Sheeran went to court for copyright infringement of 'Let's Get it On'. Listen to them side by side
2:32
What we covered here
A Manhattan jury found Ed Sheeran’s hit “Thinking Out Loud” did not infringe on the copyright of the classic Marvin Gaye song “Let’s Get It On.”
The jury determined that Sheeran did not wrongfully copy compositional elements or melodies from “Let’s Get It On.”
The jury received the case late Wednesday afternoon and deliberated for approximately three hours.
12 Posts
Link Copied!
We’ve wrapped up our live coverage. You can read more about the case here, or scroll through the posts below for a recap.
Link Copied!
"Thinking Out Loud" co-writer says verdict has big implications for next generation of musicians
Ed Sheeran (L) and Amy Wadge accept award for Best Pop Solo Performance for 'Thinking Out Loud' onstage during The 58th Grammy Awards at Staples Center on February 15, 2016 in Los Angeles, California.
(Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)
When a jury determined that Ed Sheeran’s hit “Thinking Out Loud” did not infringe on the copyright of the classic Marvin Gaye song “Let’s Get It On,” it felt like a weight was lifted off Amy Wadge’s shoulders.
Wadge is the co-writer of “Thinking Out Loud,” one of her first big hits.
“It was just the most unbelievable relief and like seven years of stress just leaving my body,” she told CNN after the verdict was read Thursday, adding that she and Sheeran “had a few tears.”
Wadge said the jury’s decision in the copyright case has implications beyond “Thinking Out Loud.” She said it’s important for the next generation of musicians to know that they can still be creative.
“I think it even goes beyond music and the idea that it just comes down to the building blocks of anything — if it was a painting or a film — and for a musician who has just relied upon very little musical knowledge for my whole career, it was terrifying to even contemplate that this could even happen,” she said.
The plaintiffs had alleged similarities between the chord progression, harmonic rhythm, and certain melodies in the two songs. Sheeran’s legal team had argued that the melodies are different and the elements used in both songs are common in pop music.
Wadge said “knowing that we did nothing wrong and all the speculation that goes with it” took an emotional toll on her, but the songwriter thanked fans and everyone who supported her and Sheeran for “believing the truth.”
“Because that’s what it was, the truth,” Wadge said.
CNN’s Chloe Melas contributed to his post.
Link Copied!
Juror in Ed Sheeran trial said decision was reached after “a lot of back and forth”
From CNN's Laura Dolan
A female juror in the Ed Sheeran copyright infringement trial called it “a very interesting case” and said both sides “did a really great job.”
Neis said there were seven jurors with differing opinions, initially.
Neis added, “There was a lot of back and forth and we all wanted to make sure we were very comfortable with the decision.”
A key factor in the jury’s decision, according to Neis, was Sheeran’s performance of the song at the trial.
Neis said the testimony from both expert witnesses was also a helpful factor in the jury’s decision, as was the copyrighted sheet music to “Lets Get it On.”
Link Copied!
Ed Sheeran opens up about the emotional toll of the trial
Ed Sheeran leaves Manhattan Federal Court and speaks to media after he was found not guilty in a music copyright trial on May 4, in New York City.
(Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images)
Musician Ed Sheeran delved into the emotional toll of the trial, explaining that because he had to be in New York, it meant missing being with his family for his grandmother’s funeral in Ireland.
“I will never get that time back,” he said.
“I am just a guy with a guitar who loves writing music for people to enjoy,” he said. “I am not and will never allow myself to be a piggy bank for anyone to shake.”
He said like other artists he works hard to create songs “based around real-life personal experience.”
“It is devastating to be accused of stealing someone else’s song when we put so much work into our livelihoods.”
Link Copied!
Sheeran hugged and spoke at length with one of the plaintiffs after jury's verdict
From CNN’s Nicki Brown
Musician Ed Sheeran and Kathryn Townsend Griffin, a plaintiff in his copyright infringement case, embraced and spoke at length after learning of the jury’s verdict.
The jury found Sheeran’s “Thinking Out Loud” did not wrongfully copy the Marvin Gaye classic “Let’s Get It On,” which was co-written by Ed Townsend — Griffin’s father.
Griffin said she respects the jury’s decision.
“I stood up for my father’s intellectual property,” she said. “This was never about money — it was only principles.”
Link Copied!
Sheeran said he is "unbelievably frustrated" at "bogus claims" made in copyright lawsuit
Singer Ed Sheeran said he is happy with the outcome of the case, but said he is “unbelievably frustrated that baseless claims like this are allowed to go to court at all.”
The artist said it is important for musicians to be able to have creative freedom without the fear of being accused of stealing other songs.
He said in this case his team proved that the chords in question from Marvin Gaye’s classic “Let’s Get It On” were used in songs before it was written “and will be used to make music long after we are all gone.”
The plaintiffs had alleged similarities between the chord progression, harmonic rhythm, and certain melodies in “Let’s Get It On” and Sheeran’s hit “Thinking Out Loud.”
Sheeran said these were “misleading comparisons” and said he was glad the jury saw through the “bogus claim.”
Link Copied!
Listen for yourself: Here are the 2 songs at the center of Ed Sheeran's copyright case
Ed Sheeran (left) performs on stage during the 37th Annual Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony at Microsoft Theater on November 5, 2022 in Los Angeles, California. Marvin Gaye (right) performs on opening night at Radio City Music Hall in New York, on May 17, 1983.
