Even though a United Nations Security Council resolution put forth by the United States calling for a ceasefire in Gaza was vetoed on Friday, analysts said it was a major departure from US policy on Israel during the war.
The draft resolution called for “an immediate and sustained ceasefire… in connection with the release of all remaining hostages,” and comes after Washington vetoed three prior UN resolutions calling for a ceasefire.
The resolution included phrasing that the US was unwilling to use before, according to Frank Lowenstein — who worked as special envoy for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations under US President Barack Obama during the 2014 Israel-Gaza war — referring to “immediate ceasefire,” which the former diplomat said could help bring the US back from months of international “isolation.”
But Lowenstein says Russia's veto "was a blatant effort ... (to) keep the US isolated despite the fact that the resolution is in line with the vast majority of the Security Council. They are playing politics with the ceasefire, clearly putting their desire to isolate the US internationally ahead of the interests of the Palestinians in Gaza who desperately need a ceasefire.”
The US, Israel’s most prominent defender on the world stage, has faced severe criticism in Arab countries and in Europe for its refusal to call for a ceasefire early in the Gaza war as well as its reluctance to translate its verbal criticism of Israel’s conduct to diplomatic action.
“I think there has been a gap from day one, a gap between the language and the actions,” said Yossi Mekelberg, an associate fellow with the Middle East and North Africa program at the Chatham House think tank in London. “But I think gradually, the language and the action are coming closer, closing the gap, millimeter by millimeter.”