the witnesses are.”

Judge Juan Merchan said he couldn’t fault prosecutors for that. Trump visibly shook his head over the exchange. Blanche then proposed that he would assure the district attorney’s office that Trump would not post about the witnesses if they shared their witness list.

“I don’t think you can make that representation,” Merchan responded.

Blanche continued to protest, but Merchan said he would not order them to turn over their witnesses. “They’re not required to,” he said.

Why this matters: The tactic from the district attorney’s office means that not only will Trump’s team be in the dark about upcoming witnesses, the DA’s office could also choose to keep the identities of witnesses in the wings from the public, too – meaning it’s possible witnesses become a surprise on a daily basis.

What we know about the 12-person jury that was seated yesterday 

A full 12-person jury has been selected for Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial. The panel is comprised of seven men and five women. One alternate, a woman, was also selected.

Here’s what to know about the jurors:

Juror 1 - Foreperson

  • Works in sales and has some college education
  • Originally from Ireland
  • Married with no children
  • Gets news from The New York Times, Daily Mail and sometimes Fox News and MSNBC

Juror 2

  • Investment banker with a master’s degree
  • Lives with wife and doesn’t have children
  • Follows Trump’s TruthSocial posts and Michael Cohen on X
  • Seen quotes from Trump’s book “Trump: The Art of The Deal”

Juror 3

  • Corporate lawyer
  • Originally from Oregon
  • Not married and doesn’t have children
  • Gets news from The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Google

Juror 4

  • Security engineer
  • Married with three children
  • Has a high school diploma
  • Doesn’t have social media

Keep reading about the other selected jurors.

Here's how Trump's first criminal trial will work

Former President Donald Trump’s first criminal trial is expected to take six to eight weeks from start to finish.

This trial, related to a hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels in 2016, is the first of four ongoing criminal cases that are expected to head to trial for the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee.

Read more about the stages of the case, and what they mean here.

Trump is on his way to court

Former President Donald Trump’s motorcade is en route to the Manhattan courthouse where jury selection will continue for his hush money criminal trial. 

Here's what is expected to happen in court today as the search for the remaining alternates continues

Another busy day of court activity is ahead in former President Donald Trump’s historic hush money criminal trial. Catch up on what is expected to unfold in court Friday:

  • There are 22 prospective jurors who have yet to go through the questionnaire process from the second panel. Judge Juan Merchan will begin with them to try to fill out a slate of five additional alternate jurors, although the judge noted he may change that number.
  • Donald Trump’s attorneys and the district attorney’s office also will get additional peremptory challenges for the alternate jurors. Neither used a challenge for the first alternate chosen on Thursday.
  • If jury selection wraps up quickly enough Friday, Merchan said he will hold what’s called a Sandoval hearing Friday afternoon, where they will discuss what in Trump’s legal history can be used to try to impeach him if he chooses to testify.
  • Prosecutors say in filings they’ll ask the former president about the recent verdicts against him, including the recent civil fraud trial and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case.
  • But if a sufficient number of alternates cannot be chosen out of the 22, Merchan has teed up an additional panel of 96 jurors, who were sworn in Thursday and told to return on Friday – that’s likely the final pool of people who will make up the Trump hush money trial jury.

Here’s what happened yesterday in day 3 of the trial.

The key players in the New York hush money case

Former President Donald Trump was first indicted in March 2023 by the Manhattan district attorney on state charges related to a hush money payment to an adult film star in 2016.

As the trial begins, catch up on the key people in the case below:

Here's a look at the topics of the questions prospective alternate jurors could be asked

Judge Juan Merchan last week released the questionnaire that is being presented to potential jurors in court. It contains multiple questions that could signal political views to the lawyers on both sides.

A panel of 12 New Yorkers and six alternates need to be seated to decide whether to convict Donald Trump. The 12-person jury and one alternate are empaneled so far.

Here’s a look at some of the topics of the questions:

  • News consumption
  • Affiliations with groups like the Proud Boys, QAnon and Antifa.
  • Whether prospective jurors or anyone in their circle attended a Trump rally or an anti-Trump event.
  • If they’ve ever read books or listened to podcasts from Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and a key witness for the district attorney, or if they’ve read any of Trump’s own books.

Those in the jury pool will also be asked if they have views on whether a former president can be charged in state court and how Trump is being treated in this case.

The questions are being used for the judge to strike jurors at the outset, if they don’t believe they can render a verdict fairly. They are also being used by lawyers for both sides to strike jurors for any reason — a key part of the jury selection process.

Catch up on what happened in court on the 3rd day of Trump’s hush money trial

A jury of 12 New Yorkers was seated in former President Donald Trump’s historic hush money trial in Manhattan. It comes after two empaneled jurors were dismissed Thursday morning and seven new jurors were chosen by the afternoon.

The jury is made up of seven men and five women.

