Trump's attorney is highlighting minor inconsistencies in Pecker's past statements

Day 8 of Trump New York hush money trial

By CNN's Kara Scannell, Lauren Del Valle and Jeremy Herb in the courthouse

Updated 6:31 p.m. ET, April 26, 2024
67 Posts
Sort byDropdown arrow
12:14 p.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Trump's attorney is highlighting minor inconsistencies in Pecker's past statements

Bove is focusing on a portion of the statement of facts in a non-prosecution agreement Pecker reached with federal investigators in 2018.

It relates to an August 2015 meeting at Trump Tower.

Bove is asking Pecker about his statements about that meeting during his October 2019 interview with the district attorney's office.

He asks Pecker whether he recalls that his lawyer said at the 2019 meeting that a section of the statement of facts, paragraph three, was "wrong and inaccurate." Pecker says he does not recall this.

Trump is leaning forward and staring at the screen as Pecker reviews the record from the October 2019 meeting.

"I think that may be inaccurate. I think that came up with the feds. I have never heard Pecker say that," is captured in notes from the meeting, which Bove read aloud.

Pecker says there was a dispute over a single word: "Selling and purchasing is the same thing. Someone has to buy them."

Key context: The defense is working to poke holes in Pecker's claims and raise doubt about his recollection of events regarding the National Enquirer's relationship with Trump, as he is serving as a key witness for the prosecution.

Bove has spent much of the cross-examination trying to dismantle Pecker's credibility, highlighting small inconsistencies in Pecker's statements to prosecutors over the years in comparison to his trial testimony.

12:04 p.m. ET, April 26, 2024

The jury has been following the back-and-forth between Trump attorney and Pecker

The jury has been paying attention as Bove continues to cross-examine Pecker.

Their eyes have followed the back-and-forth between of them.

Remember: The jury is comprised of 12 jurors and six alternate jurors. Read about them here.

12:47 p.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Here's what the defense has focused on so far in its cross-examination of David Pecker

From CNN's Kara Scannell, Lauren del Valle, Jeremy Herb

Donald Trump's attorneys cross-examined David Pecker on Friday morning, poking holes at the veracity of his comments and pointing out a discrepancy between Pecker's 2018 FBI testimony and his testimony in court this week.

Most of the questions centered around American Media Inc.'s business interests, beginning on the topic of running negative articles about Trump's foes, including the Clintons and Ben Carson. The defense was trying to establish that Pecker’s actions were made in line with the company's bottom line in mind.

Here are some of the key points from the cross examination of Pecker:

  • Pecker acknowledged that negative press for Trump's foes was generally good for business. Defense attorney Emil Bove elicited from Pecker that he would have run negative information about Carson even without a conversation from Trump, and that source agreements like the ones used for Karen McDougal and doorman Dino Sajudin were made all the time outside of the Trump sphere.
  • Pecker said that if the false doorman allegations were true, he would have run it. The defense tried to establish it was good for business for Pecker to get the rights to the story first. Pecker also testified that there was a legitimate business purpose to the agreement between AMI and McDougal.
  • Bove elicited from Pecker that “catch and kill” was not discussed at the August 2015 meeting. The meeting has become central to this case and during it, Pecker agreed to be the “eyes and ears” for Trump’s campaign and flag any negative stories to Cohen.
  • Defense pointed out discrepancy between Pecker's testimony this week and 2018 FBI interview. Pecker testified this week that Trump thanked him for handling McDougal and Sajudin’s stories during a January 2017 meeting at Trump Tower. But the defense pointed out that "Trump did not express any gratitude to Pecker and AMI" during his 2018 FBI interview. Pecker confirmed the FBI notes were inconsistent with his testimony. Bove also pointed out an error in Pecker’s testimony where he mistook the year he saw a third party agreement relating to the McDougal deal.
  • Defense elicited from Pecker that he wanted nothing to do with the Stormy Daniels allegations. Pecker testified his "main concern" about her not having been paid was the harm it could do to National Enquirer editor Dylan Howard's reputation.
  • Defense made sure to spell out for the jurors that the McDougal deal was reviewed by an election law attorney. The defense made clear that Pecker believed there would be no legal ramifications.

