There’s a familiar country atop the medal count in the Winter Olympics: Norway. This might surprise some given that Norway has only a little more than five million residents — not even in the top 100 most populated countries.
So what’s the secret to Norway’s historical and current success? Two big factors really.
The first is, perhaps obviously, the weather. It’s the Winter Olympics after all. Norway ranks in the bottom five in World Bank data for average temperature during the year at about 36 degrees Fahrenheit (two degrees Celsius) — brrr 🥶.
When you take a look at a medal count and temperature chart (as in this Economist article), you’ll see a clear correlation between the two.
But it’s more than temperature — it is also money.
Think about how hard it is to train for the Olympics. Gear is often expensive. Children often need fortunate enough parents to get them to events. There also needs to be infrastructure in place to train for the Olympics.
Norway is a fairly wealthy country: its GDP is in the top 35 worldwide and the GDP per capita is in the top 10.
GDP though doesn’t capture all types of wealth. That’s what the United Nations Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index is for; it takes into account other variables such as education, life expectancy and inequality.
A country where knowledge can be transferred and where more of the country has access to the funds necessary to compete would in theory supply a broader array of athletes. This was something that was noted originally in "Soccernomics" by Simon Kuper and Stefan Szymanski.
You know where Norway is on the Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index? Number one.
It shouldn’t be too surprising, therefore, that a wealthy country — where it is cold — dominates the Winter Games.