Now, the court is working to pick up to six alternates. One has been seated so far. Judge Juan Merchan said he is hopeful the process will be finished on Friday.

Here’s what to know to get up to speed:

Seated jurors dismissed:

  • One juror was dismissed after expressing concerns that part of her identity was made public by the media. The judge then ruled the media cannot publish jurors’ answers to questions about their current or former employers.
  • A second empaneled juror was excused after prosecutors questioned the truthfulness of the answers he gave to questions from attorneys on Tuesday.

Lawyers continue their questioning:

  • The day started with a panel of 96 potential jurors. That was narrowed down to 38 after half were quickly dismissed for saying they could not be fair or impartial and another nine were dismissed because of another conflict. An additional prospective juror was dismissed after answering the questionnaire.
  • 18 jurors then faced additional questioning from lawyers in the jury box.
  • Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass started by asking them if they feel that prosecutors have more to prove “because the defendant is Donald Trump?” He also asked the potential jurors to look at Trump and ensure they can look him in the eye and say “guilty” if their case is proven. 
  • Trump attorney Susan Necheles asked whether anyone has a problem with the notion that if “two witnesses get on this witness stand and say, under oath, two diametrically opposed things,” that somebody is lying. She also asked one potential juror directly about whether she posted on social media about Trump.

Jurors excused for cause:

  • Once lawyers were done with their questioning, each side brought up challenges to get some potential jurors dismissed for cause — and not have to use their peremptory strikes.
  • The judge dismissed two potential jurors for cause. One admitted she did not think she could be fair and another had negative social media posts about Trump.
  • The judge denied a request to dismiss a potential juror who said she knew Necheles.
  • Both the prosecution and the defense used all of their peremptory strikes.

Trump in court: The former president turned his chair and faced the jury box while lawyers asked questions. He craned his neck to look at the jury pool as several prospective jurors said they disagreed with Trump’s policies or generally disliked him.

Friday: Merchan swore in a new panel of potential jurors who will return on Friday when the selection of alternates will continue.

Gag order: Meanwhile, prosecutors say Trump violated his gag order seven more times, pointing to posts online and calling the situation “ridiculous.” The order was issued to stop Trump from making statements about witnesses, jurors, prosecutors, court staff, or the family members of prosecutors and court staff in late March. Merchan will have a hearing about the matter next Tuesday.

Trump’s lawyers request judge limits instructions on Access Hollywood tape and anticipated witness testimony

Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers have issued two pre-motion letters in the hush money criminal trial asking Judge Juan Merchan to limit his instructions to the jury to advise they cannot infer from the admissions of others that Trump is guilty.

In one pre-motion letter, Trump’s lawyers on Wednesday requested a limiting instruction over anticipated testimony from Trump’s former fixer Michael Cohen regarding his guilty plea for breaking campaign finance laws.

Trump’s lawyers said they would like the judge to instruct the jury by saying, “Mr. Cohen’s guilty plea is not evidence of the defendant’s guilt, and you may not consider it in determining whether the People have proven any of the elements of the charges.”

Cohen’s credibility is expected to be one of the biggest issues for the jury in this case. Trump’s attorneys are planning to try to discredit Cohen, who is a central witness for the prosecution.

The pre-motion letter requests a similar limiting instruction over anticipated testimony from the-then chairman of American Media Inc., David Pecker, who allegedly helped broker the deal with Stormy Daniels. Pecker has been granted immunity in exchange for his testimony and AMI signed a non-prosecution agreement with prosecutors.

A second pre-motion letter Wednesday requested further argument regarding the admissibility of the contents of the so-called Access Hollywood tape. Trump is asking that it either be precluded or that the judge reserve his ruling on its admissibility until after Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal testify.

A full jury was set for Trump's hush money case on Thursday

The full 12-person jury for Donald Trump’s hush money criminal trial was seated Thursday, with Judge Juan Merchan overseeing a productive afternoon despite starting the day with two previously empaneled jurors getting dismissed.

Here’s a recap of what happened yesterday:

  • We started the day with seven seated jurors with the goal of empaneling 12 jurors overall and likely six alternates.
  • Instead, the process moved backward, with one seated juror excused over concerns that her identity was being shared publicly, and another dismissed after the prosecution raised questions about the truthfulness of his answers to screening questions (the judge did not publicly specify why the juror was excused).
  • But the court made up ground, whittling down a batch of 96 potential jurors through questions about scheduling conflicts and the potential jurors’ ability to impartially judge the case. In the end, seven new jurors were selected.
  • Each side raised flags about potential jury members, requesting their dismissal without cause. Prosecutors and Trump’s attorneys started jury selection with 10 strikes, and used all the ones they had remaining in the process of filling the jury.
  • Each side also had the ability to request a juror be dismissed for cause, which would not expend one of their limited strikes but required the approval of Merchan. At least one potential jury member was dismissed for cause at the request of Trump’s team.

One alternate was also chosen.