CNN's Kristina Sgueglia contributed reporting to this post.

12:04 p.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Pecker confirms federal investigation put some pressure on negotiations related to sale of tabloids

Pecker confirmed there was a provision related to the federal investigations in a deal with Hudson News Group regarding the sale of the National Enquirer and two other tabloids.

The investigations had to be resolved before the deal could be finalized, he confirmed. The proposed deal was worth $100 million.

Bove asked whether the federal investigation "put some pressure on the negotiations."

Pecker paused before answering. "From a timing standpoint, it would have added onto the stress of the transaction," Pecker said.

"If AMI had been indicted that would have affected the value of its assets," Bove asked while emphasizing "indicted." Pecker agreed.

Bove asked Pecker whether there was a "price pressure" on the agreement. "To Hudson News, the federal investigation was going to reduce the earnings of those magazines," Pecker said.

11:53 a.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Pecker says meetings with FBI agents were stressful

Bove again confirms with Pecker that American Media Inc. entered into a non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors.

Bove asks Pecker whether the meetings with FBI agents were stressful.

"You wanted it over with though, right?" he asks.

"Uh, yes," Pecker says.

11:40 a.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Pecker recounts FBI agents coming to his house in 2018

Bove is asking Pecker about the time FBI agents came to his home in 2018.

Three agents arrived around 8 a.m. and took Pecker's phone with a search warrant, but did not search his house, the former tabloid boss testifies.

11:36 a.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Bove resumes his cross examination

Bove is resuming his cross examination of Pecker.

11:35 a.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Judge is back on the bench

Judge Juan Merchan is back on the bench. Pecker is returning to the courtroom.

Trump is chatting with Bove before we begin. Trump is seated between Bove and attorney Susan Necheles. Attorney Todd Blanche is the farthest away from him now.

Pecker is smiling in the direction of the defense table.

11:33 a.m. ET, April 26, 2024

Here's a timeline of key events in the hush money case

From CNN’s Lauren del Valle, Kara Scannell, Annette Choi and Gillian Roberts 

Prosecutors and the defense have been zeroing in on key moments related to the hush money case.

CNN compiled a timeline of the events leading up to the historic trial. Read up on the moments below:

  • September 2016: Donald Trump discusses a $150,000 hush money payment understood to be for former Playboy model Karen McDougal with Michael Cohen who secretly records the conversation. McDougal has alleged she had an extramarital affair with Trump beginning in 2006, which he has denied. 
  • October 7, 2016: The Washington Post releases an "Access Hollywood" video from 2005 in which Trump uses vulgar language to describe his sexual approach to women with show host Billy Bush. 
  • October 27, 2016: According to prosecutors, Cohen pays Stormy Daniels $130,000 through her attorney via a shell company in exchange for her silence about an affair she allegedly had with Trump in 2006. This $130,000 sum is separate from the $150,000 paid to McDougal. Trump has publicly denied having any affairs and has denied making the payments. 
  • November 8, 2016: Trump secures the election to become the 45th President of the United States. 
  • February 2017: Prosecutors say Cohen meets with Trump in the Oval Office to confirm how he would be reimbursed for the hush money payment Cohen fronted to Daniels. Under the plan, Cohen would send a series of false invoices requesting payment for legal services he performed pursuant to a retainer agreement and receive monthly checks for $35,000 for a total of $420,000 to cover the payment, his taxes and a bonus, prosecutors alleged. Prosecutors also allege there was never a retainer agreement. 
  • January 2018: The Wall Street Journal breaks news about the hush money payment Cohen made to Daniels in 2016. 

See the full timeline.