(Getty Images/AP)
Basic similarities or a copy-cat act? When it came to Ed Sheeran’s hit “Thinking Out Loud” and the classic Marvin Gaye song “Let’s Get It On,” a jury was asked to weigh two conflicting narratives.
The plaintiffs alleged similarities between the chord progression, harmonic rhythm and certain melodies in the two songs.
Sheeran’s legal team argued that the melodies are different and the elements used in both songs are common in pop music.
Ultimately, the jury concluded Sheeran had independently created “Thinking Out Loud” and did not infringe on the copyright of Gaye’s song.
Listen to back-to-back snippets from the two songs in the video below:
CNN’s Lauren del Valle contributed to this report.
Link Copied!
Jury finds Ed Sheeran did not infringe on the copyright of "Let's Get It On"
From CNN’s Lauren del Valle and Kara Scannell
Ed Sheeran leaves court in New York, on April 25.
(Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg/Getty Images)
A Manhattan jury found Ed Sheeran’s hit “Thinking Out Loud” did not infringe on the copyright of the classic Marvin Gaye song “Let’s Get It On.”
The jury determined that Sheeran had independently created his song and did not wrongfully copy compositional elements or melodies from Gaye’s song.
Upon hearing the verdict, Sheeran hugged his attorneys.
The plaintiffs had alleged similarities between the chord progression, harmonic rhythm and certain melodies in the two songs. Sheeran’s legal team had argued that the melodies are different and the elements used in both songs are common in pop music.
CNN’s Sabrina Souza contributed to this report.
Link Copied!
Jury reaches a verdict in Ed Sheeran copyright infringement case
From CNN’s Lauren del Valle
The jury has reached a verdict in the copyright infringement trial about whether Ed Sheeran’s smash single “Thinking Out Loud” copied the classic Marvin Gaye song “Let’s Get It On.”
The jury received the case late Wednesday afternoon and deliberated for approximately three hours.
If the jury decides Sheeran is liable for copyright infringement, the trial will move onto the second phase to determine damages.
The family of Ed Townsend, who co-wrote “Let’s Get It On” with Gaye has accused Sheeran of copying the 1973 hit.
The plaintiffs had alleged similarities between the chord progression, harmonic rhythm, and certain melodies in the two songs. Sheeran’s legal team had argued that the melodies are different and the elements used in both songs are common in pop music.
Link Copied!
Other famous music copyright cases
Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke perform in 2014.
(Larry Busacca/Getty Images)
The copyright lawsuit against Ed Sheeran over his song “Thinking Out Loud” is not unprecedented. Similar lawsuits have become increasingly common in the music industry over the past few years, though the outcomes have been mixed.
Marvin Gaye’s family has previously sued other artists for copyright infringement—and won. The estate successfully sued singer Robin Thicke and producer Pharrell Williams for $7.4 million in 2015 for borrowing from Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up” for their hit “Blurred Lines,” though the case turned into a five-year legal battle that ultimately saw the judgment reduced to $5.3 million. The ruling also awarded Gaye’s family 50% percent of the royalties from “Blurred Lines” moving forward.
But other, recent copyright cases have had different outcomes.
Taylor Swift faced a similar case in 2017 over her smash hit “Shake It Off,” which was settled and dismissed last year. Led Zeppelin was sued in 2014 over its iconic tune “Stairway to Heaven” by the estate of late Randy California, former lead guitarist of the 1960s band Spirit, for lifting part of their single “Taurus.” A 2020 appeals court ruled in Led Zeppelin’s favor.
In a 2022 case over his song “Shape of You,” a judge ruled in Sheeran’s favor that he did not copy grime artist Sami Switch’s song “Oh Why” after the musician accused Sheeran of plagiarizing a key part. He was also sued in 2016 over his single “Photograph,” which was settled out of court.
Link Copied!
Here's what you need to know about the case
Kathryn Townsend Griffin, daughter of singer and songwriter Ed Townsend, arrives to New York Federal Court as proceedings continue in a copyright infringement trial against singer Ed Sheeran on Thursday, May 4.
(John Minchillo/AP)
The trial concerns Sheeran’s song “Thinking Out Loud,” which won the 2016 Grammy award for song of the year.
The family of Ed Townsend, who co-wrote “Let’s Get It On” with Gaye, has accused Ed Sheeran of copying the 1973 hit.
The plaintiffs have alleged similarities between the chord progression, harmonic rhythm, and certain melodies in the two songs. Sheeran’s legal team has argued that the melodies are different and the elements used in both songs are common in pop music.
The lawsuit alleges there are “melodic, harmonic, and rhythmic compositions” in the two songs that are “substantially and/or strikingly similar.
Link Copied!
The jury briefly deliberated Wednesday before ending for the day
Musician Ed Sheeran leaves US Federal Court in New York City on April 25.
(Fatih Aktas/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)
The jury in the Ed Sheeran copyright infringement case — about whether Sheeran’s smash single “Thinking Out Loud” copied the classic Marvin Gaye song “Let’s Get It On” — deliberated for about five minutes Wednesday evening before the judge sent jury members home.
Jurors sent a note to Judge Louis Stanton requesting that it break deliberations for the night and the judge granted that request around 5:10 p.m.
The jury continued deliberations Thursday morning at 10 a.m.
Earlier Wednesday, an attorney representing the family suing Sheeran asked the jury Wednesday not to be “blinded by the defendant’s celebrity.”
“Mr. Sheeran is counting on you to be very, very overwhelmed by his commercial success,” attorney Keisha Rice said in her closing argument Wednesday.